bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Driver-Dunckley, E. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Driver-Dunckley, E. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Disease progression modelling reveals heterogeneity in trajectories of Lewy-type alpha-synuclein pathology

Lewy body (LB) disorders, characterized by the aggregation of misfolded -synuclein proteins, exhibit notable clinical heterogeneity. This may be due to variations in accumulation patterns of LB neuropathology. By applying data-driven disease progression modelling to regional neuropathological LB density scores from 814 brain donors, we describe three inferred trajectories of LB pathology that were characterized by differing clinicopathological presentation and longitudinal antemortem clinical progression. Most donors (81.9%) showed earliest pathology in the olfactory bulb, followed by accumulation in either limbic (60.8%) or brainstem (21.1%) regions. The remaining donors (18.1%) exhibited the first abnormalities in brainstem regions. Early limbic pathology was associated with Alzheimers disease-associated characteristics. Meanwhile, brainstem-first pathology was associated with progressive motor impairment and substantial LB pathology outside of the brain. Our data provides evidence for heterogeneity in the temporal spread of LB pathology, possibly explaining some of the clinical disparities observed in LBDs.

pathology↗

Severe Hyposmia Distinguishes Neuropathologically Confirmed Dementia with Lewy Bodies from Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia

Due to the absence of core clinical features, many subjects with neuropathologically-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are never diagnosed as such during life. Most of these are diagnosed with Alzheimers disease dementia (ADD) or unspecified dementia. Unrecognized DLB therefore is a critical impediment to clinical studies and treatment trials of both ADD and DLB. There are numerous published studies that suggest that olfactory function tests may be able to differentiate some neurodegenerative conditions from each other and from normal subjects, but there are very few studies with neuropathological confirmation of diagnosis. We compared University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) results in 209 subjects: 1) 29 concurrently meeting intermediate or high consensus clinicopathological criteria for both DLB and ADD 2) 96 meeting criteria for ADD without DLB 3) 84 control subjects that were non-demented and without parkinsonism at death. The DLB subjects had significantly lower (one-way ANOVA p < 0.0001, pairwise Bonferroni p < 0.05) first and mean UPSIT scores (13.7 and 13.2) than ADD (23.3 and 22.2) or controls (29.6 and 28.9). For subjects with first and mean UPSIT scores less than 20 and 17, respectively, Firth logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, gender and mean MMSE score, conferred statistically significant odds ratios of 17.5 and 18.0 for predicting a DLB vs ADD diagnosis, as compared to 3.3 for the presence or absence of visual hallucinations throughout the clinical observation period. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date comparing olfactory function in subjects with neuropathologically confirmed DLB and ADD. Olfactory function testing may be a convenient and inexpensive strategy for enriching dementia studies or clinical trials with DLB subjects, or conversely, reducing the inclusion of DLB subjects in ADD studies or trials.

neuroscience↗