Biology subjects

Dadashkarimi, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Dadashkarimi, J..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Brain age prediction from structural and functional connectivity across the lifespan using connectome-based predictive modeling

Brain maturation and aging are characterized by widespread changes in structural and functional brain organization. The extent to which these modalities capture shared versus distinct signatures of lifespan development and aging remains unclear. In this study, we applied connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) to connectomes derived from diffusion MRI and resting-state functional MRI in Human Connectome Project Development, Young Adult, Aging, and combined Lifespan cohorts to predict chronological age. Both structural and functional connectomes significantly predicted age across cohorts, demonstrating that age-related information is distributed throughout whole-brain connectivity patterns. Prediction performance varied across lifespan stages, with generally stronger performance in the Development, Aging, and Lifespan cohorts than in Young Adulthood. Structural and functional models produced significantly correlated predicted ages in several cohorts, indicating shared age-related information across modalities. Structural-functional convergence analyses revealed limited and variable correspondence between modality-specific predictive features, suggesting that structural and functional connectomes capture both shared and complementary aspects of brain maturation and aging. Network-level analyses demonstrated that age-predictive information was distributed across canonical brain networks, including cerebellar, frontoparietal, salience, somatomotor, and subcortical networks, with patterns varying across cohorts and modalities. Multimodal CPM improved prediction relative to unimodal models in several cohorts, supporting the complementary contribution of structural and functional connectivity to age prediction. Cross-cohort, cross-sex, and cross-modality analyses further characterized the generalizability and shared information of predictive models across lifespan stages, sexes, and imaging modalities. This work demonstrates the utility of CPM for characterizing distributed structural and functional connectivity patterns associated with chronological age across the lifespan and provides a foundation for future studies of individual variability in brain maturation and aging.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

PIGMENT: A deep learning framework for Porcine Immunohistochemistry seGMENTation

Traumatic brain injury produces widespread axonal damage can be assessed histologically using amyloid precursor protein (APP) immunohistochemistry, which labels injured axonal profiles at cellular resolution [1, 2]. However, quantification of APP pathology remains a major bottleneck: annotation is manual, time-consuming, spatially localized, and variable across raters, limiting scalability and reproducibility. This limitation is particularly important in studies that use histology as a reference for neuroimaging or other tissue-level measurements, where cellular APP pathology must be quantified in a spatial form that can be aligned with imaging abnormalities. Here, we introduce PIGMENT, an annotation-efficient deep-learning framework for automated segmentation and quantification of APP-positive pathology in porcine white matter histology. PIGMENT uses a compact SegFormer-B0 architecture trained on 525 expert-annotated 512 x 512-pixel tiles from four APP-stained sections across three pigs. Because APP-positive profiles are sparse, fragmented, stain-variable, and morphologically diverse, PIGMENT combines limited expert labels with APP-specific augmentation designed to model variation in APP-positive intensity, size, continuity, fragmentation, and local tissue context. We evaluated PIGMENT using an instance-level detection rate that measures whether discrete APP-positive components are localized. Across held-out APP-stained data, PIGMENT achieved a mean instance-level detection rate of 0.86. Across the configurations tested, the highest mean detection rate was achieved by a training set that included sections from different animals, suggesting that annotation diversity may be an important factor under limited-label conditions. By extending limited high-confidence expert annotations into whole-section APP burden maps, PIGMENT provides a scalable framework for characterizing the extent and spatial distribution of traumatic axonal injury. These maps may support future studies that align histological injury burden with imaging-derived measures.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

The Hidden Landscape of Missed Effects in Human Functional Neuroimaging

Functional neuroimaging aims to uncover brain processes underlying behavior and disease, yet studies are often underpowered to detect these effects. How this literature has shaped our understanding of brain function remains unknown, and little guidance exists for planning better powered studies. An underappreciated barrier is that commonly reported effect sizes across the brain are inflated, biasing study planning. Here, we introduce a correction for this inflation bias and show how more accurate studies can be planned using corrected effect size benchmarks from a mega-analysis of 63 typical studies across seven large datasets (52,979 participants). We find that common methods of planning studies based on uncorrected effects lead to roughly half the expected detections at typical sample sizes, with limited spatial overlap with original findings. These missed effects collectively explain meaningful additional variance in the desired outcome. We show how to recover missed effects by planning not only for power but also for a target number of detections via corrected benchmarks, or by taking a whole-brain approach with multivariate effects that individual research groups can detect (n < 50 compared to n > 1,000 for a typical univariate effect). These findings lay the groundwork for more informed study planning and a richer understanding of the widespread nature of brain effects, with implications for shared challenges (and solutions) across biomedicine.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Overlooked features lead to divergent neurobiological interpretations of brain-based machine learning biomarkers

A central objective in human neuroimaging is to understand the neurobiology underlying cognition and mental health. Machine learning models trained on brain connectivity data are increasingly used as tools for predicting behavioral phenotypes 1,2, enhancing precision medicine 3,4, and improving generalizability compared to traditional MRI studies 5. However, the high dimensionality of brain connectivity data makes model interpretation challenging 6. Prevailing practices within the field rely on sparsely selected brain connectivity features, implicitly interpreting identified feature networks as uniquely representative of a given phenotype while overlooking others. Here, we show that commonly overlooked brain connectivity features can achieve similar prediction accuracies while yielding markedly different neurobiological interpretations. Using four large-scale neuroimaging datasets spanning over 12,000 participants and 13 outcomes, we demonstrate that this phenomenon is widespread across cognitive, developmental, and psychiatric phenotypes. It extends to both functional connectivity (fMRI) and structural (DTI) connectomes and remains evident even in external validation. These findings suggest that common practices may lead to feature overinterpretation and a misrepresentation of the neurobiological bases of brain-behavior associations. Such interpretations present only the "tip of the iceberg" when certain disregarded features may be just as meaningful, potentially contributing to ongoing issues surrounding reproducibility within the field. More broadly, our results point to the possibility that multiple neurobiologically distinct models may exist for the same phenotype, with implications for identifying meaningful subtypes within clinical and research populations.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Brain-phenotype predictions can survive across diverse real-world data

Recent work suggests that machine learning models predicting psychiatric treatment outcomes based on clinical data may fail when applied to unharmonized samples. Neuroimaging predictive models offer the opportunity to incorporate neurobiological information, which may be more robust to dataset shifts. Yet, among the minority of neuroimaging studies that undertake any form of external validation, there is a notable lack of attention to generalization across dataset-specific idiosyncrasies. Research settings, by design, remove the between-site variations that real-world and, eventually, clinical applications demand. Here, we rigorously test the ability of a range of predictive models to generalize across three diverse, unharmonized samples: the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (n=1291), the Healthy Brain Network (n=1110), and the Human Connectome Project in Development (n=428). These datasets have high inter-dataset heterogeneity, encompassing substantial variations in age distribution, sex, racial and ethnic minority representation, recruitment geography, clinical symptom burdens, fMRI tasks, sequences, and behavioral measures. We demonstrate that reproducible and generalizable brain-behavior associations can be realized across diverse dataset features with sample sizes in the hundreds. Results indicate the potential of functional connectivity-based predictive models to be robust despite substantial inter-dataset variability. Notably, for the HCPD and HBN datasets, the best predictions were not from training and testing in the same dataset (i.e., cross-validation) but across datasets. This result suggests that training on diverse data may improve prediction in specific cases. Overall, this work provides a critical foundation for future work evaluating the generalizability of neuroimaging predictive models in real-world scenarios and clinical settings.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Stacking multiple optimal transport policies to map functional connectomes

Connectomics is a popular approach for understanding the brain with neuroimaging data. However, a connectome generated from one atlas is different in size, topology, and scale compared to a connectome generated from another. Consequently, connectomes generated from different atlases cannot be used in the same analysis. This limitation hinders efforts toward increasing sample size and demonstrating generalizability across datasets. Recently, we proposed Cross Atlas Remapping via Optimal Transport (CAROT) to find a spatial mapping between a pair of atlases based on a set of training data. The mapping transforms timeseries fMRI data parcellated with an atlas to form a connectome based on a different one. Crucially, CAROT does not need raw fMRI data and thus does not require re-processing, which can otherwise be time-consuming and expensive. The current CAROT implementation leverages information from several source atlases to create robust mappings for a target atlas. In this work, we extend CAROT to combine existing mappings between a source and target atlas for an arbitrary number of mappings. This extension (labeled Stacking CAROT) allows mappings between a pair of atlases to be created once and re-used with other pre-trained mappings to create new mappings as needed. Reconstructed connectomes from Stacking CAROT perform as well as those from CAROT in downstream analyses. Importantly, Stacking CAROT significantly reduces training time and storage requirements compared to CAROT. Overall, Stacking CAROT improves previous versions of CAROT.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Trends in self-citation rates in neuroscience literature

Citation metrics influence academic reputation and career trajectories. Recent works have highlighted flaws in citation practices in the Neurosciences, such as the under-citation of women. However, self-citation rates--or how much authors cite themselves--have not yet been comprehensively investigated in the Neurosciences. This work characterizes self-citation rates in basic, translational, and clinical Neuroscience literature by collating 100,347 articles from 63 journals between the years 2000-2020. In analyzing over five million citations, we demonstrate four key findings: 1) increasing self-citation rates of Last Authors relative to First Authors, 2) lower self-citation rates in low- and middle-income countries, 3) gender differences in self-citation stemming from differences in the number of previously published papers, and 4) variations in self-citation rates by field. Our characterization of self-citation provides insight into citation practices that shape the perceived influence of authors in the Neurosciences, which in turn may impact what type of scientific research is done and who gets the opportunity to do it.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Cross Atlas Remapping via Optimal Transport (CAROT): Creating connectomes for any atlas when raw data is not available

Open-source, publicly available neuroimaging datasets--whether from large-scale data collection efforts or pooled from multiple smaller studies--offer unprecedented sample sizes and promote generalization efforts. Releasing data can democratize science, increase the replicability of findings, and lead to discoveries. Due to patient privacy and data storage concerns, researchers typically release preprocessed data with the voxelwise time series parcellated into a map of predefined regions, known as an atlas. However, releasing preprocessed data also limits the choices available to the end-user. This is especially true for connectomics, as connectomes created from different atlases are not directly comparable. Since there exist several atlases with no gold standards, it is unrealistic to have processed, open-source data available from all atlases. Together, these limitations directly inhibit the potential benefits of open-source neuroimaging data. To address these limitations, we introduce Cross Atlas Remapping via Optimal Transport (CAROT) to find a mapping between two atlases. This approach allows data processed from one atlas to be directly transformed into a connectome based on another atlas without the need for raw data access. To validate CAROT, we compare reconstructed connectomes against their original counterparts (i.e., connectomes generated directly from an atlas), demonstrate the utility of transformed connectomes in downstream analyses, and show how a connectome-based predictive model can generalize to publicly available data that was processed with different atlases. Overall, CAROT can reconstruct connectomes from an extensive set of atlases--without ever needing the raw data--allowing already processed connectomes to be easily reused in a wide range of analyses while eliminating redundant processing efforts. We share this tool as both source code and as a stand-alone web application (http://carotproject.com/).

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Task-Based Functional Connectomes Predict Cognitive Phenotypes Across Psychiatric Disease

ImportanceWe show that three common approaches to clinical deficits (cognitive phenotype, disease group, disease severity) each offer useful and perhaps complimentary explanations for the brains underlying functional architecture as affected by psychiatric disease.\n\nObjectiveTo understand how different clinical frameworks are represented in the brains functional connectome.\n\nDesignWe use an openly available dataset to create predictive models based on multiple connectomes built from task-based functional MRI data. We use these models to predict individual traits corresponding to multiple cognitive constructs across disease category. We also show that these same connectomes statistically differ depending on disease category and symptom burden.\n\nSettingThis was a population-based study with data collected in UCLA.\n\nParticipantsHealthy adults were recruited by community advertisements from the Los Angeles area. Participants with adult ADHD, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia were recruited using a patient-oriented strategy involving outreach to local clinics and online portals (separate from the methods used to recruit healthy volunteers)

neuroscience↗