Biology subjects

DuPont, S. T.

Publications and source records attributed to DuPont, S. T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Effects of a field-sprayed antibiotic on bee foraging behavior and pollination in pear orchards

Broadcast spraying of antibiotics in crops is widely used for controlling bacterial plant pathogens. The effects of antibiotics on non-target (and especially beneficial) organisms in cropping systems, however, are not well studied. Pollinators are of particular concern because in pear and apple crops, antibiotics for controlling fire blight (Erwinia amylovora) are sprayed during bloom, likely exposing pollinators. This is especially relevant as laboratory evidence suggests that antibiotics could have sublethal effects on bee foraging behavior and colony health. But to our knowledge these potential impacts have not been studied in field settings. Here, we compared the effects of two fire blight control methods, a single spray of an antibiotic (oxytetracycline) and a biological antagonist (Aureobasidium pullulans), on honey bee (Apis mellifera) foraging, pollination, and fruit set in pear orchards. Complementing these field assessments, we conducted laboratory experiments to examine the effects of these treatments on locomotion and foraging behavior of the bumble bee species, Bombus vosnesenskii. We found that honey bees visited fewer flowers and foraged longer on each flower in orchards sprayed with antibiotics than with biological product, but there were no differences in pollination and seed set. The pear cultivars we worked in, however, can self-pollinate. In the lab, we found that feeding on high doses of either the antibiotic or the biological antagonist reduced bumble bee foraging behavior relative to controls. The limited impact of antibiotics on pear pollination observed in this study suggest that antibiotics pose a low economic risk to pear growers, especially for self-compatible cultivars. Still, crops with higher pollinator dependence may be more affected by reductions in pollinator visitation. Future studies should examine the impacts of multiple antibiotic sprays within a season, which are common during warm springs, and their long-term health impacts on both individual bees and colonies. HighlightsO_LIAntibiotics are sprayed on many crops to control plant bacterial pathogens. C_LIO_LIThe impacts of antibiotics on beneficial organisms in agriculture are unknown. C_LIO_LIWe studied antibiotic impacts on bee behavior and pollination function in pears. C_LIO_LIBees exposed to antibiotics visit fewer flowers and this could impact bee fitness. C_LIO_LIDespite decreased bee visitation, we did not detect a reduction in crop pollination. C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=83 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/528407v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17c2189org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7dd952org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4696beorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@52b7fd_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2020

Orchard management and landscape context mediate the floral microbiome of pear

Crop-associated microbiota are key factors affecting host health and productivity. Most crops are grown within heterogeneous landscapes, and interactions between management practices and landscape context often affect plant and animal biodiversity in agroecosystems. However, whether these same factors typically affect crop-associated microbiota is less clear. Here, we assessed whether orchard management strategies and landscape context affected bacterial and fungal communities in pear (Pyrus communis) flowers. We found that bacteria and fungi responded differently to management schemes. Organically-certified orchards had higher fungal diversity in flowers than conventional or bio-based integrated pest management (IPM) orchards, but organic orchards had the lowest bacterial diversity. Orchard management scheme also best predicted the distribution of several important bacterial and fungal genera that either cause or suppress disease, with organic and bio-based IPM best explaining the distributions of bacterial and fungal genera, respectively. Moreover, patterns of bacterial and fungal diversity were affected by interactions between management, landscape context, and climate. When examining the similarity of bacterial and fungal communities across sites, both abundance- and taxa-related turnover were mediated primarily by orchard management scheme and landscape context, and specifically the amount of land in cultivation. Our study reveals local- and landscape-level drivers of floral microbiome structure in a major fruit crop, providing insights that can inform microbiome management to promote host health and high-yielding quality fruit. IMPORTANCEIn tree fruits, proper crop management during bloom is essential for producing disease-free fruit. Tree fruits are often grown in heterogeneous landscapes; however, few studies have assessed whether landscape context and crop management affect the floral microbiome, which plays a critical role in shaping plant health and disease tolerance. Such work is key for identification of tactics and/or contexts where beneficial microbes proliferate, and pathogenic microbes are limited. Here, we characterize the floral microbiome of pear crops in Washington State, USA, where major production occurs in inter-mountain valleys and basins with variable elevation and microclimates. Our results show that both local (crop management) and landscape (habitat types and climate) level factors affect floral microbiota, but in disparate ways for each kingdom, suggesting a need for unique management strategies for each group. More broadly, these findings can potentially inform microbiome management in orchards for promotion of host health and high-quality yields.

microbiology↗