Biology subjects

Eden, G. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Eden, G. F..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Associations between brain structure and both language proficiency and language balance in early bilinguals

Prior studies in bilinguals have reported relationships between brain structure and the dimensions of (i) language proficiency or (ii) language balance (the discrepancy between a bilinguals two proficiencies), but rarely both, even though they are highly related. These studies were often conducted in late bilinguals and the analyses limited to regions of interest. Here, we tested for relationships between brain structure and these two dimensions in 46 early cultural Spanish-English bilinguals (mean age = 16.7 years) at the level of the whole brain for gray matter volume (GMV) and cortical thickness (CT). Results revealed a positive association between GMV and proficiency in the weaker language in the right angular gyrus (AG; BA 39) extending into the superior temporal gyrus (BA 22). More balanced bilingualism was also associated with more GMV in the AG (BA 39), in addition to less GMV in left postcentral gyrus (BA 1), right cerebellum lobule IX and right superior occipital gyrus (BA 18). However, these relationships between GMV and balance disappeared after controlling for language proficiency. No significant associations were observed for CT and these two dimensions of language. Our findings suggest that relationships between GMV and balance are driven by language proficiency, and that the relationship between GMV and language proficiency likely does not involve language-specific mechanisms, given the location of the association is in the right inferior parietal cortex. Together, this study separates the neuroanatomical bases of these two language dimensions and places them in brain regions outside those usually targeted in prior studies. HighlightsO_LINeuroanatomy was correlated with proficiencies in early Spanish-English bilinguals C_LIO_LIRight angular gyrus gray matter volume (GMV) was positively related to proficiency C_LIO_LIGMV was positively related to balance, but not after controlling for proficiency C_LIO_LIRelations with these language dimensions are located outside of language cortex C_LIO_LINo significant associations were observed for cortical thickness C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Are executive function and neuroanatomy in ADHD modulated by bilingualism?

It has been proposed that bilinguals have better executive function (EF) arising from the constant selection of one language while inhibiting the other, and gray matter has been found to differ in bilinguals in regions linked to EF (frontal-parietal and subcortical structures). Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is associated with poorer EF and neuroanatomical differences underlying EF. Given the EF advantage in bilinguals, we investigated whether a bilingual experience affects EF performance and brain structure differentially in those with ADHD. Using the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study, we compared early Spanish-English bilinguals and English-speaking monolinguals with and without ADHD. ANOVAs for the Flanker, Working Memory, and Card Sort Tasks revealed no main effects of Language Experience (Bilingual versus Monolingual), a main effect of Diagnostic Group for Card Sort (ADHD worse than Controls), and no interaction effects on performance for any task. ANOVAs for gray matter volume (GMV) revealed a main effect of Language Experience in many regions, a main effect of Diagnostic Group in some regions, but no interactions. GMV in left thalamus was affected by both ADHD and bilingualism, but the effect of ADHD was not significantly diminished or enhanced by the dual-language experience. For cortical thickness, there was a main effect of Language Experience in several regions, no main effect of Diagnostic Group, and no interactions. Taken together, bilingualism has some impact on EF performance, a strong impact on neuroanatomy, but there was no disproportionate impact by bilingualism on the differences caused by ADHD for any measure. Research HighlightsExecutive function and brain structure differ in ADHD and in bilinguals, prompting the need to investigate interactive effects. Bilingualism did not disproportionately affect performance differences in ADHD for executive function, nor for gray matter volume or for cortical thickness differences in ADHD. Gray matter volume was less in ADHD than non-ADHD, as well as greater in bilinguals than monolinguals in the left thalamus, but without interaction effect. These independent effects indicate that the brain basis of ADHD is not impacted by a dual-language experience.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Neuroanatomical differences between early bilingual and monolingual children

Prior studies have reported inconsistent results for neuroanatomical differences between early bilinguals and monolinguals. These studies primarily measured gray matter volume (GMV), involved small samples, and prioritized adults. Few studies of early bilinguals have measured cortical thickness (CT), which offers more anatomical specificity. It remains unclear whether results derived from differing metrics and approaches (e.g., vertex-versus parcel-wise analyses) converge. Using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM (ABCD) Study, we compared neuroanatomy between large groups of early cultural Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children (N = 1,209) matched on age, pubertal status, sex, handedness, socioeconomic status (SES), and nonverbal reasoning. Whole-brain voxel-based morphometry revealed areas of greater and of lesser GMV in bilinguals than monolinguals across all lobes. Vertex-wise CT analyses similarly identified widespread differences, with bilinguals showing areas of both thicker and thinner cortex. We contextualized these findings with parcel-wise CT analyses (average CT values), utilizing two atlases of differing spatial granularity. Parcel-wise results showed good correspondence with vertex-wise findings when implementing the more fine-grained atlas (Destrieux), but use of the coarser atlas (Desikan-Killiany) provided results that led to different conclusions. Finally, we tested for interaction effects between bilingualism and SES on CT and found several regions where differences between bilinguals and monolinguals in CT were modulated by SES. Together, these findings indicate that early bilingualism is associated with extensive neuroanatomical differences relative to monolinguals during childhood, and that these results can vary as a function of neuroanatomical metric, analysis approach, atlas granularity, and SES. Research HighlightsEarly Spanish-English bilingual and monolingual children differ in gray matter volume and cortical thickness across multiple brain regions. Cortical thickness differences between bilinguals and monolinguals cannot be firmly attributed to adaptations associated with language or executive control. Socioeconomic status modulates cortical differences between early bilinguals and monolinguals, revealing unique thickness patterns for those with lower versus higher SES backgrounds. Parcel-wise between-group cortical thickness results are affected by atlas choice and can influence the interpretation of the findings.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

A discovery and replication study of dyslexia does not reveal reproducible gray matter volume differences

Two decades of research have provided evidence for gray matter volume (GMV) differences in developmental dyslexia (or reading disability, RD) in the left perisylvian cortex. However, there are concerns about result inconsistencies, likely attributable to small sample sizes, lenient statistical thresholds, and insufficient accounting for demographic variables and global GMV (Ramus et al., 2018). To address these concerns, we conducted a Discovery and Replication Study (N=262) using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. We found GMV differences between the RD and Control Groups did not replicate across the Discovery and Replication Studies using voxel-based morphometry (VBM) in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM), and that a more conservative threshold yielded far fewer results. We then conducted Reproducibility Studies and first found that when using surface-based morphometry in FreeSurfer instead of VBM, the Discovery and the Replication Study results again failed to converge. Second, we combined all groups in a factorial VBM/SPM analysis and the interaction analysis provided quantitative confirmation for diverging between-group difference results across the two studies. Third, we tested for the role of covariates of no interest and found that when total GMV is not controlled for, this divergence dissipates and group differences in RD (main effect of Reading Ability) are amplified. In conclusion, replication of GMV differences in RD is low, even when using large, well-matched groups, and analyses approaches play a modulating role. As such, results from prior studies using lenient statistical thresholds and not accounting for total GMV should therefore be viewed with caution.

neuroscience↗