bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Deganutti, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Deganutti, G..

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Direct Small Molecule Modulation of LILRB4 (ILT3) Restores Anti-Tumor Immunity In Vivo and in Patient-Derived Cells

Small molecule targeting of suppressive myeloid immune checkpoints remains a major challenge in cancer immunotherapy, particularly for non-enzymatic receptors lacking conventional druggable active sites. Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B4 (LILRB4/ILT3) is an immunosuppressive myeloid checkpoint implicated in tumor immune evasion, T-cell dysfunction, and resistance to immunotherapy across both solid and hematologic malignancies. Here, we report the discovery and characterization of GL-4512, a direct small molecule modulator of LILRB4 identified through a Dianthus-based temperature-related intensity change (TRIC) screening platform. Orthogonal biophysical studies, including microscale thermophoresis, surface plasmon resonance, and cellular thermal shift assays, confirmed direct target engagement with nanomolar affinity. Extensive microsecond molecular dynamics simulations combined with site-directed mutagenesis identified a previously unrecognized ligandable pocket within the flexible extracellular domain of LILRB4. Functionally, GL-4512 disrupted the immunosuppressive LILRB4-SCG2 signaling axis and suppressed downstream SHP1/SHP2 and STAT3 signaling. In patient-derived colorectal cancer and acute myeloid leukemia co-culture systems, pharmacological inhibition of LILRB4 restored anti-tumor immune activity, enhanced IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 production, increased cytotoxic T-cell activation, and reduced tumor-cell viability. GL-4512 additionally demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetic and safety properties supporting oral in vivo administration. In immunocompetent CT26 syngeneic colorectal tumors, once-daily oral treatment significantly suppressed tumor growth and enhanced intratumoral immune activation. Collectively, these findings establish LILRB4 as a tractable target for direct small molecule immunomodulation and support therapeutic targeting of suppressive myeloid immune checkpoints for cancer using non-biologic modalities.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

PCO371 intracellular agonism at the parathyroid hormone 1 receptor produces pan-activation of signalling partners

Small-molecule agonists of class B1 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain rare because these receptors typically require large extracellular peptide ligands for activation. PCO371 is a notable exception: an intracellular non-peptide agonist, originally developed for osteoporosis treatment, that activates parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R) from the cytoplasmic face of the receptor and is considered Gs-protein biased. In this study, we compared the functional, pharmacological and structural properties of PCO371 with the canonical extracellular peptide agonist PTH 1-34 at the PTH1R to define the molecular mechanisms underlying PCO371's unusual signalling profile. By manipulating receptor reserve, we demonstrate that PCO371 is a partial agonist relative to PTH 1-34, contrary to previous observations. Across Gs, Gi3, Gq, cAMP, and {beta}-arrestin-2 pathways, operational model analysis showed that PCO371 is non-biased, engaging the same transducers as PTH1-34 but with ~1000-fold lower potency. Mechanistic modelling using the Cubic Ternary Complex Activation model revealed that reduced intrinsic efficacy is sufficient to reproduce PCO371's distinct monotonic signalling kinetics, providing a quantitative explanation for its partial agonism. PCO371 binding is {beta}-arrestin-compatible but only drives measurable {beta}-arrestin-2 recruitment when PTH1R is highly expressed. Molecular modelling suggests that PC0371 stable binding needs an intact receptor-G protein complex. Overall, these insights define the mechanistic basis of intracellular agonism at a class B1 GPCR and provide a framework for designing next-generation small-molecule modulators that exploit this emerging pharmacological space.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

AI-derived Protein Structures Validation: AlphaFold2 Models in the Twilight Zone

In any field, unquestioningly accepting artificial intelligence (AI) results should be considered bad practise. Here, we devised a comparative modelling-based strategy for validating protein structures that exploits the well-known observation that protein folds are far more conserved than protein sequences. We identify proteins with a similar fold to the AlphaFold-generated query protein and determine their structural alignment to the query. The hypothesis is that if the sequence alignment coincides with the structural alignment, then the structure is validated. The strategy is implemented on a helix-by-helix and strand-by-strand basis using a multi-template pairwise local profile alignment method that works well into the twilight zone. The method is illustrated by application to the transmembrane transporter PEPT1, for which the structure is known, and the S-deacylases ABHD13 and ABHD16A, for which only AI-generated models exist. ABHD16A is particularly challenging because a sequence alignment search with BLASTp does not reveal any structural homologues and therefore requires work with extremely remote homologues; however, both models are validated through this strategy and are stable during classical molecular dynamics simulations. The ability of the strategy to identify errors is assessed with reference to misaligned ABHD13 models and misfolded decoy proteins.

bioinformatics↗

Deacylation of SNAP25 protein family isoforms reveals distinct substrate selectivities of α/β hydrolase domain (ABHD) deacylases

Reversible S-acylation controls protein trafficking, localisation and activity within cells, yet the limited understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of S-acylation/deacylation cycles represents one of the biggest obstacles in exploiting this prevalent post-translational modification for therapeutic purposes. Here, we identified ABHD13 and ABHD16A as novel deacylases regulating the SNAP25 family of SNARE proteins responsible for vesicular membrane fusion. We determined the mechanism and structural determinants for ABHD13-mediated deacylation and substrate selectivity towards SNAP25b, and identified a novel mechanism of acyl chain extraction for integral membrane deacylases. This is the first report of deacylase selectivity mapped to a single amino acid position in full-length proteins.

molecular biology↗

Design of peptide-based PAC1 antagonists combining molecular dynamics simulations and a biologically relevant cell-based assay

The PACAP receptor PAC1 is a Gs-coupled family B1 GPCR for which the highest-affinity endogenous peptide ligands are the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptides PACAP38 and PACAP27, and whose most abundant endogenous ligand is PACAP38. PACAP action at PAC1 is implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders, atherosclerosis, pain chronification, and protection from neurodegeneration and ischemia. As PACAP also interacts with two related receptors, VPAC1 and VPAC2, highly selective ligands, both agonists and antagonists, for PAC1 have been sought. To date, the peptide PACAP(6-38) and polypeptide M65, which is related to maxadilan, a sandfly vasodilator peptide, have been identified as selective for PAC1. Several non-peptide small molecule compounds (SMOLs) have been reported to be specific antagonists at PAC1, albeit their specificities have not been rigorously documented. Here, we present a platform of cellular assays for the screening of biologically relevant antagonists at PAC1 and show that some currently proposed SMOL antagonists do not have activity in this cell reporter assay, while we confirm that PACAP(6-38) and M65 are competitive antagonists. We have used this assay system to explore other peptide antagonists at PAC1, guided by molecular dynamics analysis of the PACAP-PAC1 interaction based on cryo-EM structural models of PAC1 complexed with a number of biologically active ligands. The affinity-trap model for the PAC1-ligand interaction successfully predicts the engagement behavior of PACAP27 and PACAP38 peptide-based PAC1 inhibitors. In particular, C-terminal deletants of PACAP(6-38) that maintain equipotency to PACAP(6-38) allow the shorter sequence to function as a scaffold for further peptide-based antagonist exploration.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

In vivo functional profiling and structural characterisation of the human Glp1r A316T variant

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are effective therapies for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity, yet patient responses are variable. Variation in the human Glp1r gene might be directly linked to therapeutic responses. A naturally occurring missense variant, A316T, protects against T2D and cardiovascular disease. Here, we have generated and characterised a human Glp1r A316T mouse model. Human Glp1rA316T/A316T mice displayed lower fasting blood glucose versus wildtype littermates, even under metabolic stress, and exhibited alterations in islet cytoarchitecture and /{beta}-cell identity under a high-fat, high-sucrose diet. This was however associated with blunted responses to GLP-1RAs in vivo. Further investigations in rodent and human {beta}-cell models demonstrated that human Glp1r A316T exhibits characteristics of constitutive activation but dampened GLP-1RA responses. Results are further supported by cryo-EM analyses and molecular dynamics simulations of GLP-1R A316T structure, collectively demonstrating that the A316T variant governs basal GLP-1R activity and pharmacological responses to GLP-1R-targeting therapies. TeaserThe Glp1r A316T missense variant displays improved glucose tolerance but impaired pharmacological incretin responses in vivo.

cell biology↗

Hidden GPCR structural transitions addressed by multiple walker supervised molecular dynamics (mwSuMD)

The structural basis for the pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the most abundant membrane proteins and the target of about 35% of approved drugs, is still a matter of intense study. What makes GPCRs challenging to study is the inherent flexibility and the metastable nature of interaction with extra-and intracellular partners that drive their effects. Here, we present a molecular dynamics (MD) adaptive sampling algorithm, namely multiple walker supervised molecular dynamics (mwSuMD), to address complex structural transitions involving GPCRs without energy input. We first report the binding and unbinding of the vasopressin peptide from its receptor V2. Successively, we present the complete transition of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) from inactive to active, agonist and Gs-bound state, and the GDP release from Gs. To our knowledge, this is the first time the whole sequence of events leading from an inactive GPCR to the GDP release is simulated without any energy bias. We demonstrate that mwSuMD can address complex binding processes intrinsically linked to protein dynamics out of reach of classic MD.

bioinformatics↗

Is The Stalk of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Druggable?

The SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein (SP) is the vector of the virus infectivity. The high propensity to mutate in key regions responsible for the recognition of the human angiotensinconverting enzyme 2 (hACE2) or the antibodies produced by the immune system following infection or vaccination makes subunit 1 of the SP a difficult to target and, to date, efforts have not delivered any ACE2 binding inhibitor yet. The inherent flexibility of the stalk region, within subunit S2, is key to SARS-CoV-2 high infectivity because it facilitates the receptor binding domain encounter with ACE2. Thus, it could be a valuable therapeutic target. By employing a fragment-based strategy, we computationally studied the druggability of the conserved part of the SP stalk by means of an integrated approach that combines molecular docking with high-throughput molecular dynamics simulations. Our results suggest that the druggability of the stalk is challenging and provide the structural basis for such difficulty.

bioinformatics↗

Understanding The Role of Heparinoids on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein through Molecular Dynamics Simulations

The pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to pose a threat, with an estimated number of deaths exceeding 5 million. SARS-CoV-2 entry into the cell is mediated by its transmembrane spike glycoprotein (S protein), and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on the human cell surface. The extracellular heparan sulphate (EcHS) enhances the S protein binding through a mechanism that is still unknown. Surprisingly, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and HS in the disaccharide form (dHS) hinder the S protein binding to ACE2, despite the similarity with EcHS. We investigated the molecular mechanism behind this inhibition through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to understand the interaction pattern of the heparinoids with S protein and ACE2 receptor.

bioinformatics↗

Dynamics of GLP-1R peptide agonist engagement are correlated with kinetics of G protein activation

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) has broad physiological roles and is a validated target for treatment of metabolic disorders. Despite recent advances in GLP-1R structure elucidation, detailed mechanistic understanding of how different peptides generate profound differences in G protein-mediated signalling is still lacking. Here we have combined cryo-electron microscopy, molecular dynamics simulations, receptor mutagenesis and pharmacological assays, to interrogate the mechanism and consequences of GLP-1R binding by four peptide agonists; glucagon-like peptide-1, oxyntomodulin, exendin-4 and exendin-P5. These data revealed that distinctions in peptide N-terminal interactions and dynamics with the GLP-1R transmembrane domain are reciprocally associated with differences in the allosteric coupling to G proteins. In particular, transient interactions with residues at the base of the binding cavity correlate with enhanced kinetics for G protein activation, providing a rationale for differences in G protein-mediated signalling efficacy from distinct agonists.

biochemistry↗

Partial agonism improves the anti-hyperglycaemic efficacy of an oxyntomodulin-derived GLP-1R/GCGR co-agonist

ObjectiveGlucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor (GLP-1R/GCGR) co-agonism can maximise weight loss and improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes and obesity. In this study we investigated the cellular and metabolic effects of modulating the balance between G protein activation and {beta}-arrestin-2 recruitment at GLP-1R and GCGR using oxyntomodulin (OXM)-derived co-agonists. This strategy has been previously shown to improve the duration of action of GLP-1R mono-agonists by reducing target desensitisation and downregulation. MethodsDipeptidyl dipeptidase-4 (DPP-4)-resistant OXM analogues were generated and assessed for a variety of cellular readouts. Molecular dynamic simulations were used to gain insights into the molecular interactions involved. In vivo studies were performed in mice to identify effects on glucose homeostasis and weight loss. ResultsLigand-specific reductions in {beta}-arrestin-2 recruitment led to reduced GLP-1R internalisation and prolonged glucose-lowering action in vivo. The putative benefits of GCGR agonism were retained, with equivalent weight loss compared to the GLP-1R mono-agonist liraglutide in spite of a lesser degree of food intake suppression. The compounds tested showed only a minor degree of biased agonism between G protein and {beta}-arrestin-2 recruitment at both receptors and were best classified as partial agonists for the two pathways measured. ConclusionsDiminishing {beta}-arrestin-2 recruitment may be an effective way to increase the therapeutic efficacy of GLP-1R/GCGR co-agonists. These benefits can be achieved by partial rather than biased agonism.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Deciphering the Agonist Binding Mechanism to the Adenosine A1 Receptor

Despite being amongst the most characterized G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), adenosine receptors (ARs) have always been a difficult target in drug design. To date, no agonist other than the natural effector and the diagnostic regadenoson has been approved for human use. Recently, the structure of the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) was determined in the active, Gi protein complexed state; this has important repercussions for structure-based drug design. Here, we employed supervised molecular dynamics simulations and mutagenesis experiments to extend the structural knowledge of the binding of selective agonists to A1R. Our results identify new residues involved in the association and dissociation pathway, suggest the binding mode of N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) related ligands, and highlight the dramatic effect that chemical modifications can have on the overall binding mechanism.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

A Multisite Model of Allosterism for the Adenosine A1 Receptor

Despite being a target for about one-third of approved drugs, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) still represent a tremendous reservoir for therapeutic strategies against countless diseases. For example, several cardiovascular and central nervous systems conditions could benefit from clinical agents that activate the adenosine 1 receptor (A1R), however, the pursuit of A1R agonists for clinical use are usually impeded by both on- and off-target side effects. One of the possible strategies to overcome this issue is the development of positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) capable of selectively enhancing the effect of a specific receptor subtype and triggering functional selectivity (a phenomenon also referred to as bias). Intriguingly, besides enforcing the effect of agonists upon binding to an allosteric site, most of the A1R PAMs display intrinsic partial agonism and orthosteric competition with antagonists. To rationalize this behaviour, we simulated the binding of the prototypical PAMs PD81723 and VCP171, the antagonist 13B, and the bitopic agonist VCP746. We propose that a single PAM can bind several A1R sites rather than a unique allosteric pocket, reconciling the structure-activity relationship and the mutagenesis results.

biophysics↗

Non-opioid analgesia based on Gα signalling bias

The development of therapeutic agonists for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is hampered by the propensity of GPCRs to couple to multiple intracellular signalling pathways. This promiscuous coupling leads to numerous downstream cellular effects, some of which are therapeutically undesirable. This is especially the case for adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs) whose clinical potential is undermined by the sedation and cardiorespiratory depression caused by conventional agonists. We have discovered that the A1R-selective agonist, BnOCPA, is a potent and powerful analgesic but does not cause sedation, bradycardia, hypotension or respiratory depression. This unprecedented discrimination between native A1Rs arises from BnOCPAs unique and exquisitely selective activation of Gob among the six Gi/o subtypes, and in the absence of {beta}-arrestin recruitment. BnOCPA thus demonstrates a highly-specific G-selective activation of the native A1R, sheds new light on GPCR signalling, and reveals new possibilities for the development of novel therapeutics based on the far-reaching concept of selective G agonism. Short summaryWe describe the selective activation of an adenosine A1 receptor-mediated intracellular pathway that provides potent analgesia in the absence of sedation or cardiorespiratory depression, paving the way for novel medicines based on the far-reaching concept of selective G agonism.

physiology↗