bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

De Backer, J.-F.

Publications and source records attributed to De Backer, J.-F..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Reduced dopaminergic reinforcement, not learning capacity, limits operant learning in aging Drosophila

Aging is associated with a progressive decline in cognitive function, including the ability to adapt behavior based on its consequences. While classical conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster has provided key insights into reinforcement learning, how aging impacts operant learning and adjusting behavior based on action outcomes remains unclear. Here, we used a closed-loop optogenetic paradigm to test how aging affects operant learning and the role of dopaminergic neurons (DANs; PPL1 and PAM) in this process. Activation of distinct DAN subsets revealed that both young and aged flies retain PPL1-dependent avoidance learning, indicating preserved action-outcome learning with age. However, learning in aged flies depended on prolonged reinforcement: unlike young flies, they failed to learn under shorter optogenetic stimulation durations, suggesting an aging-associated reduced dopaminergic reinforcement rather than a loss of learning capacity. Moreover, reducing mitochondrial antioxidant capacity via SOD2 knockdown in PPL1 neurons phenocopied the aging-related deficit, implicating oxidative stress in impaired reinforcement signaling. In contrast, broad PAM neuron activation drove robust learning across ages and stimulation regimes. Nevertheless, functional dissection of PAM subpopulations revealed subtype-specific aging-associated vulnerability within dopaminergic circuits. In line with the behavioral data, PPL1 but not PAM neurons exhibited age-dependent reductions in cell size. Together, our findings suggest that aging selectively reduces dopaminergic reinforcement in a DAN subtype-dependent manner while preserving the capacity for operant learning. Increasing reinforcement length rescues this deficit, indicating that altered dopaminergic signaling, rather than impaired learning capacity, is a key driver of age-related cognitive decline.

neuroscience↗

Adenosine signaling in glia modulates metabolic state-dependent behavior in Drosophila

An animals metabolic state strongly influences its behavior. Hungry animals prioritize food seeking and feeding behaviors, while sated animals suppress these behaviors to engage in other activities. Additionally, neuronal activity and synaptic transmission are among the most energy expensive processes. Yet neurons do not uptake nutrients from the circulation. Instead, glia fulfill this highly evolutionary conserved function. Recent studies have shown that glia can modulate neuronal activity and behavior. However, how different glia subtypes sense metabolic state and modulate neurons and behavior is incompletely understood. Here, we unravel two types of glia-mediated modulation of metabolic state-dependent behavior. In food-deprived flies, astrocyte-like and perineurial glia promote foraging and feeding, respectively, while cortex glia suppress these behaviors. We further show that adenosine and adenosine receptor modulate intracellular calcium levels in these glia subtypes, which ultimately controls behavior. This study reveals a new mechanism how different glia subtypes sense the metabolic state of the animal and modulate its behavior accordingly.

neuroscience↗

Specific octopaminergic neurons arbitrate between perseverance and reward in hungry Drosophila

In pursuit of palatable food, hungry animals mobilize significant energy resources and overcome obstacles, exhaustion and fear. Their perseverance depends on metabolic state, internal motivation and the expected benefit. Sustained commitment to a trying task is crucial, however, disengagement from one behavior to engage into another can be essential for optimal adaptation and survival. How neural circuits allow prioritizing perseverance over withdrawal based on the animals need is not understood. Using a single fly spherical treadmill, we show that hungry flies display increasing perseverance to track a food odor in the repeated absence of the predicted food reward. While this perseverance is mediated by a group of dopaminergic neurons, a subset of neurons expressing octopamine, the invertebrate counterpart of noradrenaline, provide reward feedback and counteract dopamine-motivated food seeking. Our data and modeling suggest that two important neuromodulators tally internal and external signals to coordinate motivation-dependent antagonistic behavioral drives: perseverance vs. change of behavior.\n\n\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=87 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/259119_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (21K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9833e1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7616d4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d4e8bforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fc615c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LILack of reward stimulates perseverance, and not quitting.\nC_LIO_LIDopaminergic neurons previously implicated in aversive learning promote perseverance.\nC_LIO_LISugar responsive octopaminergic neurons directly counteract perseverant odor tracking through a downstream inhibitory neuron.\nC_LIO_LIComputational modeling supports a simple neural circuit featuring antagonistic functions for dopamine and octopamine as tallies of expense and gain.\nC_LI

neuroscience↗