Biology subjects

Drucker, K. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Drucker, K. L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Chromosome-arm-specific telomere length governs dual modes of structural genome evolution in IDH-mutant astrocytoma

IDH-mutant astrocytomas maintain telomeres through the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway, producing extreme inter-arm telomere length heterogeneity, yet how this heterogeneity shapes structural genome evolution remains unknown. Using Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing of 20 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, we profiled structural variants (SVs), copy number variants, extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) and measured allele-specific telomere lengths from individual long reads. We identified pervasive complex rearrangements, including chromothripsis and foldback events consistent with breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, and widespread ecDNAs. SV breakpoints were enriched at telomeric and centromeric regions regardless of local telomere length, revealing constitutive structural fragility. Arm-level telomere length analysis uncovered a dual-mode model: arms with short telomeres preferentially harbored breakage-associated events, while arms with long ALT-maintained telomeres were enriched for ecDNA and amplification-associated events. These findings identify chromosome-arm-specific telomere length as a determinant of structural genome evolution in ALT-driven tumors.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Clonally selected lines after CRISPR/Cas editing are not isogenic

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has enabled researchers to precisely modify/edit the sequence of a genome. A typical editing experiment consists of two steps: (i) editing cultured cells; (ii) cell cloning and selection of clones with and without intended edit, presumed to be isogenic. The application of CRISPR-Cas9 system may result in off-target edits, while cloning will reveal culture-acquired mutations. We analyzed the extent of the former and the latter by whole genome sequencing in three experiments involving separate genomic loci and conducted by three independent laboratories. In all experiments we hardly found any off-target edits, while detecting hundreds to thousands of single nucleotide mutations unique to each clone after relatively short culture of 10-20 passages. Notably, clones also differed in copy number alterations that were several kb to several mb in size and represented the largest source of genomic divergence among clones. We suggest that screening of clones for mutations and copy number alterations acquired in culture is a necessary step to allow correct interpretation of DNA editing experiments. Furthermore, since culture associated mutations are inevitable, we propose that experiments involving derivation of clonal lines should compare a mix of multiple unedited lines and a mix of multiple edited lines.

genomics↗