Biology subjects

Distiller, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Distiller, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Dog-assisted scat sampling reveals genetic diversity, structure, and relatedness in black-footed cats (Felis nigripes)

Advances in molecular techniques for non-invasive genetic sampling have strengthened wildlife genetics, enabling researchers to study elusive and difficult-to-study species with minimal disturbance, and conservation detection dogs can greatly increase sample numbers and the area covered. However, this combination is rarely used in Africa and has perhaps never been applied to a small carnivore on the continent. Here we use dog-assisted scat surveys to carry out the first fine-scale population genetic study of the black-footed cat (Felis nigripes), Africa's smallest and most range-restricted endemic felid, and a threatened species for which conventional survey methods are largely ineffective. Using 130 successfully genotyped scat samples (nine microsatellite loci) from two populations about 650 km apart, we identified 65 individuals and assessed genetic diversity and fine-scale relatedness to explore aspects of dispersal and reproductive ecology. Both populations exhibited similar observed heterozygosity (Ho = 0.67-0.69) and allelic richness, with no heterozygote deficit (FIS = -0.02 to -0.08). Differentiation between the southern Namibia and central South Africa sites was low but detectable (FST = 0.03-0.05). We used pairwise relatedness and candidate pedigree results to explore hypotheses about sex-specific relatedness patterns. Female-female dyads were more related than male-male dyads at the shortest distance class (0-2 km), a pattern compatible with female philopatry. There were more half-sibling than full-sibling assignments and uneven representation of candidate fathers, which may indicate polygamy and reproductive skew. These results provide baseline genetic data for a Vulnerable species and show that this approach is feasible for Africa's small, elusive carnivores, whose dispersal, mating systems and population structure remain largely unknown. Broader spatial and temporal sampling could help assess population connectivity and reveal how threats and changing land use impact genetic diversity and structure.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

Designing spatial capture recapture surveys for multiple populations

Recent work on the design of spatial capture-recapture (SCR) studies has largely focused on settings with a single set of movement and detection parameters. In many applied contexts, however, populations are naturally stratified-for example, when different sexes exhibit markedly different movement scales and encounter processes, or when more than one focal species is monitored. Designs that perform well for one group may be inefficient or suboptimal for others, despite the substantial logistical effort typically required to implement an SCR survey. We describe several potential SCR design strategies for surveying multiple groups, and compare these using simulation. Designs considered include regular and optimised grids, clustered and lacework designs, and designs generated using genetic algorithms, including new approaches that optimise information from both groups and a recently published two-stage design. Using proximity detectors such as camera traps, we evaluate design performance in terms of precision, bias, and coverage, and examine how performance changes with the number of available resources. Our results show that multi-group SCR surveys can perform well even when focal groups differ greatly in movement scale and encounter rate, provided that some simple guidelines are followed. Systematic layouts accommodating more than one characteristic spacing e.g. cluster designs, performed consistently well and are a reliable default option. Regular grid designs with a single spacing between detectors are feasible when differences between groups are moderate but performed poorly as differences increased. Establishing when these designs become problematic adds unnecessary risk to the design process. Algorithmic designs did not outperform systematic designs even in highly-skewed scenarios expected to favour them. In practice, when there is more than one focal group we recommend identifying the smallest and largest plausible movement scales and rejecting potentially pathological designs, primarily those that cannot generate recaptures at the smaller scale or cover a substantial area at the larger scale.

ecology↗