bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Desantis, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Desantis, A..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Interplay of action-based prediction and top-down attention: EEG evidence for joint modulation of late perceptual processing

Voluntary action shapes our perception through sensory predictions of its consequences. These predictions are thought to inhibit perceptual processing of predicted outcomes, leading to sensory attenuation. However, some studies have reported findings that contrast with this effect, suggesting that the influence of predictions may reflect, or interact with, attentional processes. Here, we investigated the interplay of action-based prediction and top-down attention on early and late perceptual processing, where prediction and attention refer to the likelihood of a sensory event and its behavioral relevance, respectively. Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded while participants viewed two sequential gratings. The orientation of the first was either predicted and self-generated or unpredicted and externally generated. Participants judged the tilt direction of the second grating relative to the first but responded only when the grating appeared in a task-relevant color. EEG analyses revealed no modulation of early visual potentials (N1a), but modulations in later processing stages (P3b). Specifically, the P3b exhibited reduced amplitude for predicted and self-generated stimuli compared to unpredicted and externally generated ones, but only when they were task-relevant. Multivariate pattern analysis further showed that the significant temporal cluster supporting decoding of the first gratings orientation was largest for relevant, predicted and self-generated stimuli. Our results suggest an optimization process whereby action-based prediction, when aligned with task goals, reduces the amount of evidence needed and increases its accumulation speed, while preserving sensory representations as accurate as in the absence of prediction/self-generation. HighlightsO_LIFeature-based attention and prediction were orthogonally manipulated in an agency context. C_LIO_LINo early sensory modulation by attention or action-based prediction was observed. C_LIO_LIReduction of both P3b amplitude and latency emerged for predicted/self-generated and task-relevant stimuli. C_LIO_LIMultivariate analysis and behavior results support an interpretation whereby relevant action-based predictions optimize evidence accumulation process. C_LI

neuroscience↗

Action monitoring boosts perceptual confidence

Dominant models of metacognition suggest that sensory information quality determines perceptual confidence, but recent accounts propose that motor signals also affect confidence judgments. In this study, we investigated the impact of motor planning of perceptual responses on decision confidence, testing two hypotheses. The "fluency hypothesis" suggests that ease of motor response selection and preparation enhances confidence. In contrast, the "monitoring hypothesis" posits that increased action monitoring during response selection boosts confidence, potentially counteracting response fluency. In three pre-registered experiments, participants reported the orientation of a stimulus and indicated their confidence in their response. A cue induced action planning that was either congruent or incongruent with the response side used to report the stimulus orientation. Across experiments, we consistently observed higher confidence when participants prepared spatially incongruent actions compared to congruent ones, regardless of response accuracy. In the third experiment, electroencephalography (EEG) revealed an increased fronto-central P2 amplitude for incongruent actions, suggesting that incongruent action planning heightened early attentional resources needed to resolve response conflict. Incongruent action plans also modulated post-response ERPs at centro-parietal channels (e.g., Pz), typically linked to confidence and error monitoring. These findings align with the "monitoring hypothesis" suggesting that the degree of action monitoring during response selection modulates retrospective decision confidence. Public Significance StatementWhile virtually every decision we make leads to an action, the role of motor processes in decision making has been largely neglected. Our results show that retrospective confidence in a perceptual discrimination task is boosted when the motor execution is spatially incongruent with motor preparation, independently of the correctness of the response. Electroencephalography recordings indicate that this effect could be explained by a larger involvement of early attentional resources related to action monitoring, which has an impact on confidence computations. Taken together, these results suggest that action planning information might trigger monitoring mechanisms susceptible to alter retrospective confidence in our decisions, implying that motor processes are not only the output, but also an input of the decision mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

The role of confidence in decision-making and its pupillary correlate during the interaction with a partner

Perceptual confidence reflects the ability to evaluate the evidence that supports perceptual decisions. It is thought to play a critical role in guiding decision-making, but only a few empirical studies have actually investigated the function of confidence. To address this issue, we designed a perceptual task in which participants provided a confidence judgment on the accuracy of their perceptual decision. Then, they viewed the response of a machine or human partner, and they were instructed to decide whether to keep or change their initial response. We observed that confidence predicted participants decision to keep or change their initial responses more than task difficulty and perceptual accuracy. This suggests that confidence, as a subjective evaluation of uncertainty, enables us to weigh our decisions, driving the interaction with a partner. Furthermore, confidence judgments could be predicted by pre-response pupil dynamics, suggesting that arousal changes are linked to confidence computations. This study contributes to our understanding of the function of confidence in decision-making and highlights the possibility of using pupil dynamics as a proxy of confidence.

neuroscience↗

Decoding trans-saccadic prediction error

We are constantly sampling our environment by moving our eyes, but our subjective experience of the world is stable and constant. Stimulus displacement during or shortly after a saccade often goes unnoticed, a phenomenon called the saccadic suppression of displacement. Although we fail to notice such displacements, our oculomotor system computes the prediction errors and adequately adjusts the gaze and future saccadic execution, a phenomenon known as saccadic adaptation. In the present study, we aimed to find a brain signature of the trans-saccadic prediction error that informs the motor system but not explicit perception. We asked participants (either sex) to report whether a visual target was displaced during a saccade while recording electroencephalography (EEG). Using multivariate pattern analysis, we were able to differentiate displacements from no displacements, even when participants failed to report the displacement. In other words, we found that trans-saccadic prediction error is represented in the EEG signal 100 ms after the displacement presentation, mainly in occipital and parieto-occipital channels, even in the absence of explicit perception of the displacement. Significance StatementStability in vision occurs even while performing saccades. One suggested mechanism for this counterintuitive visual phenomenon is that external displacement is suppressed during the retinal remapping caused by a saccade. Here, we shed light on the mechanisms of trans-saccadic stability by showing that displacement information is not entirely suppressed and specifically present in the early stages of visual processing. Such a signal is relevant and computed for oculomotor adjustment despite being neglected for perception.

neuroscience↗

Irrelevant auditory and tactile signals interact with the visual target onset and modulate saccade latencies, not visual signals

Saccadic eye movements bring events of interest to the center of the retina, enabling detailed visual analysis. This study explored whether irrelevant auditory (experiments A, B & F), visual (C & D) or tactile signals (E & F) delivered around the onset of a visual target modulates saccade latency. Participants were instructed to execute a quick saccade toward a target stepping left or right from a fixation position. We observed an interaction between auditory beeps or tactile vibrations and the oculomotor reaction that included two components: a warning effect resulting in faster saccades when the signal and the target were presented simultaneously; and a modulation effect with shorter - or longer - latencies when auditory and tactile signals were delivered before - or after - the target onset. Combining both modalities only increased the modulation effect to a limited extent, pointing to a saturation of the multisensory interaction with the motor control. Interestingly, irrelevant visual stimuli (black background or isoluminant noise stripes in peripheral vision, flashed for 10 ms) increased saccade latency whether they were presented just before or after target onset. The lack of latency reduction with visual signals suggests that the modulation observed in the auditory and tactile experiments was not related to priming effects but rather to low-level audio- and tactile-visual integration. The increase in saccade latency observed with irrelevant visual stimuli is discussed in relation to saccadic inhibition. Our results demonstrate that signals conveying no information regarding where and when a visual target would appear modulate saccadic reactivity, much like in multisensory temporal binding, but only when these signals come from a different modality.

neuroscience↗

Human Self-Initiated Action Is Preceded By A Reliable Process Of Noise Reduction

A gradual buildup of electrical potential over motor areas precedes self-initiated movements. Recently, such \"readiness potentials\" (RPs) were attributed to stochastic fluctuations in neural activity. We developed a new experimental paradigm that operationalised self-initiated actions as endogenous skip responses while waiting for target stimuli in a perceptual decision task. We compared these to a block of trials where participants could not choose when to skip, but were instead instructed to skip. Frequency and timing of motor action were therefore balanced across blocks, so that conditions differed only in how the timing of skip decisions was generated. We reasoned that across-trial variability of EEG could carry as much information about the source of skip decisions as the mean RP. EEG variability decreased more markedly prior to self-initiated compared to externally-triggered skip actions. This convergence suggests a consistent preparatory process prior to self-initiated action. A leaky stochastic accumulator model could reproduce this convergence given the additional assumption of a systematic decrease in input noise prior to self-initiated actions. Our results may provide a novel neurophysiological perspective on the topical debate regarding whether self-initiated actions arise from a deterministic neurocognitive process, or from neural stochasticity. We suggest that the key precursor of self-initiated action may manifest as a reduction in neural noise.

neuroscience↗