bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Darras, K. F. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Darras, K. F. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Eyes on nature: Embedded vision cameras for multidisciplinary biodiversity monitoring

Global environmental challenges require comprehensive data to manage and protect biodiversity. Currently, vision-based biodiversity monitoring efforts are mixed, incomplete, human-dependent, and passive. To tackle these issues, we present a portable, modular, low-power device with embedded vision for biodiversity monitoring. Our camera uses interchangeable lenses to resolve barely visible and remote subjects, as well as customisable algorithms for blob detection, region-of-interest classification, and object detection to identify targets. We showcase our system in six case studies from the ethology, landscape ecology, agronomy, pollination ecology, conservation biology, and phenology disciplines. Using the same devices, we discovered bats feeding on durian tree flowers, monitored flying bats and their insect prey, identified nocturnal insect pests in paddy fields, detected bees visiting rapeseed crop flowers, triggered real-time alerts for waterbirds, and tracked flower phenology over months. We measured classification accuracies between 55% and 96% in our field surveys and used them to standardise observations over highly-resolved time scales. The cameras are amenable to situations where automated vision-based monitoring is required off the grid, in natural and agricultural ecosystems, and in particular for quantifying species interactions. Embedded vision devices such as this will help addressing global biodiversity challenges and facilitate a technology-aided global food systems transformation.

ecology↗

Autonomous Bird Sound Recording Outperforms Direct Human Observation: Synthesis And New Evidence

1) Autonomous sound recording techniques have gained considerable traction in the last decade, but the question still remains whether they can replace human observation surveys to sample some animal taxa. Especially bird survey methods have been tested using classical point counts and autonomous sound recording techniques.\n2) We review the latest information by comparing both survey methods' standardization, verifiability, sampling completeness, data types, compatibility, and practicality by means of a systematic review and a meta-analysis of alpha and gamma species richness levels sampled by both methods across 20 separate studies.\n3) Although sound recording surveys have hitherto not enjoyed the most effective setups, they yield very similar results in terms of alpha and gamma species richness. We also reveal the crucial importance of the microphone (high signal-to-noise ratio) as the sensor that replaces human senses.\n4) We discuss key differences between both methods, while richness estimates are closely related and 81% of all species were detected by both methods. Sound recording techniques provide a more powerful and promising tool to monitor birds in a standardized, verifiable, and exhaustive way against the golden standard of point counts. Advantages include the capability of sampling continuously through day or season and of difficult-to-reach regions in an autonomous way, avoidance of observer bias and human disturbance effects and higher detection probability of rare species due to extensive recordings.

ecology↗