bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cusumano, J. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Cusumano, J. P..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Humans Adapt Multi-Objective Control of Stepping To Perform Lateral Maneuvers While Walking

To successfully traverse their environment, humans often perform maneuvers to achieve desired task goals while simultaneously maintaining balance. Humans accomplish these tasks primarily by modulating their foot placements. As humans are more unstable laterally, we must better understand how humans modulate lateral foot placement. We previously developed a theoretical framework and corresponding computational models to describe how humans regulate lateral stepping during straight-ahead continuous walking. We identified goal functions for step width and lateral body position that define the walking task and determine the set of all possible task solutions as Goal Equivalent Manifolds (GEMs). Here, we used this framework to determine if humans can regulate lateral stepping during non-steady-state lateral maneuvers by minimizing errors consistent with these goal functions. Twenty young healthy adults each performed four lateral lane-change maneuvers in a virtual reality environment. Extending our general lateral stepping regulation framework, we first re-examined the requirements of such transient walking tasks. Doing so yielded new theoretical predictions regarding how steps during any such maneuver should be regulated to minimize error costs, consistent with the goals required at each step and with how these costs are adapted at each step during the maneuver. Humans performed the experimental lateral maneuvers in a manner consistent with our theoretical predictions. Furthermore, their stepping behavior was well modeled by allowing the parameters of our previous lateral stepping models to adapt from step to step. To our knowledge, our results are the first to demonstrate humans might use evolving cost landscapes in real time to perform such an adaptive motor task and, furthermore, that such adaptation can occur quickly - over only one step. Thus, the predictive capabilities of our general stepping regulation framework extend to a much greater range of walking tasks beyond just normal, straight-ahead walking. AUTHOR SUMMARYWhen we walk in the real world, we rarely walk continuously in a straight line. Indeed, we regularly have to perform other tasks like stepping aside to avoid an obstacle in our path (either fixed or moving, like another person coming towards us). While we have to be highly maneuverable to accomplish such tasks, we must also maintain balance to avoid falling while doing so. This is challenging because walking humans are inherently more unstable side-to-side. Sideways falls are particularly dangerous for older adults as they can lead to hip fractures. Here, we establish a theoretical basis for how people might accomplish such maneuvers. We show that humans execute a simple lateral lane-change maneuver consistent with our theoretical predictions. Importantly, our simulations show they can do so by adapting at each step the same step-to-step regulation strategies they use to walk straight ahead. Moreover, these same control processes also explain how humans trade-off side-to-side stability to gain the maneuverability they need to perform such lateral maneuvers.

neuroscience↗

Humans trade-off energetic cost with fatigue avoidance while walking

Metabolic cost minimization is thought to underscore the neural control of locomotion. Yet, avoiding high muscle activation, a cause of fatigue, often outperforms energy minimization in computational predictions of human gait. Discerning the relative importance of these criteria in human walking has proved elusive, in part, because they have not been empirically decoupled. Here we explicitly decouple whole-body metabolic cost and fatigue-like muscle activation costs (estimated from electromyography) by pitting them against one another using two distinct gait tasks. When experiencing these competing costs, participants (N=10) chose the task that avoided overburdening muscles (fatigue avoidance) at the expense of higher metabolic power (p<0.05). Muscle volume-normalized activation more closely models energy use and was also minimized by the participants decision (p<0.05), demonstrating that muscle activation was, at best, an inaccurate signal for metabolic energy. Energy minimization was only observed when there was no adverse effect on muscle activation costs. By decoupling whole-body metabolic and muscle activation costs, we provide among the first empirical evidence of humans embracing non-energetic optimality in favor of a clearly defined neuromuscular objective. This finding indicates that local muscle fatigue and effort may well be key factors dictating human walking behavior and its evolution.

physiology↗

Viability, task switching, and fall avoidance of the simplest dynamic walker

Humans display great versatility when performing goal-directed tasks while walking. However, the extent to which such versatility helps with fall avoidance remains unclear. We recently demonstrated a functional connection between the motor regulation needed to achieve task goals (e.g. maintaining walking speed) and a simple walkers ability to reject large disturbances. Here, for the same model, we identify the viability kernel--the state space region in which the walker can step forever via at least one sequence of push-off inputs per state. We further find that only a few basins of attraction of the speed-regulated walkers steady-state gaits can fully cover the viability kernel. This highlights a potentially important role of task-level motor regulation in fall avoidance. Therefore, we posit an adaptive hierarchical control/regulation strategy that switches between different task-level regulators to avoid falls. Our hierarchical task switching controller only requires a target value of the regulated observable--a task switch--at each walking step, each chosen from a small, predetermined collection. Because humans have typically already learned to perform such tasks during nominal walking conditions, this suggests that the information cost of biologically implementing such controllers for the nervous system, including cognitive demands in humans, could be relatively low.

bioengineering↗

Rethinking Margin of Stability: Incorporating Step-To-Step Regulation to Resolve the Paradox

Derived from inverted pendulum dynamics, mediolateral Margin of Stability (MoSML) is a mechanically-grounded measure of instantaneous stability. However, average MoSML measures yield paradoxical results. Gait pathologies or perturbations often induce larger (supposedly "more stable") average MoSML, despite clearly destabilizing factors. However, people do not walk "on average" - they walk (and sometimes lose balance) one step at a time. We assert the paradox arises because averaging discards step-to-step dynamics. We present a framework unifying the inverted pendulum with Goal-Equivalent Manifold (GEM) analyses. We identify in the pendulums center-of-mass dynamics constant-MoSML manifolds, including one candidate "stability GEM" signifying the goal to maintain some constant [Formula]. We used this framework to assess step-to-step MoSML dynamics of humans walking in destabilizing environments. While goal-relevant deviations were readily corrected, humans did not exploit equifinality by allowing deviations to persist along this GEM. Thus, maintaining a constant [Formula] is inconsistent with observed step-to-step fluctuations in center-of-mass states. Conversely, the extent to which participants regulated fluctuations in foot placements strongly predicted regulation of center-of-mass fluctuations. Thus, center-of-mass dynamics may arise indirectly as a consequence of regulating mediolateral foot placements. To resolve the paradox caused by averaging MoSML, we present a new statistic, Probability of Instability (PoIL), to predict instability likelihood. Participants exhibited increased PoIL when destabilized (p = 9.45x10-34), despite exhibiting larger ("more stable") average MoSML (p = 1.70x10-15). Thus, PoIL correctly captured peoples increased risk of losing lateral balance, whereas average MoSML did not. PoIL also explains why peoples average MoSML increased in destabilizing contexts.

bioengineering↗