bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

David, A. S.

Publications and source records attributed to David, A. S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The microbial landscape: soil microbiome properties predict plant species distributions

Plant species distributions are shaped by interactions with the abiotic and biotic environment. Despite the known importance of soil microbiomes in shaping plant diversity and function, no study has explicitly determined the ability of the soil microbiome to predict plant species distributions at large scales. We employed paired above- and belowground surveys of plant occurrence and soil microbial taxa and functions across habitat patches (n = 676), applying machine-learning-based distribution modeling to identify the relative influence of the soil microbiome and environmental attributes in predicting plant species (n = 50) distributions across the landscape. We discovered that while abiotic gradients of known importance in this ecosystem were the strongest predictors of many plant species distributions, microbial predictors could have similar or greater influence. Microbiome predictors were collectively more important than abiotic environmental variables for 38% of plant species in this study and explained >70% of the predicted distribution for one species. We identified four microbiome attributes of landscape-scale importance for predicting plant species distributions including prokaryotic richness, fungal richness, the abundance of fungal pathogens, and the abundance of prokaryotic phosphate transport genes in soil. Our findings reveal a previously underappreciated role of the soil microbiome in shaping plant species distributions at a landscape scale, with implications for plant community structure in the context of both ecosystem restoration and future global change.

ecology↗

Climate variability disrupts mutualism-driven increases in population persistence

Understanding how species interactions impact population dynamics and long-term persistence over broad temporal and spatial scales is crucial for predicting species distributions and responses to global change. Here, we integrate range-wide field surveys of [~]90 grass host populations spanning 13 years with demographic modeling based on six-year common garden experiments conducted across the host range to demonstrate that mutualistic fungal endophytes promote population-level persistence and growth of their native host grass across its distribution, with non-mutualistic populations four times more likely to go locally extinct. Despite providing population-level benefits, endophyte prevalence declined eight-fold more in historically mutualistic populations that experienced high climate variability. Thus, mutualisms can underpin population persistence and buffer hosts against environmental stress, but may themselves be vulnerable to global change, with concerning implications for long-term population viability and, ultimately, species distributions under an increasingly uncertain climate.

ecology↗

Drivers of individual plant species contributions to β-diversity are scale-dependent

Species introductions and native extirpations are driving biotic homogenisation in plant communities by reducing {beta}-diversity. Individual species vary in their contributions to {beta}-diversity (Species Contribution to {beta}-Diversity; species-{beta}), yet our understanding of how species characteristics shape these contributions remains limited. Additionally, although the ecological processes influencing {beta}-diversity are known to vary with spatial scale, we lack understanding of how species contributions, or their underlying determinants, change across scales. Here, we modelled how plant functional traits, phylogenetic relatedness, and introduction status influence their contributions to {beta}-diversity using plant community data from 429 plots surveyed from 2017-2023 across three nested spatial scales (up to 1 km2) in nine sites spanning four countries. We extended the analysis to broader spatial extents (100 km2 to the entire UK) using GBIF occurrence data. We found that functional traits associated with competitive ability influenced species-{beta}, but the direction and strength of their effects varied with scale. Likewise, phylogenetic novelty increased species-{beta} at small scales but reduced it at larger ones. After accounting for traits and phylogeny, introduced species consistently contributed less to {beta}-diversity than native species--especially at broader spatial extents. These results demonstrate that species ecological and evolutionary characteristics shape their contributions to {beta}-diversity, but that these effects are scale-dependent. Our findings highlight the importance of scale-explicit approaches in understanding both the determinants of {beta}-diversity, and how we can combat its loss to mitigate biotic homogenisation.

ecology↗