Biology subjects

Crozier, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Crozier, L..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Tuning the open-close equilibrium of Cereblon with small molecules influences protein degradation

Most PROTACs and molecular glue degraders currently approved or in clinical trials recruit Cereblon (CRBN) as the ubiquitin E3 ligase. Upon binding ligands and molecular glues, CRBN undergoes a significant structural rearrangement from an open to closed state, defined by the positioning of the thalidomide-binding domain (TBD) with respect to the Lon domain. However, the exact molecular basis for this ligand-induced conformational change and its implication to neo-substrate degradation remain elusive. During our campaign to discover novel CRBN binders, we found hits exhibiting distinct biophysical behaviour from classical thalidomide-based ligands. By combining orthogonal biophysical methods of differential scanning fluorimetry, isothermal titration calorimetry, and small-angle X-ray scattering, supported by X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM structures of ligand-bound complexes, we classify CRBN binders between those that can induce CRBN closure, and those that cannot. Mutational studies identify key residues in the CRBN ligand binding pocket and N-terminal belt that are essential for the Lon and TBD domains to come together in the closed state. Finally, we show that the probability to yield active degrader molecules is greatly influenced by whether binders can or cannot induce CRBN closure. Together, our study reveals new molecular insights into the structural basis for how CRBN open-closed equilibrium is directly modulated by compound binding and impact target degradability by CRBN, with important implications to the design of PROTACs and molecular glue degraders.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2025

On-target toxicity limits the efficacy of CDK11 inhibition against cancers with 1p36 deletions

The cyclin-dependent kinase CDK11 is an understudied kinase that has been the subject of conflicting reports regarding its function in cancer. Here, we combine genetic and pharmacological approaches to demonstrate that CDK11 is a critical regulator of cancer cell survival that is required for RNA splicing and the expression of homologous recombination genes. Inhibition of CDK11 disrupts genome stability, promotes the retention of intronic sequences in mature mRNAs, and induces synthetic lethality with PARP inhibitors. Through integrative analysis of functional genomics datasets, we identify heterozygous deletions of chromosome 1p36 - which encompasses CDK11 and its activating cyclin CCNL2 - as a recurrent and predictive biomarker of sensitivity to CDK11 inhibition. To assess the therapeutic potential of CDK11, we develop MEL-495R, a selective and orally bioavailable CDK11 inhibitor. Additionally, we establish a genetically-engineered mouse model that allows us to differentiate between the on-target and off-target effects of CDK11 inhibitors in vivo. Using this platform, we demonstrate that MEL-495R induces widespread on-target toxicity, revealing a narrow therapeutic index. Together, these findings define CDK11 as a core cancer dependency, uncover a chromosomal deletion that sensitizes tumors to CDK11 inhibition, and provide a generalizable strategy for deconvolving drug efficacy and toxicity in vivo for novel oncology targets.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Cell overgrowth during G1 arrest triggers an osmotic stress response and chronic p38 activation to promote cell cycle exit

Cell size and the cell cycle are intrinsically coupled and abnormal increases in cell size are associated with senescence. The mechanism by which overgrowth primes cells to exit the cell cycle remains unclear. We investigate this using CDK4/6 inhibitors that arrest cell cycle progression in G0/G1 and are used to treat ER+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer. We demonstrate that long-term CDK4/6 inhibition promotes cellular overgrowth during the G0/G1 arrest, causing widespread proteome remodeling and p38-p53-p21-dependent cell cycle exit. Cell cycle exit is triggered by two waves of p21 induction. First, overgrowth during a G0/G1 arrest induces an osmotic stress response, producing the first wave of p21 induction. Second, when CDK4/6 inhibitors are removed, a fraction of cells escape G0/G1 arrest and enter S-phase where overgrowth-driven replication stress results in a second wave of p21 induction that causes cell cycle withdrawal from G2, or the subsequent G1. This could explain why cellular hypertrophy is associated with senescence and why CDK4/6 inhibitors have long-lasting anti-proliferative effects in patients.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Oncogenic signals prime cancer cells for toxic cell growth during a G1 cell cycle arrest

A long-term goal in cancer research has been to inhibit the cell cycle in tumour cells without causing toxicity in proliferative healthy tissues. The best evidence that this is achievable is provided by CDK4/6 inhibitors, which arrest the cell cycle in G1, are well-tolerated in patients, and are effective in treating ER+/HER2-breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibitors are effective because they arrest tumour cells more efficiently than some healthy cell types and, in addition, they affect the tumour microenvironment to enhance anti-tumour immunity. We demonstrate here another reason to explain their efficacy. Tumour cells are specifically vulnerable to CDK4/6 inhibition because during the G1 arrest, oncogenic signals drive toxic cell overgrowth. This overgrowth causes permanent cell cycle withdrawal by either preventing exit from G1 or by inducing replication stress and genotoxic damage during the subsequent S-phase and mitosis. Inhibiting or reverting oncogenic signals that converge onto mTOR can rescue this excessive growth, DNA damage and cell cycle exit in cancer cells. Conversely, inducing oncogenic signals in non-transformed cells can drive these toxic phenotypes and sensitize cells to CDK4/6 inhibition. Together, this demonstrates how oncogenic signals that have evolved to stimulate constitutive tumour growth and proliferation can be driven to cause toxic cell growth and irreversible cell cycle exit when proliferation is halted in G1.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

CDK4/6 inhibitors induce replication stress to cause long-term cell cycle withdrawal

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWCDK4/6 inhibitors arrest the cell cycle in G1-phase. They are approved to treat breast cancer and are also undergoing clinical trials against a range of other tumour types. To facilitate these efforts, it is important to understand why a cytostatic arrest in G1 causes long-lasting effects on tumour growth. Here we demonstrate that a prolonged G1-arrest following CDK4/6 inhibition downregulates replisome components and impairs origin licencing. This causes a failure in DNA replication after release from that arrest, resulting in a p53-dependent withdrawal from the cell cycle. If p53 is absent, then cells bypass the G2-checkpoint and undergo a catastrophic mitosis resulting in excessive DNA damage. These data therefore link CDK4/6 inhibition to genotoxic stress; a phenotype that is shared by most other broad-spectrum anti-cancer drugs. This provides a rationale to predict responsive tumour types and effective combination therapies, as demonstrated by the fact that CDK4/6 inhibition induces sensitivity to chemotherapeutics that also cause replication stress.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

A molecular explanation for PP2A-B56 isoform specificity during mitosis

PP2A-B56 is a serine/threonine phosphatase complex that regulates several major mitotic processes, including sister chromatid cohesion, kinetochore-microtubule attachment and the spindle assembly checkpoint. We show here that these key functions are shared between B56 isoforms which localise differentially to either the centromere or kinetochore. The centromeric B56 isoforms rely on a specific interaction with Sgo2, whereas the kinetochore isoforms bind preferentially to BubR1 and other proteins containing an LxxIxE motif. The molecular basis for this differential localisation can be mapped to a small C-terminal region in B56 that regulates these key interactions and defines whether PP2A-B56 complexes bind to either the centromere or kinetochore. Together, this study describes how different PP2A-B56 complexes utilise isoform-specific interactions to control distinct processes during mitosis.

cell biology↗