bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Dupont, W.

Publications and source records attributed to Dupont, W..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural activation down to the spinal cord during action language? A transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation study.

Language comprehension is increasingly recognized as extending beyond the traditional linguistic system to engage motor and perceptual processes. This perspective is supported by numerous studies demonstrating that understanding action-related words often induces behavioral and neurophysiological changes in the motor system. However, it remains unclear whether the influence of action language on the motor system is restricted to cortical regions, or whether it also extends to spinal structures, as observed during motor imagery. To address this, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation to assess corticospinal excitability and cortico-motoneuronal transmission, respectively. Fifteen healthy and right-handed volunteers participated in four conditions: (i) rest, (ii) kinesthetic motor imagery of finger and wrist flexion, (iii) reading action sentences, and (iv) reading non-action sentences. As anticipated, corticospinal excitability increased during both kinesthetic motor imagery and action reading compared to rest. Interestingly, while kinesthetic motor imagery also led to the expected increase in cortico-motoneuronal transmission, no such modulation occurred during action reading. These findings suggest that action reading do not modulate the excitability of high-threshold motoneurons at the spinal level, contrary to motor imagery. Further investigation is needed to test whether action reading activate lower-threshold spinal structures, such as interneurons involved in spinal pre-synaptic inhibition.

neuroscience↗

Reading about sensations recruits the posterior insula: An intracranial EEG study

When we read, how do words and sentences become concepts? Contrary to theoretical perspectives that conceptualize meaning and concepts as symbolic and abstract, embodied approaches propose that semantic access relies on mental simulations of bodily experiences□associated with the word’s meaning (e.g., simulating the act of running when we read the word ‘run’ or feeling pain when reading the word ‘burn’). If this view of cognition underpins conceptual processing, then sensory and motor cortices should play an early role during language comprehension. To test this idea, we recorded intracranial neural activity (High-Frequency Activity, 50–150 Hz) in epileptic patients while they read short sentences from different semantic categories: abstract-, action- and sensation-related. We hypothesized that reading sensation-related sentences (e.g., “he burns me”) would preferentially involve the posterior insula — a key region for processing affective and painful sensations. Our results, revealed an early functional dissociation between the anterior and posterior insula: the anterior insula showed a non-selective response across all semantic categories, whereas the posterior insula presented an early selective response (around 170 ms) for the sensation-related ones. Furthermore, the intensity of this selective neural response in the posterior insula correlated with the intensity of subjective perceived pain. These results provide direct intracranial evidence suggesting that language is deeply rooted in body-environment interactions.

neuroscience↗

Exploring dynamic brain oscillations in motor imagery and low-frequency sound

While both motor imagery (MI) and low-frequency sound listening have independently demonstrated the ability to modulate brain activity, there remains an unexplored frontier regarding the potential synergistic effects that may arise from their combined application. Any further modulation derived from this combination may be relevant for motor learning and/or rehabilitation. We conducted an experiment probing the electrophysiological activity of brain during these processes. By means of EEG, we recorded alpha and beta band power amplitude, which serve as markers of brain activity. Twenty volunteers were instructed to i) explicitly imagine finger flexion/extension movements in a kinaesthetic modality, ii) listen to low-frequency sounds, iii) imagine finger flexion while listening to low-frequency sounds, and iv) stay at rest. We observed a bimodal distribution, suggesting the presence of variability in brain activity across participants during both MI and low-frequency sound listening. One group of participants (12 individuals) displayed increased alpha power within contralateral sensorimotor and ipsilateral medial parieto-occipital regions during MI. Another group (8 individuals) exhibited a decrease in alpha and beta band power within sensorimotor areas. Interestingly, low-frequency sound listening elicited a similar pattern of brain activity within both groups. Surprisingly, the combination of MI and sound listening did not result in additional changes in alpha and beta power amplitudes compared to these processes in isolation, regardless of group. Altogether, these findings shed significant insight into the brain activity and its variability generated during MI and low-frequency sound listening. Nevertheless, it appears that the simultaneous engagement of MI and low-frequency sound listening could not further modulate alpha power amplitude, possibly due to concurrent cortical activations. This prompts us to inquire whether administering these interventions sequentially could uncover any additional modulation.

neuroscience↗

Explicit and implicit motor simulations are impaired in individuals with aphantasia

Individuals with aphantasia report having difficulties or an inability to generate visual images of objects or events. So far, there is no evidence showing that this condition also impacts the motor system and the generation of motor simulations. We probed the neurophysiological marker of aphantasia during explicit and implicit forms of motor simulation, i.e., motor imagery and action observation, respectively. We tested a group of individuals without any reported imagery deficits (phantasics) as well as a group of individuals self-reporting the inability to form mental images (aphantasics). We instructed the participants to explicitly imagine a maximal pinch movement in the visual and kinesthetic modalities and to observe a video showing a pinch movement. By means of transcranial magnetic stimulation, we triggered motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in the target right index finger. As expected, MEP amplitude, a marker of corticospinal excitability, increased for phantasics during kinaesthetic motor imagery and action observation relative to rest but not during visual motor imagery. Interestingly, MEP amplitude did not increase in either form of motor simulation for the group of aphantasics. This result provides neurophysiological evidence that individuals living with aphantasia have a real deficit in activating the motor system during motor simulations.

neuroscience↗

Reading negative action verbs: one or two-step processing within the primary motor cortex?

Controversy persists regarding the representation of negated actions, specifically concerning activation and inhibitory mechanisms in the motor system, and whether this occurs in one or two steps. We conducted two experiments probing corticospinal excitability (CSE) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the primary motor cortex at different latencies while reading affirmative and negative action sentences. Twenty-six participants read action and non-action sentences in affirmative or negative forms. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we probed CSE in hand muscles at rest and at several latencies after verb presentation. We observed a greater CSE for action sentences compared to non-action sentences, regardless of verb form. In experiment two, nineteen participants read affirmative and negative action sentences. We measured CSE and SICI at short and long latencies after verb presentation. CSE was greater for affirmative and negative action sentences at both latencies compared to rest. SICI did not change at the short latency but increased at longer latencies, regardless of verb form. Our results lend partial support for a two-step model, as negated actions showed the same motor excitability as affirmed actions with no additional inhibition at early latencies. Later neural differences between affirmative and negative actions may occur outside the primary motor cortex. Significant statementIn two TMS experiments, we probed corticospinal excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition in the primary motor cortex at different latencies while subjects read affirmative and negative action sentences. Consistent with an embodied view of language comprehension, our results demonstrate that reading about actions indeed activates the motor system, and this for both negative and affirmative sentences. Our results lend partial support for a two-step model of negation, as negated actions showed the same increase in motor excitability as affirmed actions, with no additional inhibition at early latencies. This suggests that the motor system contributes to comprehension by simulating the negated or affirmed action. Later neural differences between affirmative and negative actions may occur outside the primary motor cortex.

neuroscience↗

Mental practice modulates functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex.

Our brain has the extraordinary capacity to improve motor skills through mental practice. Conceptually, this ability is attributed to internal forward models, which are neural networks that can predict the sensory consequences of motor commands. While the cerebellum is considered as a potential locus of internal forward models, evidence for its involvement in mental practice is missing. In our study, we employed single and dual transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to probe the level of corticospinal excitability and of cerebellar-brain inhibition, respectively, before and after a mental practice session or a control session. Motor skills (i.e., accuracy and speed) were measured using a sequential finger tapping-task. Here, we show that mental practice enhances both speed and accuracy. In parallel, the functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex changes, with less inhibition from the first to the second, expressing the existence of neuroplastic changes within the cerebellum after mental practice. These findings reveal that the corticocerebellar loop is a major neural circuit for skill improvement after mental practice.

neuroscience↗