Ebitz, B. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2020

Human dorsal anterior cingulate neurons signal conflict by amplifying task-relevant information

Hemodynamic activity in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) correlates with conflict, suggesting it contributes to conflict processing. This correlation could be explained by multiple neural processes that can be disambiguated by population firing rates patterns. We used targeted dimensionality reduction to characterize activity of populations of single dACC neurons as humans performed a task that manipulates two forms of conflict. Although conflict enhanced firing rates, this enhancement did not come from a discrete population of domain-general conflict-encoding neurons, nor from a distinct conflict-encoding response axis. Nor was it the epiphenomenal consequence of simultaneous coactivation of action plans. Instead, conflict amplified the task-relevant information encoded across the neuronal population. Effects of conflict were weaker and more heterogeneous in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), suggesting that dACCs role in conflict processing may be somewhat specialized. Overall, these results support the theory that conflict biases competition between sensorimotor transformation processes occurring in dACC.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Rule adherence warps decision-making

We have the capacity to follow arbitrary stimulus-response rules, meaning policies that determine how we will behave across circumstances. Yet, it is not clear how rules guide sensorimotor decision-making in the brain. Here, we recorded from neurons in three regions linked to decision-making, the orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum, and dorsal striatum, while macaques performed a rule-based decision-making task. We found that different rules warped the neural representations of chosen options by expanding rule-relevant coding dimensions relative to rule-irrelevant ones. Some cognitive theories suggest that warping could increase processing efficiency by facilitating rule-relevant computations at the expense of irrelevant ones. To test this idea, we modeled rules as the latent causes of decisions and identified a set of "rule-free" choices that could not be explained by simple rules. Contrasting these with rule-based choices revealed that following rules decreased the energetic cost of decision-making while warping the representational geometry of choice. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTOne important part of our ability to adapt flexibly to the world around us is our ability to implement arbitrary stimulus-response mappings, known as "rules". Many studies have shown that when we follow a rule, its identity is encoded in neuronal firing rates. However, it remains unclear how rules regulate behavior. Here, we report that rules warp the way that sensorimotor information is represented in decision-making circuits: enhancing information that is relevant to the current rule at the expense of information that is irrelevant. These results imply that rules are implemented as a kind of attentional gate on what information is available for decision-making.

neuroscience↗