Biology subjects

De Havas, J.

Publications and source records attributed to De Havas, J..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

TMS-Evoked Corticospinal Beta Oscillations in Humans Recorded from Muscles

BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can entrain oscillatory brain activity, offering a promising approach to study motor-related neural oscillations such as beta rhythms. However, how TMS-induced corticospinal oscillations are generated, propagated, and related to endogenous activity remains unclear, partly due to limitations in brain recording techniques. Recording muscle activity provides an alternative and physiologically grounded window into corticospinal dynamics. MethodsWe investigated whether subthreshold TMS over the motor cortex induces corticospinal oscillatory activity detectable in muscles, and whether these responses share neural generators with endogenous beta rhythms. Single-pulse subthreshold TMS was applied over the motor cortex in healthy participants while electromyography (EMG) was recorded from tonically active muscles. Stimulation intensity, coil orientation, and stimulation site were systematically varied. Concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) was used to assess cortical responses and corticomuscular transmission. In additional experiments, advanced EMG techniques were employed to track motor neuron pools and characterize how TMS-evoked oscillations are transmitted at the motor unit level. ResultsTMS elicited a robust and short-latency increase in beta-band activity in the EMG. The analysis of the elicited muscle responses and the comparison of results across different TMS configurations indicate that the beta responses resulted from activation of inhibitory interneurons in the targeted primary motor cortex. Importantly, the characteristics of cortico-muscular coherence and beta projection to the muscles indicate that the elicited beta responses with TMS have same cortical sources as endogenously generated beta activity. ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that muscle recordings provide a sensitive and physiologically meaningful readout of TMS-induced corticospinal beta oscillations.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Neural dynamics of illusory tactile pulling sensations

The sensation of directional forces and their associated sensorimotor commands are inextricably intertwined, complicating the identification of brain circuits responsible for tactile pulling sensations. One hypothesis is that, like tactile frequency discrimination, pulling sensations are generated by early sensory-frontal activity. Alternatively, they may be generated later in the somatosensory association cortex. To dissociate these accounts and uncouple the pulling sensation from unrelated but correlated sensory and motor processing, we combined high-density EEG with an oddball paradigm and asymmetric vibration, which creates an illusory sensation of the hand being directionally pulled. Oddballs that created a pulling sensation in the opposite direction to common stimuli were compared to the same oddballs in the context of neutral common stimuli (symmetric vibration) and to neutral oddballs. Brain responses to having directional pulling expectations violated by directional stimuli were therefore isolated. Contrary to the sensory-frontal account, frontal N140 brain activity was actually larger for neutral than pulling oddballs. Instead, pulling sensations were associated with amplitude and latency modulations of midline P200 and P3b potentials, and specifically, to contralateral parietal lobe activity 280ms post-stimulus. The timing of this activity suggested pulling sensations involve spatial processing, such as tactile remapping between coordinate frames. Source localization showed this activity to be centered on the postcentral sulcus, superior parietal lobule and intraparietal sulcus, suggesting that pulling sensations arise via the processing of body position, tactile orientation and peripersonal space. Our results demonstrate how tactile illusions can uniquely disambiguate parietal contributions to somatosensation by removing unrelated sensory processing. Significance statementThe neural mechanisms of tactile pulling sensations are poorly understood. Competing early sensory-frontal and later somatosensory association cortex accounts are hard to dissociate due to confounding sensory and motor signals present when forces are applied to the skin. Here, we used EEG and a novel asymmetric vibration approach to induce an illusory pulling sensation, which circumvents these issues. We found that pulling sensations were associated with parietal lobe activity 280ms post-stimulus and modulations of the P200. The timing and location of this activity suggested that pulling sensations necessitate spatial processing and supported a somatosensory association cortex account of the pulling sensation.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Intermanual transfer of visuomotor learning is facilitated by a cognitive strategy

Humans continuously adapt their movement to a novel environment by recalibrating their sensorimotor system. Recent evidence, however, shows that explicit planning to compensate for external changes, i.e. a cognitive strategy, can also aid performance. If such a strategy is indeed planned in external space, it should improve performance in an effector independent manner. We tested this hypothesis by examining whether promoting a cognitive strategy during a visual-force adaptation task performed in one hand can facilitate learning for the opposite hand. Participants rapidly adjusted the height of visual bar on screen to a target level by isometrically exerting force on a handle using their right hand. Visuomotor gain increased during the task and participants learned the increased gain. Visual feedback was continuously provided for one group, while for another group only the endpoint of the force trajectory was presented. The latter has been reported to promote cognitive strategy use. We found that endpoint feedback produced stronger intermanual transfer of learning and slower response times than continuous feedback. In a separate experiment, we confirmed that the aftereffect is indeed reduced when only endpoint feedback is provided, a finding that has been consistently observed when cognitive strategies are used. The results suggest that intermanual transfer can be facilitated by a cognitive strategy. This indicates that the behavioral observation of intermanual transfer can be achieved either by forming an effector-independent motor representation, or by sharing an effector-independent cognitive strategy between the hands. New and noteworthyThe causes and consequences of cognitive strategy use for motor learning are poorly understood. We tested whether a visuomotor task learned using a strategy generalizes across effectors. Visual feedback was manipulated to enhance the use of a cognitive strategy. Learning using a cognitive strategy for one hand transferred to the task performed by the un-learned hand. Our result suggests that intermanual transfer can also result from a common cognitive strategy used to control both hands.

neuroscience↗