Biology subjects

DeMeo, D. L.

Publications and source records attributed to DeMeo, D. L..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

New Statistical Methods for Constructing Robust Differential Correlation Networks

The interplay among microRNAs (miRNAs) plays an important role in the developments of complex human diseases. Co-expression networks can characterize the interactions among miRNAs. Differential correlation network is a powerful tool to investigate the differences of co-expression networks between cases and controls. To construct a differential correlation network, the Fishers Z-transformation test is usually used. However, the Fishers Z-transformation test requires the normality assumption, the violation of which would result in inflated Type I error rate. Several bootstrapping-based improvements for Fishers Z test have been proposed. However, these methods are too computationally intensive to be used to construct differential correlation networks for high-throughput genomic data. In this article, we proposed six novel robust equal-correlation tests that are computationally efficient. The systematic simulation studies and a real microRNA data analysis showed that one of the six proposed tests (ST5) overall performed better than other methods.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Expanded genetic landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reveals heterogeneous cell type and phenotype associations

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the leading cause of respiratory mortality worldwide. Genetic risk loci provide novel insights into disease pathogenesis. To broaden COPD genetic risk loci discovery and identify cell type and phenotype associations we performed a genome-wide association study in 35,735 cases and 222,076 controls from the UK Biobank and additional studies from the International COPD Genetics Consortium. We identified 82 loci with P value < 5x10-8; 47 were previously described in association with either COPD or population-based lung function. Of the remaining 35 novel loci, 13 were associated with lung function in 79,055 individuals from the SpiroMeta consortium. Using gene expression and regulation data, we identified enrichment for loci in lung tissue, smooth muscle and alveolar type II cells. We found 9 shared genomic regions between COPD and asthma and 5 between COPD and pulmonary fibrosis. COPD genetic risk loci clustered into groups of quantitative imaging features and comorbidity associations. Our analyses provide further support to the genetic susceptibility and heterogeneity of COPD.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Detecting Differential Variable microRNAs via Model-Based Clustering

Identifying genomic probes (e.g., DNA methylation marks) is becoming a new approach to detect novel genomic risk factors for complex human diseases. The F test is the standard equal-variance test in Statistics. For high-throughput genomic data, the probe-wise F test has been successfully used to detect biologically relevant DNA methylation marks that have different variances between two groups of subjects (e.g., cases vs. controls). In addition to DNA methylation, microRNA is another mechanism of epigenetics. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have identified differentially variable (DV) microRNAs. In this article, we proposed a novel model-based clustering to improve the power of the probe-wise F test to detect DV microRNAs. We imposed special structures on covariance matrices for each cluster of microRNAs based on the prior information about the relationship between variance in cases and variance in controls and about the independence among cases and controls. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed method is the first clustering algorithm that aims to detect DV genomic probes. Simulation studies showed that the proposed method outperformed the probe-wise F test and had certain robustness to the violation of the normality assumption. Based on two real datasets about human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we identified 7 DV-only microRNAs (hsa-miR-1826, hsa-miR-191, hsa-miR-194-star, hsa-miR-222, hsa-miR-502-3p, hsa-miR-93, and hsa-miR-99b) using the proposed method, one (hsa-miR-1826) of which has not yet been reported to relate to HCC in the literature.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Gene regulatory network analysis identifies sex-linked differences in colon cancer drug metabolism processes

Significant sex differences are observed in colon cancer, and understanding these differences is essential to advance disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Males have a higher risk of developing colon cancer and a lower survival rate than women. However, the molecular features that drive these sex differences are poorly understood. We used both transcript-based and gene regulatory network methods to analyze RNA-Seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas for 445 patients with colon cancer. We compared gene expression between tumors in men and women and found no significant sex differences except for sex-chromosome genes. We then inferred patient-specific gene regulatory networks, and found significant regulatory differences between males and females, with drug and xenobiotics metabolism via cytochrome P450 pathways more strongly targeted in females. This finding was validated in a dataset that included 1,193 patients from five independent studies. While targeting of the drug metabolism pathway did not change the overall survival for males treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, females with greater targeting had an increase in 10-year overall survival probability, with 89% (95% CI: 78%-100%) survival compared to 61% (95% CI: 45%-82%) for women with lower targeting, respectively (p=0.034). Our network analysis uncovered patterns of transcriptional regulation that differentiate male and female colon cancer. Most importantly, targeting of the drug metabolism pathway was predictive of survival in women who received adjuvant chemotherapy. This network-based approach can be used to investigate the molecular features that drive sex differences in other cancers and complex diseases.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Integrative genomics analysis identifies ACVR1B as a candidate causal gene of emphysema distribution in non-alpha 1-antitrypsin deficient smokers

BackgroundSeveral genetic risk loci associated with emphysema apico-basal distribution (EABD) have been identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), but the biological functions of these variants are unknown. To characterize gene regulatory functions of EABD-associated variants, we integrated EABD GWAS results with 1) a multi-tissue panel of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) from subjects with COPD and the GTEx project and 2) epigenomic marks from 127 cell types in the Roadmap Epigenomics project. Functional validation was performed for a variant near ACVR1B.\n\nResultsSNPs from 168 loci with P-values<5x10-5 in the largest GWAS meta-analysis of EABD (Boueiz A. et al, AJRCCM 2017) were analyzed. 54 loci overlapped eQTL regions from our multi-tissue panel, and 7 of these loci showed a high probability of harboring a single, shared GWAS and eQTL causal variant (colocalization posterior probability[≥]0.9). 17 cell types exhibited greater than expected overlap between EABD loci and DNase-I hypersensitive peaks, DNaseI hotspots, enhancer marks, or digital DNaseI footprints (permutation P-value < 0.05), with the strongest enrichment observed in CD4+, CD8+, and regulatory T cells. A region near ACVR1B demonstrated significant colocalization with a lung eQTL and overlapped DNase-I hypersensitive regions in multiple cell types, and reporter assays in human bronchial epithelial cells confirmed allele-specific regulatory activity for the lead variant, rs7962469.\n\nConclusionsIntegrative analysis highlights candidate causal genes, regulatory variants, and cell types that may contribute to the pathogenesis of emphysema distribution. These findings will enable more accurate functional validation studies and better understanding of emphysema distribution biology.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2017

Understanding Tissue-specific Gene Regulation

Although all human tissues carry out common processes, tissues are distinguished by gene expres-sion patterns, implying that distinct regulatory programs control tissue-specificity. In this study, we investigate gene expression and regulation across 38 tissues profiled in the Genotype-Tissue Expression project. We find that network edges (transcription factor to target gene connections) have higher tissue-specificity than network nodes (genes) and that regulating nodes (transcription factors) are less likely to be expressed in a tissue-specific manner as compared to their targets (genes). Gene set enrichment analysis of network targeting also indicates that regulation of tissue-specific function is largely independent of transcription factor expression. In addition, tissue-specific genes are not highly targeted in their corresponding tissue-network. However, they do assume bottleneck positions due to variability in transcription factor targeting and the influence of non-canonical regulatory interactions. These results suggest that tissue-specificity is driven by context-dependent regulatory paths, providing transcriptional control of tissue-specific processes.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2016

Transcriptional landscape of cell lines and their tissues of origin

Cell lines are an indispensable tool in biomedical research and often used as surrogates for tissues. An important question is how well a cell lines transcriptional and regulatory processes reflect those of its tissue of origin. We analyzed RNA-Seq data from GTEx for 127 paired Epstein-Barr virus transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines and whole blood samples; and 244 paired fibroblast cell lines and skin biopsies. A combination of gene expression and network analyses shows that while cell lines carry the expression signatures of their primary tissues, albeit at reduced levels, they also exhibit changes in their patterns of transcription factor regulation. Cell cycle genes are over-expressed in cell lines compared to primary tissue, and they have a reduction of repressive transcription factor targeting. Our results provide insight into the expression and regulatory alterations observed in cell lines and suggest that these changes should be considered when using cell lines as models.\n\nHighlightsO_LICell lines differ from their source tissues in gene expression and regulation\nC_LIO_LIDistinct cell lines share altered patterns of cell cycle regulation\nC_LIO_LICell cycle genes are less strongly targeted by repressive TFs in cell lines\nC_LIO_LICell lines share expression with their source tissue, but at reduced levels\nC_LI

genomics↗

bioRxiv2016

Sexual dimorphism in gene expression and regulatory networks across human tissues

Sexual dimorphism manifests in many diseases and may drive sex-specific therapeutic responses. To understand the molecular basis of sexual dimorphism, we conducted a comprehensive assessment of gene expression and regulatory network modeling in 31 tissues using 8716 human transcriptomes from GTEx. We observed sexually dimorphic patterns of gene expression involving as many as 60% of autosomal genes, depending on the tissue. Interestingly, sex hormone receptors do not exhibit sexually dimorphic expression in most tissues; however, differential network targeting by hormone receptors and other transcription factors (TFs) captures their downstream sexually dimorphic gene expression. Furthermore, differential network wiring was found extensively in several tissues, particularly in brain, in which not all regions exhibit strong differential expression. This systems-based analysis provides a new perspective on the drivers of sexual dimorphism, one in which a repertoire of TFs plays important roles in sex-specific rewiring of gene regulatory networks.\n\nHighlightsO_LISexual dimorphism manifests in both gene expression and gene regulatory networks\nC_LIO_LISubstantial sexual dimorphism in regulatory networks was found in several tissues\nC_LIO_LIMany differentially regulated genes are not differentially expressed\nC_LIO_LISex hormone receptors do not exhibit sexually dimorphic expression in most tissues\nC_LI

genomics↗