Biology subjects

Davidson, I. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Davidson, I. F..

14 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

A Modular Framework for Automated Segmentation and Analysis of AFM Imaging of Chromatin Organization

Chromatin organization underlies essential genome functions, but its nanoscale organization remains challenging to capture and quantify with precision. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) offers direct structural readouts of DNA and chromatin, yet translating these rich images into reproducible biological metrics has been limited by the lack of standardized, scalable analysis tools. Here we present DNAsight, an automated analysis framework that integrates machine learning (ML)-based segmentation with modular, base-pair-calibrated quantification of DNA spatial organization, looping, nucleosome spacing, and protein clustering. Applied across diverse chromatin-associated proteins, DNAsight reveals protein-specific organizational signatures, including topology-dependent compaction by integration host factor (IHF), condition-dependent changes in loop-like DNA structures in cohesin-CTCF-precocious dissociation of sisters 5A (PDS5A) reactions, and promoter-driven multimerization of GAGA factor (GAF) clusters. The framework further enables direct extraction of nucleosome spacing distributions from raw AFM images, providing a label-free route to investigate chromatin fiber architecture. Together, these advances establish DNAsight as a generalizable and scalable approach for converting AFM measurements into quantitative insights into the physical principles of chromatin organization. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=79 SRC="FIGDIR/small/708946v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1225883org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e1041dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d53d18org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9e0a2a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2025

Ultrafast CTCF dynamics control cohesin barrier function

Genomes are organized into chromatin loops through cohesin-mediated extrusion, with CTCF acting as a polar boundary element. As cohesin approaches CTCF at kilobase-per-second speeds, it must rapidly choose whether to stall or bypass. How CTCF encodes this probabilistic decision within a brief encounter window has remained unclear. Here we show that CTCF governs this probabilistic outcome by rapidly sampling a dynamic ensemble of conformations generated by spontaneous rearrangements of its DNA-binding zinc fingers. This ensemble is tuned by DNA sequence, CpG methylation, nearby nucleosomes, and the cohesin regulator PDS5A before cohesin engagement. Upon cohesin binding, PDS5A enhances loop-anchor mechanical stability, reinforcing orientation-dependent boundaries. These findings establish conformational ensemble tuning, rather than static occupancy, as a regulatory principle linking base pair-scale motions to megabase-scale genome organization. One sentence summaryChromatin boundary function is governed not by CTCF occupancy alone, but by a tunable ensemble of DNA-bound conformations that probabilistically gates cohesin capture.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2025

PDS5 proteins control genome architecture by limiting the lifetime of cohesin-NIPBL complexes

Cohesin-NIPBL complexes extrude genomic DNA into loops that are constrained by CTCF boundaries. This process has important regulatory functions and weakens the separation between euchromatic and heterochromatic compartments. Cohesin can also bind PDS5A or PDS5B, which do not support loop extrusion but are required for the formation of CTCF boundaries. How PDS5 proteins perform this function is unknown. Here we show by in vitro single-molecule imaging that PDS5 proteins stop loop extrusion by facilitating the dissociation of NIPBL from cohesin. Hi-C experiments suggest that this function is required for the establishment of CTCF boundaries in cells. In silico modelling indicates that PDS5 proteins enable the separation between compartments by limiting cohesins velocity and chromatin-residence time. The degree of this compartmentalization depends on the frequency with which chromatin is extruded relative to the time it takes for compartments to form. These results identify PDS5 proteins as key regulators of genome organization. HighlightsO_LIPDS5 proteins stop loop extrusion by facilitating dissociation of NIPBL from cohesin. C_LIO_LIPDS5 proteins strengthen CTCF boundaries by limiting the lifetime of cohesin-NIPBL. C_LIO_LIPDS5 proteins regulate compartmentalization. C_LIO_LICompartmentalization is governed by polymer relaxation and loop extrusion dynamics. C_LI

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Two CTCF motifs impede cohesin-mediated DNA loop extrusion

Cohesin extrudes DNA into loops and is positioned along the genome by stalling at CTCF upon encountering its N-terminal region (NTR). The mechanism underlying this stalling, however, is unresolved. Using single-molecule assays that monitor DNA loop extrusion (LE) in the presence of NTR fragments, we identify two amino acid motifs, YDF and KTYQR, that hinder LE. KTYQR is found to fully impede LE activity, while YDF hinders cohesin to complete LE step cycles and converts cohesin into a unidirectional extruder by strengthening the affinity of STAG1 to DNA. We thus identify two distinct NTR motifs that stall LE via different yet synergistic mechanisms, highlighting the multifaceted ways employed by CTCF to modulate LE to shape and regulate genomes. One-Sentence SummaryThe N-terminus of CTCF employs two independent motifs that synergistically stall cohesin-mediated DNA loop extrusion.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2024

All eukaryotic SMC proteins induce a twist of -0.6 at each DNA-loop-extrusion step

Eukaryotes carry three types of Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes, condensin, cohesin, and SMC5/6, which are ATP-dependent motor proteins that remodel the genome via DNA loop extrusion. SMCs modulate DNA supercoiling, but it has remained incompletely understood how this is achieved. Here we present a single-molecule magnetic tweezers assay that directly measures how much twist is induced by an individual SMC in each loop-extrusion step. We demonstrate that all three SMC complexes induce the same large negative twist (i.e., a linking number change {Delta}Lk of -0.6 at each loop-extrusion step) into the extruded loop, independent of step size. Using ATP-hydrolysis mutants and non-hydrolysable ATP analogues, we find that ATP binding is the twist-inducing event during the ATPase cycle, which coincides with the force-generating loop-extrusion step. The fact that all three eukaryotic SMC proteins induce the same amount of twist indicates a common DNA-loop-extrusion mechanism among these SMC complexes.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2024

Cohesin supercoils DNA during loop extrusion

Cohesin extrudes genomic DNA into loops that promote chromatin assembly, gene regulation and recombination. Here we show that cohesin introduces negative supercoils into extruded DNA. Supercoiling requires engagement of cohesins ATPase heads, DNA clamping by these heads, and a DNA binding site on cohesins hinge, indicating that cohesin supercoils DNA when constraining it between the hinge and the clamp. Our results suggest that DNA extrusion stops once cohesin reaches its stall torque during supercoiling, and a cohesin mutant predicted to stall at lower torque forms shorter loops in cells. These results indicate that supercoiling is an integral part of the loop extrusion mechanism and that cohesin controls genome architecture not only by looping DNA but also by supercoiling it.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2022

Cohesin mediates DNA loop extrusion and sister chromatid cohesion by distinct mechanisms

Cohesin connects CTCF binding sites and other genomic loci in cis to form chromatin loops, and replicated DNA molecules in trans to mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Whether cohesin uses distinct or related mechanisms to perform these functions is unknown. Here we describe a cohesin hinge mutant, which can extrude DNA into loops but is unable to mediate cohesion. Our results suggest that the latter defect arises during cohesion establishment. The observation that cohesins cohesion and loop extrusion activities can be separated indicates that cohesin uses distinct mechanisms to perform these two functions. Unexpectedly, the same hinge mutant can also not be stopped by CTCF boundaries as well as wildtype cohesin. This suggests that cohesion establishment and cohesins interaction with CTCF boundaries depend on related mechanisms and raises the possibility that both require transient hinge opening to entrap DNA inside the cohesin ring.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2022

CTCF is a DNA-tension-dependent barrier to cohesin-mediated DNA loop extrusion

In eukaryotes, genomic DNA is extruded into loops by cohesin1. By restraining this process, the DNA-binding protein CTCF generates topologically associating domains (TADs)2-4 that play key roles in gene regulation and recombination during development and disease1,5-8. How CTCF establishes TAD boundaries and to what extent these are permeable to cohesin is unknown9. To address these questions, we visualize interactions of single CTCF and cohesin molecules on DNA in vitro. We show that CTCF is sufficient to block diffusing cohesin, possibly reflecting how cohesive cohesin accumulates at TAD boundaries, as well as to block loop-extruding cohesin, reflecting how CTCF establishes TAD boundaries. CTCF functions asymmetrically, as predicted, but unexpectedly is dependent on DNA tension. Moreover, CTCF regulates cohesins loop extrusion activity by changing its direction and by inducing loop shrinkage. Our data indicate that CTCF is not, as previously assumed, simply a barrier to cohesin-mediated loop extrusion but is an active regulator of this process, where the permeability of TAD boundaries can be modulated by DNA tension. These results reveal mechanistic principles of how CTCF controls loop extrusion and genome architecture.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2022

Can pseudotopological models for SMC-driven DNA loop extrusion explain the traversal of physical roadblocks bigger than the SMC ring size?

DNA loop extrusion by structural-maintenance-of-chromosome (SMC) complexes has emerged as a primary organizing principle for chromosomes. The mechanism by which SMC motor proteins extrude DNA loops is still unresolved and much debated. The ring-like structure of SMC complexes prompted multiple models where the extruded DNA is topologically or pseudotopologically entrapped within the ring during loop extrusion. However, recent experiments showed the passage of roadblocks much bigger than the SMC ring size, suggesting a nontopological mechanism. Recently, attempts were made to reconcile the observed passage of large roadblocks with a pseudotopological mechanism. Here we examine the predictions of these pseudotopological models, and find that they are not consistent with some experimental data on SMC roadblock encounters. Particularly, these models predict the formation of two loops and that roadblocks will reside near the stem of the loop upon encounter - both in contrast to experimental observations. Overall, the experimental data reinforce the notion of a nontopological mechanism for extrusion of DNA.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2021

SMC complexes can traverse physical roadblocks bigger than their ring size

The ring-shaped structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes (SMC) complexes condensin and cohesin extrude loops of DNA as a key motif in chromosome organization. It remains, how ever, unclear how these SMC motor proteins can extrude DNA loops in chromatin that is bound with proteins. Here, using in vitro single-molecule visualization, we show that nucleosomes, RNA polymerase, and dCas9 pose virtually no barrier to DNA loop extrusion by yeast condensin. Strikingly, we find that even DNA-bound nanoparticles as large as 200 nm, much bigger than the SMC ring size, can be translocated into DNA loops during condensin-driven extrusion. Similarly, human cohesin can pass 200 nm particles during loop extrusion, which even occurs for a single-chain version of cohesin in which the ring-forming subunits are covalently linked and cannot open up to entrap DNA. These findings disqualify all common loop-extrusion models where DNA passes through the SMC rings (pseudo)topologically, and instead point to a nontopological mechanism for DNA loop extrusion. One-sentence summaryHuge DNA-bound roadblocks can be incorporated into SMC-extruded DNA loops, pointing to a nontopological mechanism for loop extrusion.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2020

MCM complexes are barriers that restrict cohesin-mediated loop extrusion

Eukaryotic genomes are compacted into loops and topologically associating domains (TADs), which contribute to transcription, recombination and genomic stability. Cohesin extrudes DNA into loops that are thought to lengthen until CTCF boundaries are encountered. Little is known about whether loop extrusion is impeded by DNA-bound macromolecular machines. We demonstrate that the replicative helicase MCM is a barrier that restricts loop extrusion in G1 phase. Single-nucleus Hi-C of one-cell embryos revealed that MCM loading reduces CTCF-anchored loops and decreases TAD boundary insulation, suggesting loop extrusion is impeded before reaching CTCF. Single-molecule imaging shows that MCMs are physical barriers that frequently constrain cohesin translocation in vitro. Simulations are consistent with MCMs as abundant, random barriers. We conclude that distinct loop extrusion barriers contribute to shaping 3D genomes. One Sentence SummaryMCM complexes are obstacles that impede the formation of CTCF-anchored loops.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

ESCO1 and CTCF enable formation of long chromatin loops by protecting cohesinSTAG1 from WAPL

Eukaryotic genomes are folded into loops. It is thought that these are formed by cohesin complexes via extrusion, either until loop expansion is arrested by CTCF or until cohesin is removed from DNA by WAPL. Although WAPL limits cohesins chromatin residence time to minutes, it has been reported that some loops exist for hours. How these loops can persist is unknown. We show that during G1-phase, mammalian cells contain acetylated cohesinSTAG1 which binds chromatin for hours, whereas cohesinSTAG2 binds chromatin for minutes. Our results indicate that CTCF and the acetyltransferase ESCO1 protect a subset of cohesinSTAG1 complexes from WAPL, thereby enable formation of long and presumably long-lived loops, and that ESCO1, like CTCF, contributes to boundary formation in chromatin looping. Our data are consistent with a model of nested loop extrusion, in which acetylated cohesinSTAG1 forms stable loops between CTCF sites, demarcating the boundaries of more transient cohesinSTAG2 extrusion activity.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2019

A Protein Engineering Approach for Uncovering Cryptic Ubiquitin-binding Sites: from a Ubiquitin-Variant Inhibitor of APC/C to K48 Chain Binding

Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis is a fundamental mechanism used by eukaryotic cells to maintain homeostasis and protein quality, and to control timing in biological processes. Two essential aspects of ubiquitin regulation are conjugation through E1-E2-E3 enzymatic cascades, and recognition by ubiquitin-binding domains. An emerging theme in the ubiquitin field is that these two properties are often amalgamated in conjugation enzymes. In addition to covalent thioester linkage to ubiquitins C-terminus for ubiquitin transfer reactions, conjugation enzymes often bind non-covalently and weakly to ubiquitin at \"exosites\". However, identification of such sites is typically empirical and particularly challenging in large molecular machines. Here, studying the 1.2 MDa E3 ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), which controls cell division and many aspects of neurobiology, we discover a method for identifying unexpected ubiquitin-binding sites. Using a panel of ubiquitin variants (UbVs) we identify a protein-based inhibitor that blocks ubiquitin ligation to APC/C substrates in vitro and ex vivo. Biochemistry, NMR, and cryo EM structurally define the UbV interaction, explain its inhibitory activity through binding the surface on the APC2 subunit that recruits the E2 enzyme UBE2C, and ultimately reveal that this APC2 surface is also a ubiquitin-binding exosite with preference for K48-linked chains. The results provide a new tool for probing APC/C activity, have implications for the coordination of K48-linked Ub chain binding by APC/C with the multistep process of substrate polyubiquitylation, and demonstrate the power of UbV technology for identifying cryptic ubiquitin binding sites within large multiprotein complexes.\n\nSIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTUbiquitin-mediated interactions influence numerous biological processes. These are often transient or a part of multivalent interactions. Therefore, unmasking these interactions remains a significant challenge for large, complicated enzymes such as the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), a multisubunit RING E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase. APC/C activity regulates numerous facets of biology by targeting key regulatory proteins for Ub-mediated degradation. Using a series of Ub variants (UbVs), we identified a new Ub-binding site on the APC/C that preferentially binds to K48-linked Ub chains. More broadly, we demonstrate a workflow that can be exploited to uncover Ub-binding sites within ubiquitylation machinery and other associated regulatory proteins to interrogate the complexity of the Ub code in biology.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2019

Absolute quantification of cohesin, CTCF and their regulators in human cells

The organisation of mammalian genomes into loops and topologically associating domains (TADs) contributes to chromatin structure, gene expression and recombination. Loops and TADs are formed by cohesin and positioned by CTCF. In proliferating cells, cohesin also mediates sister chromatid cohesion, which is essential for chromosome segregation. Current models of chromatin folding and cohesion are based on assumptions of how many cohesin and CTCF molecules organise the genome. Here we have measured absolute copy numbers and dynamics of cohesin, CTCF, NIPBL, WAPL and sororin by mass spectrometry, fluorescence-correlation spectroscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in HeLa cells. In G1-phase there are ~245,000 cohesin complexes, of which ~139,000 are on chromatin. Comparison with chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing data implies that some genomic cohesin and CTCF enrichment sites are unoccupied in single cells at any one time. We discuss the implications of these findings for how cohesin can contribute to genome organisation and cohesion.

cell biology↗