Assessing the Clinical Utility of Finite Element Analysis Using Post-operative CT-Derived Models: A Material Comparison of Multi-level Spinal Fusion Constructs
Successful instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine is a complex surgical challenge, with positive patient outcomes dependent on careful surgical planning. Material selection is of critical importance to a mechanical construct supporting successful spinal fusion. Therefore, the aims of this study were to (a) evaluate the potential clinical use of finite element analysis (FEA) and (b) conduct a retrospective mechanical analysis of different implant materials in patients having undergone spinal fusion using FEA. Our methodology involved segmenting the spine from post-operative computed tomography (CT) image data from patients with previous spinal fusion. FEA models representing post-surgery cases were developed and different biomechanical loading conditions such as compression, flexion, bending and extension whilst testing pedicle screws of different materials were simulated. Patient specific finite element models were created, and biomechanical analysis were completed for all three patients. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) constructs typically demonstrated lower peak implant stress when compared to titanium constructs for all spinal fusion levels. Furthermore, increasing the spinal fusion level resulted in significant differences in the maximum von Mises stress within both the bone and the instrumentation, whereas the 2-level fusion exhibited comparable stress levels in the bone irrespective of the instrumentation material. This pilot explores the potential of FEA as a clinical tool for assessing device and bone stresses. In our cohort, different materials can influence the stresses in both the instrumentation and the instrumented vertebrae, suggesting FEA can be useful pre- operative tool with regards to instrument selection and post-operatively to assess instrumentation and bone stresses. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=74 SRC="FIGDIR/small/742715v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1399da7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19d73e2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2337c8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@232c90_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG