bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Currall, B. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Currall, B. B..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

MicroRNA-29a enhances and preserves stem-like CD8 T cell differentiation by regulating master epigenetic circuits of exhaustion.

CD8 T cells mediate protective immune responses. However, persisting antigens such as chronic viruses or tumors redirect CD8 T cell differentiation to a sub-optimal, epigenetically defined state called exhaustion. Exhausted T cells (TEX) lose their ability to persist long-term and to initiate functional memory responses. Checkpoint inhibitor blockade temporarily restores effector functions, but immune reinvigoration is not long-lasting, due to the epigenetic stability of TEX. Therefore, epigenetic reprogramming of TEX leading to durable T cell responses is essential to improve disease control. Here, we demonstrate that a single microRNA (miR), miR-29a, epigenetically re-directs TEX differentiation and preserves TEX into a stem-like state, leading to long-term persisting progenitor TEX. MiR-29a rewires epigenetic maintenance programs, including downregulation of key exhaustion-associated regulators (Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b), alongside increased expression of progenitor- and stemness-associated genes such as Tcf7 and Il7r. These reprogrammed CD8 T cells are more sensitive to PD-L1 checkpoint blockade. Ectopic expression of miR-29a combined with aPD-L1 treatments enhances effector responses, while preserving T cell stemness. Together, our findings suggest that miR-29a can be leveraged to overcome current barriers to immune checkpoint blockade. HighlightsO_LIMiR-29a rewires key exhaustion-associated epigenetic maintenance programs, while enhancing stemness-associated transcriptional circuits. C_LIO_LIMiR-29a drives extensive remodeling of accessible chromatin in TEX. C_LIO_LIMiR-29a preserves newly generated progenitor TEX in a durable, epigenetically defined stem-like state with increased effector function. C_LIO_LIMiR-29a synergizes with aPD-L1; while miR-29a preserves progenitor TEX state, addition of aPD-L1 enhances the cytotoxic potential of these progenitor TEX cells. C_LI

immunology↗

Tissue and cell-type specific molecular and functional signatures of 16p11.2 reciprocal genomic disorder across mouse brain and human neuronal models

Recurrent deletion and duplication of [~]743 kilobases of unique genomic sequence and segmental duplications at chromosome 16p11.2 underlie a reciprocal genomic disorder (RGD; OMIM 611913 and 614671) associated with neurodevelopmental and psychiatric phenotypes, including intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and schizophrenia (SCZ). To define molecular alterations associated with the 16p11.2 RGD, we performed transcriptome analyses of mice with reciprocal copy number variants (CNVs) of the syntenic chromosome 7qF3 region and human neuronal models derived from isogenic human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) carrying CRISPR-engineered CNVs at 16p11.2. Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in mouse cortex, striatum, cerebellum and three non-brain tissues, as well as in human neural stem cells and induced glutamatergic neurons revealed that the strongest and most consistent effects occurred within the CNV sequence, with notable instances of differential expression of genes in the immediate vicinity that could reflect position effect. While differential expression of genes outside of chromosome 16p11.2 was largely region, tissue, and cell type-specific, a small but significant minority of such DEGs was shared between brain regions or human cell types. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses to identify cellular processes dysregulated due to these CNVs found support in select circumstances for terms related to energy metabolism, RNA metabolism, and translation but did not reveal a single universally affected process. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis identified modules that showed significant correlation with reciprocal or individual CNV genotype and better captured shared effects, indicating that energy metabolism, RNA metabolism, translation and protein targeting were disrupted across all three brain regions. The first two of these processes also emerged in the human neural stem cell (NSC) data. A subset of co-expression modules that correlated with CNV genotype revealed significant enrichments for known neurodevelopmental disorder genes, loss-of-function constrained genes, FMRP targets, and chromatin modifiers. Intriguingly, neuronal differentiation of the hiPSCs revealed that both the deletion and duplication CNV resulted in similar deficits in neurite extension and branching and alterations in electrical activity. Finally, generation of cerebral organoid derivatives indicated that the CNVs reciprocally altered the ratio of excitatory and inhibitory GABAergic neurons generated during in vitro neurodevelopment, consistent with a major mechanistic hypothesis for ASD. Collectively, our data suggest that the 16p11.2 RGD involves disruption of multiple biological processes, with a relative impact that is context-specific. Perturbation of individual and multiple genes within the CNV region will be required to dissect single-gene effects, uncover regulatory interactions, and define how each contributes to abnormal neurodevelopment.

genomics↗

Systematic evaluation of genome sequencing as a first-tier diagnostic test for prenatal and pediatric disorders

Current clinical guidelines recommend three genetic tests for the assessment of fetal structural anomalies: karyotype to detect microscopically-visible balanced and unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements, chromosomal microarray (CMA) to detect sub-microscopic copy number variants (CNVs), and exome sequencing (ES) to identify individual nucleotide changes in coding sequence. Advances in genome sequencing (GS) analysis suggest that it is poised to displace the sequential application of all three conventional tests to become a single diagnostic approach for the assessment of fetal structural anomalies. However, systematic benchmarking is required to assure that GS can capture the full mutational spectrum associated with fetal structural anomalies and to accurately quantify the added diagnostic yield of GS. We applied a novel GS analytic framework that included the discovery, filtration, and interpretation of nine classes of genomic variation to 7,195 individuals. We assessed the sensitivity of GS to detect diagnostic variants (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) from three standard-of-care tests using 1,612 autism spectrum disorder quartet families (ASD; n=6,448) with matched GS, ES, and CMA data, and validated these findings in 46 fetuses with a clinically reportable variant originally identified by karyotype, CMA, or ES. We then assessed the added diagnostic yield of GS in 249 trios (n=747) comprising a fetus with a structural anomaly detected by ultrasound and two unaffected parents that were pre-screened with a combination of all three standard-of-care tests. Across both cohorts, our GS analytic framework identified 98.2% of all diagnostic variants detected by standard-of-care tests, including 100% of those originally detected by CMA (n=88) and ES (n=61), as well as 78.6% (n=11/14) of the chromosomal rearrangements identified by karyotype. The diagnostic yield from GS was 7.8% across all 1,612 ASD probands, almost two-fold more than CMA (4.4%) and three-fold more than ES (3.0%). We also demonstrated that the yield of ES can approach that of GS when CNVs are captured with high sensitivity from exome data (7.4% vs. 7.8%, respectively). In 249 pre-screened fetuses with structural anomalies, GS provided an additional diagnostic yield of 0.4% beyond the combination of all three tests (karyotype, CMA, and ES). Applying our benchmarking results to existing data indicates that GS can achieve an overall diagnostic yield of 46.1% in unselected fetuses with fetal structural anomalies, providing an estimated 17.2% increase in diagnostic yield over karyotype, 14.1% over CMA, and 36.1% over ES when sequence variants are assessed, and 4.1% when CNVs are also identified from exome data. In this study we demonstrate that GS is sensitive to the detection of almost all pathogenic variation captured by karyotype, CMA, and ES, provides a superior diagnostic yield than any individual test by a wide margin, and contributes a modest increase in diagnostic yield beyond the combination of all three tests. We also outline several strategies to aid the interpretation of GS variants that are cryptic to conventional technologies, which we anticipate will be increasingly encountered as comprehensive variant identification from GS is performed. Taken together, these data suggest GS warrants consideration as a first-tier diagnostic approach for fetal structural anomalies.

genomics↗

Limited contribution of rare, noncoding variation to autism spectrum disorder from sequencing of 2,076 genomes in quartet families

Genomic studies to date in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have largely focused on newly arising mutations that disrupt protein coding sequence and strongly influence risk. We evaluate the contribution of noncoding regulatory variation across the size and frequency spectrum through whole genome sequencing of 519 ASD cases, their unaffected sibling controls, and parents. Cases carry a small excess of de novo (1.02-fold) noncoding variants, which is not significant after correcting for paternal age. Assessing 51,801 regulatory classes, no category is significantly associated with ASD after correction for multiple testing. The strongest signals are observed in coding regions, including structural variation not detected by previous technologies and missense variation. While rare noncoding variation likely contributes to risk in neurodevelopmental disorders, no category of variation has impact equivalent to loss-of-function mutations. Average effect sizes are likely to be smaller than that for coding variation, requiring substantially larger samples to quantify this risk.

genomics↗