bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

DeLeo, V. L.

Publications and source records attributed to DeLeo, V. L..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Genetic variation in phenology of wild Arabidopsis thaliana plants

Phenology and the timing of development are often under selection. However, the relative contributions of genotype, environment, and prior developmental transitions to variance in the phenology of wild plants is largely unknown. Individual components of phenology (e.g., germination) might be loosely related with the timing of maturation due to variation in prior developmental transitions. Given widespread evidence that genetic variation in life history is adaptive, we investigated to what degree experimentally measured genetic variation in Arabidopsis phenology predicts phenology of plants in the wild. As a proxy of phenology, we obtained collection dates from nature of 227 naturally inbred Arabidopsis thaliana accessions from across Eurasia. We compared this phenology in nature with experimental data on the descendant inbred lines that we synthesized from two new and 155 published controlled experiments. We tested whether the genetic variation in flowering and germination timing from experiments predicted the phenology of the same lines in nature. We found that genetic variation in phenology from controlled experiments significantly predicts day of collection from wild individuals, as a proxy for date of flowering, across Eurasia. However, local variation in collection dates within a region was not explained by genetic variance in phenology in experiments, suggesting high plasticity across small-scale environmental gradients or complex interactions between the timing of different developmental transitions. While experiments have shown phenology is under selection, understanding the subtle environmental and stochastic effects on phenology may help to clarify the heritability and evolution of phenological traits in nature.

evolutionary biology↗

Interpretable and predictive models to harness the life science data revolution

The proliferation of high-dimensional data in ecology and evolutionary biology raises the promise of statistical and machine learning models that are highly predictive and interpretable. However, high-dimensional data are commonly burdened with an inherent trade-off: in-sample prediction of outcomes will improve as additional variables are included in the model, but this may come at the cost of poor predictive accuracy and limited generalizability for future or unsampled observations (out-of-sample prediction). To confront this problem of overfitting, sparse models can focus on key variables by correctly placing low weight on unimportant variables. We competed nine methods to quantify their performance in variable selection and prediction using simulated data with different sample sizes, numbers of variables, and strengths of effects. Overfitting was typical for many methods and simulation scenarios. Despite this, in-sample and out-of-sample prediction converged on the true predictive target for simulations with more observations, larger causal effects, and fewer variables. Accurate variable selection to support process-based understanding will be unattainable for many realistic sampling schemes in ecology and evolution. We use our analyses to characterize data attributes for which statistical learning is possible, and illustrate how some sparse methods can achieve predictive accuracy while mitigating and learning the extent of overfitting.

genomics↗

Climate biogeography of Arabidopsis thaliana: linking distribution models, individual performance, and life history

AIMPatterns of individual variation are key to testing hypotheses about the mechanisms underlying biogeographic patterns. However, it is challenging to gather data on individual-level variation at large spatial scales. Model organisms are potentially important systems for biogeographical studies, given the available range-wide natural history collections, and the importance of providing biogeographical context to their genetic and phenotypic diversity. LOCATIONGlobal TAXONArabidopsis thaliana ("Arabidopsis") METHODSWe fit occurrence records to climate data, and then projected the distribution of Arabidopsis under last glacial maximum, current, and future climates. We confronted model predictions with individual performance measured on 2,194 herbarium specimens, and we asked whether predicted suitability was associated with life-history and genomic variation measured on [~]900 natural accessions. RESULTSThe most important climate variables constraining the Arabidopsis distribution were winter cold in northern and high elevation regions and summer heat in southern regions. Herbarium specimens from regions with lower habitat suitability in both northern and southern regions were smaller, supporting the hypothesis that the distribution of Arabidopsis is constrained by climate-associated factors. Climate anomalies partly explained interannual variation in herbarium specimen size, but these did not closely correspond to local limiting factors identified in the distribution model. Late-flowering genotypes were absent from the lowest suitability regions, suggesting slower life histories are only viable closer to the center of the realized niche. We identified glacial refugia farther north than previously recognized, as well as refugia concordant with previous population genetic findings. Lower latitude populations, known to be genetically distinct, are most threatened by future climate change. The recently colonized range of Arabidopsis was well-predicted by our native-range model applied to certain regions but not others, suggesting it has colonized novel climates. MAIN CONCLUSIONSIntegration of distribution models with performance data from vast natural history collections is a route forward for testing biogeographical hypotheses about species distributions and their relationship with evolutionary fitness across large scales.

ecology↗

Effects of two centuries of global environmental variation on phenology and physiology of Arabidopsis thaliana

Intraspecific trait variation is caused by genetic and plastic responses to environment. This intraspecific diversity is captured in immense natural history collections, giving us a window into trait variation across continents and through centuries of environmental shifts. Here we tested if hypotheses based on life history and the leaf economics spectrum explain intraspecific trait changes across global spatiotemporal environmental gradients. We measured phenotypes on a 216-year time series of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions from across the native range and applied spatially varying coefficient models to quantify region-specific trends in trait coordination and trait responses to climate gradients. All traits exhibited significant change across space and/or through time. For example, {delta}15N decreased over time across much of the range and leaf C:N increased, consistent with predictions based on anthropogenic changes in land use and atmosphere. Plants were collected later in the growing season in more recent years in many regions, possibly because populations shifted toward more spring germination and summer flowering as opposed to fall germination and spring flowering. When climate variables were considered, collection dates were earlier in warmer years, while summer rainfall had opposing associations with collection date depending on regions. There was only a modest correlation among traits, indicating a lack of a single life history/physiology axis. Nevertheless, leaf C:N was low for summer- versus spring-collected plants, consistent with a life history-physiology axis from slow-growing winter annuals to fast-growing spring/summer annuals. Regional heterogeneity in phenotype trends indicates complex responses to spatiotemporal environmental gradients potentially due to geographic genetic variation and climate interactions with other aspects of environment. Our study demonstrates how natural history collections can be used to broadly characterize trait responses to environment, revealing heterogeneity in response to anthropogenic change.

ecology↗