Dully, J. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2025

A Movement-Independent Signature of Urgency During Human Perceptual Decision Making

How does the brain adjust its decision processes to ensure timely decision completion? Computational modelling and electrophysiological investigations have pointed to dynamic urgency processes that serve to progressively reduce the quantity of evidence required to reach choice commitment as time elapses. To date, such urgency dynamics have been observed exclusively in neural signals that accumulate evidence for a specific motor plan. Across three complementary experiments, we show that a classic ERP component, the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV), also traces dynamic urgency but exhibits unique properties not observed in effector-selective signals. Firstly, it provides a representation of urgency alone, growing only as a function of time and not evidence strength. Secondly, when choice reports must be withheld until a response cue, the CNV peaks and decays long before response execution, mirroring the early termination dynamics of a motor-independent evidence accumulation signal. These properties suggest that the brain may use urgency signals not only to expedite motor planning but also to hasten cognitive deliberation. These data demonstrate that urgency processes operate in a variety of perceptual choice scenarios and that they can be monitored in a model-independent manner via non-invasive brain signals. Significance StatementComputational models suggest that, when decisions are time-constrained the brain progressively lowers the amount of evidence it requires to reach choice commitment, thus increasingly sacrificing accuracy for timely decision completion. To date, neurophysiological investigations have identified signatures of these urgency effects exclusively in areas of the brain that plan the decision-reporting actions. Here, we characterise a human electroencephalogram signature of urgency that exhibits several novel properties: it traces the urgency component of the decision and terminates upon choice commitment even when the decision-reporting action is deferred until later. These observations suggest that urgency can serve to hasten the deliberation process and not just the movements that a decision entails.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Prior probability cues bias sensory encoding with increasing task exposure

When observers have prior knowledge about the likely outcome of their perceptual decisions, they exhibit robust behavioural biases in reaction time and choice accuracy. Computational modelling typically attributes these effects to strategic adjustments in the criterion amount of evidence required to commit to a choice alternative - usually implemented by a starting point shift - but recent work suggests that expectations may also fundamentally bias the encoding of the sensory evidence itself. Here, we recorded neural activity with EEG while participants performed a contrast discrimination task with valid, invalid, or neutral probabilistic cues across multiple testing sessions. We measured sensory evidence encoding via contrast-dependent steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEP), while a read-out of criterion adjustments was provided by effector-selective mu-beta band activity over motor cortex. In keeping with prior modelling and neural recording studies, cues evoked substantial biases in motor preparation consistent with criterion adjustments, but we additionally found that the cues produced a significant modulation of the SSVEP during evidence presentation. While motor preparation adjustments were observed in the earliest trials, the sensory-level effects only emerged with extended task exposure. Our results suggest that, in addition to strategic adjustments to the decision process, probabilistic information can also induce subtle biases in the encoding of the evidence itself.

neuroscience↗