Biology subjects

Dannlowski, U.

Publications and source records attributed to Dannlowski, U..

34 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Multi-Site Statistical Mapping of Along-Tract Microstructural Abnormalities in Bipolar Disorder with Diffusion MRI Tractometry

Investigating alterations in brain circuitry associated with bipolar disorder (BD) may offer a valuable approach to discover brain biomarkers for genetic and interventional studies of the disorder and related mental illnesses. Some diffusion MRI studies report evidence of microstructural abnormalities in white matter regions of interest, but we lack a fine-scale spatial mapping of brain microstructural differences along tracts in BD. We also lack large-scale studies that integrate tractometry data from multiple sites, as larger datasets can greatly enhance power to detect subtle effects and assess whether effects replicate across larger international datasets. In this multisite diffusion MRI study, we used BUndle ANalytics (BUAN, Chandio 2020), a recently developed analytic approach for tractography, to extract, map, and visualize profiles of microstructural abnormalities on 3D models of fiber tracts in 148 participants with BD and 259 healthy controls from 6 independent scan sites. Modeling site differences as random effects, we investigated along-tract white matter (WM) microstructural differences between diagnostic groups. QQ plots showed that group differences were gradually enhanced as more sites were added. Using the BUAN pipeline, BD was associated with lower mean fractional anisotropy (FA) in fronto-limbic, interhemispheric, and posterior pathways; higher FA was also noted in posterior bundles, relative to controls. By integrating tractography and anatomical information, BUAN effectively captures unique effects along white matter (WM) tracts, providing valuable insights into anatomical variations that may assist in the classification of diseases.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Cross-validation for the estimation of effect size generalizability in mass-univariate brain-wide association studies

IntroductionStatistical effect sizes are systematically overestimated in small samples, leading to poor generalizability and replicability of findings in all areas of research. Due to the large number of variables, this is particularly problematic in neuroimaging research. While cross-validation is frequently used in multivariate machine learning approaches to assess model generalizability and replicability, the benefits for mass-univariate brain analysis are yet unclear. We investigated the impact of cross-validation on effect size estimation in univariate voxel-based brain-wide associations, using body mass index (BMI) as an exemplary predictor. MethodsA total of n=3401 adults were pooled from three independent cohorts. Brain-wide associations between BMI and gray matter structure were tested using a standard linear mass-univariate voxel-based approach. First, a traditional non-cross-validated analysis was conducted to identify brain-wide effect sizes in the total sample (as an estimate of a realistic reference effect size). The impact of sample size (bootstrapped samples ranging from n=25 to n=3401) and cross-validation on effect size estimates was investigated across selected voxels with differing underlying effect sizes (including the brain-wide lowest effect size). Linear effects were estimated within training sets and then applied to unseen test set data, using 5-fold cross-validation. Resulting effect sizes (explained variance) were investigated. ResultsAnalysis in the total sample (n=3401) without cross-validation yielded mainly negative correlations between BMI and gray matter density with a maximum effect size of R2p=.036 (peak voxel in the cerebellum). Effects were overestimated exponentially with decreasing sample size, with effect sizes up to R2p=.535 in samples of n=25 for the voxel with the brain-wide largest effect and up to R2p=.429 for the voxel with the brain-wide smallest effect. When applying cross-validation, linear effects estimated in small samples did not generalize to an independent test set. For the largest brain-wide effect a minimum sample size of n=100 was required to start generalizing (explained variance >0 in unseen data), while n=400 were needed for smaller effects of R2p =.005 to generalize. For a voxel with an underlying null effect, linear effects found in non-cross-validated samples did not generalize to test sets even with the maximum sample size of n=3401. Effect size estimates obtained with and without cross-validation approached convergence in large samples. DiscussionCross-validation is a useful method to counteract the overestimation of effect size particularly in small samples and to assess the generalizability of effects. Train and test set effect sizes converge in large samples which likely reflects a good generalizability for models in such samples. While linear effects start generalizing to unseen data in samples of n>100 for large effect sizes, the generalization of smaller effects requires larger samples (n>400). Cross-validation should be applied in voxel-based mass-univariate analysis to foster accurate effect size estimation and improve replicability of neuroimaging findings. We provide open-source python code for this purpose (https://osf.io/cy7fp/?view_only=a10fd0ee7b914f50820b5265f65f0cdb).

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Connectome architecture shapes large-scale cortical reorganization in schizophrenia: a worldwide ENIGMA study

While schizophrenia is considered a prototypical network disorder characterized by widespread brain-morphological alterations, it still remains unclear whether distributed structural alterations robustly reflect underlying network layout. Here, we tested whether large-scale structural alterations in schizophrenia relate to normative structural and functional connectome architecture, and systematically evaluated robustness and generalizability of these network-level alterations. Leveraging anatomical MRI scans from 2,439 adults with schizophrenia and 2,867 healthy controls from 26 ENIGMA sites and normative data from the Human Connectome Project (n=207), we evaluated structural alterations of schizophrenia against two network susceptibility models: i) hub vulnerability, which examines associations between regional network centrality and magnitude of disease-related alterations; ii) epicenter mapping, which identify regions whose typical connectivity profile most closely resembles the disease-related morphological alterations. To assess generalizability and specificity, we contextualized the influence of site, disease stages, and individual clinical factors and compared network associations of schizophrenia with that found in affective disorders. Schizophrenia-related structural alterations co-localized with interconnected functional and structural hubs and harbored temporo-paralimbic and frontal epicenters. Findings were robust across sites and related to individual symptom profiles. We observed localized unique epicenters for first-episode psychosis and early stages, and transmodal epicenters that were shared across first-episode to chronic stages. Moreover, transdiagnostic comparisons revealed overlapping epicenters in schizophrenia and bipolar, but not major depressive disorder, yielding insights in pathophysiological continuity within the schizophrenia-bipolar-spectrum. In sum, cortical alterations over the course of schizophrenia robustly follow brain network architecture, emphasizing marked hub susceptibility and temporo-frontal epicenters at both the level of the group and the individual. Subtle variations of epicenters across disease stages suggest interacting pathological processes, while associations with patient-specific symptoms support additional inter-individual variability of hub vulnerability and epicenters in schizophrenia. Our work contributes to recognizing potentially common pathways to better understand macroscale structural alterations, and inter-individual variability in schizophrenia.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Bridging Big Data: Procedures for Combining Non-equivalent Cognitive Measures from the ENIGMA Consortium

Investigators in neuroscience have turned to Big Data to address replication and reliability issues by increasing sample sizes, statistical power, and representativeness of data. These efforts unveil new questions about integrating data arising from distinct sources and instruments. We focus on the most frequently assessed cognitive domain - memory testing - and demonstrate a process for reliable data harmonization across three common measures. We aggregated global raw data from 53 studies totaling N = 10,505 individuals. A mega-analysis was conducted using empirical bayes harmonization to remove site effects, followed by linear models adjusting for common covariates. A continuous item response theory (IRT) model estimated each individuals latent verbal learning ability while accounting for item difficulties. Harmonization significantly reduced inter-site variance while preserving covariate effects, and our conversion tool is freely available online. This demonstrates that large-scale data sharing and harmonization initiatives can address reproducibility and integration challenges across the behavioral sciences. TeaserWe present a global effort to devise harmonization procedures necessary to meaningfully leverage big data.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Interrelated effects of age and parenthood on whole-brain controllability: protective effects of parenthood in mothers

BackgroundControllability is a measure of the brains ability to orchestrate neural activity which can be quantified in terms of properties of the brains network connectivity. Evidence from the literature suggests that aging can exert a general effect on whole-brain controllability. Mounting evidence, on the other hand, suggests that parenthood and motherhood in particular lead to long-lasting changes in brain architecture that effectively slow down brain aging. We hypothesize that parenthood might preserve brain controllability properties from aging. MethodsIn a sample of 814 healthy individuals (aged 33.9{+/-}12.7 years, 522 females), we estimate whole-brain controllability and compare the aging effects in subjects with vs. those without children. We use diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to estimate the brain structural connectome. The level of brain control is then calculated from the connectomic properties of the brain structure. Specifically, we measure the network control over many low-energy state transitions (average controllability) and the network control over difficult-to-reach states (modal controllability). Results and conclusionIn nulliparous females, whole-brain average controllability increases, and modal controllability decreases with age, a trend that we do not observe in parous females. Statistical comparison of the controllability metrics shows that modal controllability is higher and average controllability is lower in parous females compared to nulliparous females. In men, we observed the same trend, but the difference between nulliparous and parous males do not reach statistical significance. Our results provide strong evidence that parenthood contradicts aging effects on brain controllability and the effect is stronger in mothers.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Reproducibility of neuroimaging studies of brain disorders with hundreds -not thousands- of participants

An important current question in neuroimaging concerns the sample sizes required for producing reliable and reproducible results. Recent findings suggest that brain-wide association studies (BWAS) linking neuroimaging features with behavioural phenotypes in the general population are characterised by (very) weak effects and consequently need large samples sizes of 3000+ to lead to reproducible findings. A second, important goal in neuroimaging is to study brain structure and function under disease conditions, where effects are likely much larger. This difference in effect size is important. We show by means of power calculations and empirical analysis that neuroimaging studies in clinical populations need hundreds -and not necessarily thousands-of participants to lead to reproducible findings.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Bipolar-associated miR-499-5p controls neuroplasticity by downregulating the Cav1.2 L-type voltage gated calcium channel subunit CACNB2

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic mood disorder characterized by alternating manic and depressive episodes, often in conjunction with cognitive deficits. Dysregulation of neuroplasticity and calcium homeostasis as a result of complex genetic environment interactions are frequently observed in BD patients, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we show that a BD-associated microRNA, miR-499-5p, regulates neuronal dendrite development and cognitive function by downregulating the BD risk gene CACNB2. miR-499-5p expression is increased in peripheral blood of BD patients and healthy subjects at risk of developing the disorder due to a history of childhood maltreatment. This up-regulation is paralleled in the hippocampus of rats which underwent juvenile social isolation. Elevating miR-499-5p levels in rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons impairs dendritogenesis and reduces surface expression and activity of the voltage-gated L-type calcium channel Cav1.2. We further identified CACNB2, which encodes a regulatory {beta}-subunit of Cav1.2, as a direct target of miR-499-5p in neurons. CACNB2 downregulation is required for the miR-499-5p dependent impairment of dendritogenesis, suggesting that CACNB2 is an important downstream target of miR-499-5p in the regulation of neuroplasticity. Finally, elevating miR-499-5p in the hippocampus in vivo is sufficient to induce short-term memory impairments in rats haploinsufficient for the Cav1.2 pore forming subunit Cacna1c. Taken together, we propose that stress-induced upregulation of miR-499-5p contributes to dendritic impairments and deregulated calcium homeostasis in BD, with specific implications for the neurocognitive dysfunction frequently observed in BD patients.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Genetic comorbidity between major depression and cardio-metabolic disease, stratified by age at onset of major depression.

IntroductionIts imperative to understand the specific and shared aetiologies of major depression and cardio-metabolic disease, as both traits are frequently comorbid and each represents a major burden to society. This study examined whether there is a genetic association between major depression and cardio-metabolic traits and if this association is stratified by age at onset for major depression.\n\nMethodsPolygenic risk scores analysis and linkage disequilibrium score regression was performed to examine whether differences in shared genetic aetiology exist between depression case control status (N cases = 40,940, N controls = 67,532), earlier (N = 15,844), and later onset depression (N = 15,800) with body mass index, coronary artery disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes in eleven data sets from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Generation Scotland, and UK Biobank.\n\nResultsAll cardio-metabolic polygenic risk scores were associated with depression status. Significant genetic correlations were found between depression and body mass index, coronary artery disease, and type 2 diabetes. Higher polygenic risk for body mass index, coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes was associated with both early and later onset depression, while higher polygenic risk for stroke was associated with later onset depression only. Significant genetic correlations were found between body mass index and later onset depression, and between coronary artery disease and both early and late onset depression.\n\nConclusionsThe phenotypic associations between major depression and cardio-metabolic traits may partly reflect their overlapping genetic aetiology irrespective of the age depression first presents.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2019

Brain Aging in Major Depressive Disorder: Results from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with an increased risk of brain atrophy, aging-related diseases, and mortality. We examined potential advanced brain aging in MDD patients, and whether this process is associated with clinical characteristics in a large multi-center international dataset. MethodsWe performed a mega-analysis by pooling brain measures derived from T1-weighted MRI scans from 29 samples worldwide. Normative brain aging was estimated by predicting chronological age (10-75 years) from 7 subcortical volumes, 34 cortical thickness and 34 surface area, lateral ventricles and total intracranial volume measures separately in 1,147 male and 1,386 female controls from the ENIGMA MDD working group. The learned model parameters were applied to 1,089 male controls and 1,167 depressed males, and 1,326 female controls and 2,044 depressed females to obtain independent unbiased brain-based age predictions. The difference between predicted "brain age" and chronological age was calculated to indicate brain predicted age difference (brain-PAD). FindingsOn average, MDD patients showed a higher brain-PAD of +0.90 (SE 0.21) years (Cohens d=0.12, 95% CI 0.06-0.17) compared to controls. Relative to controls, first-episode and currently depressed patients showed higher brain-PAD (+1.2 [0.3] years), and the largest effect was observed in those with late-onset depression (+1.7 [0.7] years). In addition, higher brain-PAD was associated with higher self-reported depressive symptomatology (b=0.05, p=0.004). InterpretationThis highly powered collaborative effort showed subtle patterns of abnormal structural brain aging in MDD. Substantial within-group variance and overlap between groups were observed. Longitudinal studies of MDD and somatic health outcomes are needed to further assess the predictive value of these brain-PAD estimates. FundingThis work was supported, in part, by NIH grants U54 EB020403 and R01 MH116147.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Subcortical Shape Alterations in Major Depressive Disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group

Alterations in regional subcortical brain volumes have been widely investigated as part of the efforts of an international consortium, ENIGMA, to determine reliable structural brain signatures for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Given that subcortical structures are comprised of distinct subfields, we sought to build significantly from prior work to precisely map localized MDD-related differences in subcortical regions using shape analysis. In this meta-analysis of subcortical shape from the ENIGMA-MDD working group, we compared 1,781 patients with MDD and 2,953 healthy controls (CTL) on individual measures of shape metrics (thickness and surface area) on the surface of seven bilateral subcortical structures: nucleus accumbens, amygdala, caudate, hippocampus, pallidum, putamen, and thalamus. Harmonized data processing and statistical analyses were conducted locally at each site, and findings were aggregated by meta-analysis. Relative to CTL, patients with MDD had lower surface area in the subiculum of the hippocampus, the basolateral amygdala, and the nucleus accumbens shell. Relative to CTL, patients with adolescent-onset MDD ([≤] 21 years) had lower thickness and surface area of the subiculum of the hippocampus and the basolateral amygdala. Relative to first-episode MDD, recurrent MDD patients had lower thickness and surface area in the CA1 of the hippocampus and the basolateral amygdala. Our results suggest that previously reported MDD-associated volumetric differences may be localized to specific subfields of these structures that have been shown to be sensitive to the effects of stress, with important implications for mapping treatments to patients based on specific neural targets and key clinical features.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

10Kin1day: A bottom-up neuroimaging initiative

We organized 10Kin1day, a pop-up scientific event with the goal to bring together neuroimaging groups from around the world to jointly analyze 10,000+ existing MRI connectivity datasets during a 3-day workshop. In this report, we describe the motivation and principles of 10Kin1day, together with a public release of 8,000+ MRI connectome maps of the human brain.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Variation of HbA1c affects cognition and white matter microstructure in healthy, young adults

The metabolic serum marker HbA1c has been associated with both impaired cognitive performance and altered white matter integrity in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus. However, it remains unclear if higher levels of HbA1c might also affect brain structure and function in healthy subjects. With the present study we therefore aimed to investigate the relationship between HbA1c levels and cognitive performance as well as white matter microstructure in healthy, young adults.\n\nTo address this question, associations between HbA1c and cognitive measures (NIH Cognition Toolbox) as well as DTI-derived imaging measures of white matter microstructure were investigated in a publicly available sample of healthy, young adults as part of the Humane Connectome Project (n= 1206, mean age= 28.8 years, 45.5 % male).\n\nWe found that HbA1c levels (range 4.1-6.3%) were significantly inversely correlated with measures of cognitive performance. Higher HbA1c levels were associated with significant and widespread reductions in fractional anisotropy (FA) controlling for age, sex, body-mass index and education. FA reductions were furthermore found to covary with measures of cognitive performance. The same pattern of results could be observed in analyses restricted to participants with HBAlc levels below 5.7%.\n\nThe present study demonstrates that low-grade HbA1c variation below diagnostic threshold for diabetes is related to both cognitive performance and white matter integrity in healthy, young adults. These findings highlight the detrimental impact of metabolic risk factors on brain physiology and underscore the importance of intensified preventive measures independent of the currently applied diagnostic HbA1c cut-off scores.\n\nHighlightsO_LIHbAlc levels are negatively associated with cognitive performance in healthy, young adults in a sample of n=1206 (Human Connectome Project).\nC_LIO_LIHbA1c levels even below strict prediabetes thresholds are negatively associated with white matter integrity throughout the brain.\nC_LIO_LIWhite matter integrity in affected regions is positively associated with cognitive performance.\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Genetic variation in the Major Histocompatibility Complex and association with depression

BackgroundThe prevalence of depression is higher in individuals suffering from autoimmune diseases, but the mechanisms underlying the observed comorbidities are unknown. Epidemiological findings point to a bi-directional relationship - that depression increases the risk of developing an autoimmune disease, and vice-versa. Shared genetic etiology is a plausible explanation for the overlap between depression and autoimmune diseases. In this study we tested whether genetic variation in the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC), which is associated with risk for autoimmune diseases, is also associated with risk for depression.\n\nMethodWe fine-mapped the classical MHC (chr6: 29.6-33.1 Mb), imputing 216 Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) alleles and four Complement Component 4 (C4) haplotypes in studies from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) working group and the UK Biobank (UKB). In the 26 PGC-MDD studies, cases met a lifetime diagnosis of MDD, determined by a structured diagnostic interview. In the UKB, cases and controls were identified from an online mental health questionnaire. The total sample size was 45,149 depression cases and 86,698 controls. We tested for association between depression status and imputed MHC variants in each study and performed an inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis across the PGC-MDD and UKB samples, applying both a conservative region-wide significance threshold (3.9-e6) and a candidate threshold (1.6e-4).\n\nResultsNo HLA alleles or C4 haplotypes were associated with depression at the conservative threshold in the PGC, UKB or meta-analysis. HLA-B*08:01 was associated with modest protection for depression at the candidate threshold in the meta-analysis. Under the conservative threshold, 70 SNPs were detected in the UKB and 143 SNPs were detected in the meta-analysis, mirroring previous findings from highly powered GWAS of depression.\n\nDiscussionWe found no evidence that HLA alleles, which play a major role in the genetic susceptibility to autoimmune diseases, or C4 haplotypes, which are strongly associated with schizophrenia, confer risk for depression. These results indicate that autoimmune diseases and depression do not share common risk loci of moderate or large effect in the MHC.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Deep Learning for Quality Control of Subcortical Brain 3D Shape Models

We present several deep learning models for assessing the morphometric fidelity of deep grey matter region models extracted from brain MRI. We test three different convolutional neural net architectures (VGGNet, ResNet and Inception) over 2D maps of geometric features. Further, we present a novel geometry feature augmentation technique based on parametric spherical mapping. Finally, we present an approach for model decision visualization, allowing human raters to see the areas of subcortical shapes most likely to be deemed of failing quality by the machine. Our training data is comprised of 5200 subjects from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia MRI cohorts, and our test dataset contains 1500 subjects from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder cohorts. Our final models reduce human rater time by 46-70%. ResNet outperforms VGGNet and Inception for all of our predictive tasks.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Shared vulnerability for connectome alterations across psychiatric and neurological brain disorders

Macroscale white matter pathways form the infrastructure for large-scale communication in the human brain, a prerequisite for healthy brain function. Conversely, disruptions in the brains connectivity architecture are thought to play an important role in a wide range of psychiatric and neurological brain disorders. Here we show that especially connections important for global communication and network integration are involved in a wide range of brain disorders. We report on a meta-analytic connectome study comprising in total 895 patients and 1,016 controls across twelve neurological and psychiatric disorders. We extracted disorder connectome fingerprints for each of these twelve disorders, which were then combined into a cross-disorder disconnectivity involvement map, representing the involvement of each brain pathway across brain disorders. Our findings show connections central to the brains infrastructure are disproportionally involved across a wide range of disorders. Connections critical for global network communication and integration display high disturbance across disorders, suggesting a general cross-disorder involvement and importance of these pathways in normal function. Taken together, our cross-disorder study suggests a convergence of disconnectivity across disorders to a partially shared disconnectivity substrate of central connections.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Machine Learning for Large-Scale Quality Control of 3D Shape Models in Neuroimaging

As very large studies of complex neuroimaging phenotypes become more common, human quality assessment of MRI-derived data remains one of the last major bottlenecks. Few attempts have so far been made to address this issue with machine learning. In this work, we optimize predictive models of quality for meshes representing deep brain structure shapes. We use standard vertex-wise and global shape features computed homologously across 19 cohorts and over 7500 human-rated subjects, training kernelized Support Vector Machine and Gradient Boosted Decision Trees classifiers to detect meshes of failing quality. Our models generalize across datasets and diseases, reducing human workload by 30-70%, or equivalently hundreds of human rater hours for datasets of comparable size, with recall rates approaching inter-rater reliability.

neuroscience↗