Damschen, E. I. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2026

Experimental landscape connectivity decreases temporal variability in communities over 24 years of assembly

Landscape connectivity is a key regulator of dispersal, which is an important process in community assembly. Theory predicts that connectivity may influence spatial and temporal patterns of community assembly; however, empirically evaluating the role of connectivity is nearly impossible due to the need to isolate its influence over long time frames and large spatial extents. We overcome these challenges through a large-scale, long-term connectivity experiment to test how connectivity affects plant community turnover and directionality of change over 24 years of assembly. Plant communities within connected patches had lower temporal variability in composition compared to plant communities within unconnected patches. Differences in composition between patches and the directionality of compositional changes were driven more by the amount of edge habitat in a patch and the time since the start of assembly. All community responses to connectivity were stronger for species with wind or unassisted dispersal compared to those with seeds dispersed by animals. Connectivitys role in regulating local community dynamics is critical for understanding community assembly and increasingly relevant in an era of anthropogenic land-use change. Significance StatementConnectivity between habitat patches facilitates dispersal to localities, yet the impact of connectivity on local species assemblages is exceptionally challenging to isolate from other spatial changes over time. In a 24-year experiment, we found that connectivity stabilized local community composition as a higher number of species persisted across years within patches connected by corridors. Independent of connectivity, edge effects were more important for driving compositional differences between patches. Importantly, these patterns would not have been captured with short-term data or without controlling for confounding spatial changes. Our findings have broad conservation relevance. Anthropogenic landscape changes that result in a loss of connectivity or increased edge effects may disrupt local community assembly over time.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2026

Bumble Bee Abundance and Diversity Increase with Intensity of Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Intervention

IntroductionHuman land-use intensification and the resulting habitat loss are primary drivers of insect pollinator declines. Habitat restoration offers a promising approach to counteract these declines, yet landscape-level evaluations of bee responses to restoration and management remain limited. We conducted a two-year, landscape-scale study in Wisconsin, USA, to assess how different intensities of tallgrass prairie restoration and management affect bumble bees (Bombus spp.). ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine whether (1) bumble bee abundance and diversity increase with assisted restoration, and (2) outcomes differ between low-(seeded only) and moderate-intensity (seeded and managed with prescribed fire) interventions. MethodsUsing catch-and-release surveys, we measured bumble bee abundance and diversity at 32 sites representing a gradient in restoration intervention: no intervention (unassisted recovery), low intervention, and moderate intervention. ResultsBumble bee abundance and diversity were higher at assisted restoration sites (low and moderate intervention) than at unassisted sites. Although both tended to be greater at moderate than low intervention intensities, these differences were not statistically significant. Bumble bee community composition also differed across intervention intensity, driven by shifts in dominant species (e.g., B. impatiens and B. griseocollis). Rarer taxa, including endangered and vulnerable species, occurred only at assisted restoration sites, with the largest populations at moderate intervention sites. Across all sites, bumble bee responses were strongly and positively associated with floral abundance, but not with semi-natural habitat in the surrounding landscape. ConclusionOur findings demonstrate that assisted grassland restoration can effectively increase bumble bee abundance and diversity, supporting its value as a conservation practice for pollinators. Implications for Practice: (1) Grassland restorations targeting plant communities can successfully support nontarget pollinators across a range of management intensities and landscape contexts. Adding seeds of pollinator-preferred plants could improve restorations with low floral abundance and diversity. (2) Management of existing restorations is important to maintain abundant floral resources and diverse pollinator communities. Because sites varied widely in prescribed fire use, our findings likely represent a conservative estimate of its benefits, and higher intervention intensity (e.g., repeated seeding, regular fire, mechanical or chemical shrub and invasive plants control) may further enhance outcomes for bumble bees.

ecology↗