bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Dikici, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Dikici, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Enhancing slow-wave sleep via non-invasive brain stimulation modulates brain-to-blood clearance of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers

Sleep disturbances and neurodegeneration form a bidirectional vicious cycle. During slow-wave sleep, glymphatic processes are thought to facilitate the clearance of metabolic waste, including proteins implicated in Alzheimers disease (AD). Aging, and more prominently neurodegeneration, is associated with reductions in slow-wave activity (SWA), which may impair these processes. Within SWA, slow oscillations (SO, <1 Hz) and their coupling to sleep spindles capture key aspects of sleep microstructure. Non-invasive brain stimulation during sleep has emerged as a potential approach to modulate these dynamics; however, human evidence linking such modulation to AD biomarkers remains scarce. In this exploratory mechanistic study, ten healthy older adults underwent one night of slow-oscillatory transcranial current stimulation (so-tDCS) and one sham night in a randomized crossover design, followed by five consecutive stimulation nights. Stimulation was applied during NREM sleep (N2/N3) in the first half of the night. Plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181, {beta}-amyloid (A{beta})42, A{beta}40, and total tau were assessed overnight and longitudinally. EEG analyses quantified SO power and SO-spindle coupling. Due to the exploratory character of the study, analyses emphasized effect size estimation and explained variance. So-tDCS induced small-to-moderate increases in SO power and SO-spindle coupling. Overnight increases in plasma p-tau181 were observed following stimulation relative to sham. Increases in SO power were strongly and positively associated with p-tau181 changes, explaining a substantial proportion of inter-individual variance. In contrast, shifts in SO-spindle coupling phase toward the SO up-state were associated with overnight increases in A{beta}42 and A{beta}40 and with longitudinal decreases in A{beta}42 and the A{beta}42/40 ratio. Enhancing slow oscillatory dynamics during sleep is associated with changes in peripheral AD biomarkers. Differential associations for SO power and SO-spindle coupling timing suggest partially distinct links to tau and A{beta} dynamics. These findings support sleep microstructure as a potential intervention target, and should be confirmed in larger cohorts.

neuroscience↗

Polarity-dependent modulation of sleep oscillations and cortical excitability in aging

During non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, cortical slow oscillation (SO; <1 Hz) and thalamic sleep spindle activity (12-15 Hz) interact through precise phase coupling to support memory consolidation. Slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) can modulate these oscillations. Traditionally, anodal so-tDCS is used to depolarize the cortex during SO up-states, thereby promoting SO activity and SO-spindle coupling. However, intracranial findings suggest that SO down-states, characterized by cortical hyperpolarization, can trigger thalamic spindle bursts. This raises the hypothesis that cathodal so-tDCS, by promoting hyperpolarization, could selectively enhance down-states and more effectively improve SO-spindle coupling. We tested this hypothesis in twenty-two healthy older adults, a population known to exhibit diminished NREM oscillatory activity. Each participant received cathodal, anodal, and sham so-tDCS in separate nap sleep sessions. We quantified SO and spindle characteristics, their temporal coupling, and cortical excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance using EEG spectral slope. We also assessed individual circadian preference (chronotype) as a potential moderator. We found that anodal so-tDCS improved SO-spindle synchrony, and increased spindle power over sham in participants with intermediate or evening chronotypes, while cathodal so-tDCS did not enhance these oscillatory measures compared to sham, despite prolonging SO down-states. Anodal stimulation also elevated E/I balance, indicating increased cortical excitability, whereas cathodal stimulation did not produce the anticipated opposite shift. In summary, anodal, but not cathodal so-tDCS, effectively enhanced thalamocortical interactions underlying memory consolidation. Furthermore, these findings highlight the importance of individual factors such as chronotype in brain stimulation responsiveness.

neuroscience↗