bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cullen, K. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Cullen, K. E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Internal states as a source of subject-dependent movement variability and their representation by large-scale networks

A humans ability to adapt and learn relies on reflecting on past performance. Such reflections form latent factors called internal states that induce variability of movement and behavior to improve performance. Internal states are critical for survival, yet their temporal dynamics and neural substrates are less understood. Here, we link internal states with motor performance and neural activity using state-space models and local field potentials captured from depth electrodes in over 100 brain regions. Ten human subjects performed a goal-directed center-out reaching task with perturbations applied to random trials, causing subjects to fail goals and reflect on their performance. Using computational methods, we identified two internal states, indicating that subjects kept track of past errors and perturbations, that predicted variability in reaction times and speed errors. These states granted access to latent information indicative of how subjects strategize learning from trial history, impacting their overall performance. We further found that large-scale brain networks differentially encoded these internal states. The dorsal attention network encoded past errors in frequencies above 100 Hz, suggesting a role in modulating attention based on tracking recent performance in working memory. The default network encoded past perturbations in frequencies below 15 Hz, suggesting a role in achieving robust performance in an uncertain environment. Moreover, these networks more strongly encoded internal states and were more functionally connected in higher performing subjects, whose learning strategy was to respond by countering with behavior that opposed accumulating error. Taken together, our findings suggest large-scale brain networks as a neural basis of strategy. These networks regulate movement variability, through internal states, to improve motor performance. Key pointsO_LIMovement variability is a purposeful process conjured up by the brain to enable adaptation and learning, both of which are necessary for survival. C_LIO_LIThe culmination of recent experiences--collectively referred to as internal states--have been implicated in variability during motor and behavioral tasks. C_LIO_LITo investigate the utility and neural basis of internal states during motor control, we estimated two latent internal states using state-space representation that modeled motor behavior during a goal-directed center-out reaching task in humans with simultaneous whole-brain recordings from intracranial depth electrodes. C_LIO_LIWe show that including these states--based on error and environment uncertainty--improves the predictability of subject-specific variable motor behavior and reveals latent information related to task performance and learning strategies where top performers counter error scaled by trial history while bottom performers maintain error tendencies. C_LIO_LIWe further show that these states are encoded by the large-scale brain networks known as the dorsal attention network and default network in frequencies above 100 Hz and below 15 Hz but found neural differences between subjects where network activity closely modulates with states and exhibits stronger functional connectivity for top performers. C_LIO_LIOur findings suggest the involvement in large-scale brain networks as a neural basis of motor strategy that orchestrates movement variability to improve motor performance. C_LI

neuroscience↗

Distinct Representations of Body and Head motion are Dynamically Encoded by Purkinje cell Populations in the Macaque Cerebellum

The ability to accurately control our posture and perceive spatial orientation during self-motion requires knowledge of the motion of both the head and body. However, whereas the vestibular sensors and nuclei directly encode head motion, no sensors directly encode body motion. Instead, the integration of vestibular and neck proprioceptive inputs is necessary to transform vestibular information into the body-centric reference frame required for postural control. The anterior vermis of the cerebellum is thought to play a key role in this transformation, yet how its Purkinje cells integrate these inputs or what information they dynamically encode during self-motion remains unknown. Here we recorded the activity of individual anterior vermis Purkinje cells in alert monkeys during passively applied whole-body, body-under-head, and head-on-body rotations. Most neurons dynamically encoded an intermediate representation of self-motion between head and body motion. Notably, these neurons responded to both vestibular and neck proprioceptive stimulation and showed considerable heterogeneity in their response dynamics. Furthermore, their vestibular responses demonstrated tuning in response to changes in head-on-body position. In contrast, a small remaining percentage of neurons sensitive only to vestibular stimulation unambiguously encoded head-in-space motion across conditions. Using a simple population model, we establish that combining responses from 40 Purkinje cells can explain the responses of their target neurons in deep cerebellar nuclei across all self-motion conditions. We propose that the observed heterogeneity in Purkinje cells underlies the cerebellums capacity to compute the dynamic representation of body motion required to ensure accurate postural control and perceptual stability in our daily lives.

neuroscience↗

The Rules of Pulsatile Neurostimulation

Electrical stimulation is a key tool in neuroscience, both in brain mapping studies and in many therapeutic applications such as cochlear, vestibular, and retinal neural implants. Due to safety considerations, stimulation is restricted to short biphasic pulses. Despite decades of research and development, neural implants lead to varying restoration of function in patients. In this study, we use computational modeling to provide an explanation for how pulsatile stimulation affects axonal channels and therefore leads to variability in restoration of neural responses. The phenomenological explanation is transformed into equations that predict induced firing rate as a function of pulse rate, pulse amplitude, and spontaneous firing rate. We show that these equations predict simulated responses to pulsatile stimulation with a variety of parameters as well as several features of experimentally recorded vestibular afferent responses to pulsatile stimulation. We then discuss the implications of these effects for improving clinical stimulation paradigms and electrical stimulation-based experiments.

neuroscience↗