Biology subjects

Deagle, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Deagle, B..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Let the prey speak: Using PNA clamps to silence predator DNA in marine faecal diet studies

DNA metabarcoding of faeces is a powerful, non-invasive method for assessing predator diets. However, when studying the diet of generalist predators, broad PCR primers are used to amplify the wide range of potential prey species and metabarcoding outputs are often dominated by sequences from the predator. While blocking primers can be used to reduce PCR amplification of predator DNA, they frequently cause partial predator suppression and unintended prey blocking. Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamps, offer a promising, underutilised alternative by binding strongly and selectively to predator DNA to block its PCR amplification. In this study we designed and validated a novel PNA clamp targeting the 18S rRNA gene to suppress bird and mammal predator DNA in dietary samples. We tested this clamp on tissue mixtures and faecal samples from three seabird and two seal species across temperate, subantarctic, and Antarctic regions. The PNA clamp substantially increased the proportion of prey reads recovered while maintaining consistent prey community composition across all predator species. Our results demonstrate not only the general effectiveness of PNA clamps over standard blocking primers, but also provide a powerful, broadly applicable new tool to improve the accuracy in DNA diet metabarcoding studies.

Molecular Biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Revision and annotation of DNA barcode records for marine invertebrates: report of the 8th iBOL conference hackathon

The accuracy of the identification of unknown specimens using DNA barcoding and metabarcoding relies on reference libraries containing records with reliable taxonomy and sequence quality. A rampant growth in barcode data led to a stringent need for data curation, especially in taxonomically difficult groups such as marine invertebrates. A major effort in curating marine barcode data deposited in the Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) has been undertaken during the 8th International Barcode of Life Conference (Trondheim, Norway, 2019). For practical reasons, only major taxonomic groups were reviewed and annotated (crustaceans, echinoderms, molluscs, and polychaetes). The congruence of Linnean names with Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) was investigated, and the records deemed uncertain were annotated with four tags: a) MIS-ID (misidentified, mislabeled or contaminated records), b) AMBIG (ambiguous records unresolved with the current data), c) COMPLEX (species occurring in multiple BINs), and d) SHARE (barcodes shared between species). A total of 83,712 specimen records corresponding to 7,576 species were reviewed and 39% of the species were tagged (7% MIS-ID, 17% AMBIG, 14% COMPLEX, and 1% SHARE). High percentages (>50%) of AMBIG tags were recorded in gastropods, whereas COMPLEX tags dominated in crustaceans and polychaetes. This high proportion of tagged species reflects either flaws in the barcoding workflow (e.g., misidentification, cross -contamination) or taxonomic difficulties (e.g., synonyms, undescribed species). Although data curation is crucial for barcode applications, such manual efforts of reviewing large datasets are not sustainable and the implementation of automated solutions to the furthest possible extent is hi ghly desirable.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: how should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?

Advances in DNA sequencing technology have revolutionised the field of molecular analysis of trophic interactions and it is now possible to recover counts of food DNA barcode sequences from a wide range of dietary samples. But what do these counts mean? To obtain an accurate estimate of a consumers diet should we work strictly with datasets summarising the frequency of occurrence of different food taxa, or is it possible to use the relative number of sequences? Both approaches are applied in the dietary metabarcoding literature, but occurrence data is often promoted as a more conservative and reliable option due to taxa-specific biases in recovery of sequences. Here, we point out that diet summaries based on occurrence data overestimate the importance of food consumed in small quantities (potentially including low-level contaminants) and are sensitive to the count threshold used to define an occurrence. Our simulations indicate that even with recovery biases incorporated, using relative read abundance (RRA) information can provide a more accurate view of population-level diet in many scenarios. The ideas presented here highlight the need to consider all sources of bias and to justify the methods used to interpret count data in dietary metabarcoding studies. We encourage researchers to continue to addressing methodological challenges, and acknowledge unanswered questions to help spur future investigations in this rapidly developing area of research.

ecology↗