bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Crosbie, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Crosbie, J..

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Charting developmental trajectories of dynamic brain networks during emotional face processing

Emotional face processing is a critical component in the development of social cognition through childhood. The neural mechanisms supporting this development can be understood by tracking age-related changes in brain activity. Prior work in this area with MEG relies on static, bandlimited, or region-specific measures, which do not capture the dynamic, distributed nature of brain activity. Here we used Dynamic Network Modes (DyNeMo) to analyze MEG data from a large cohort of typically developing individuals (N=224, ages 5-40) during an emotional faces vigilance task. DyNeMo is a data-driven, generative modelling approach which captures functional networks as a set of whole-brain spatiospectral "modes" whose relative mixture (i.e., activation levels) can change dynamically in response to stimuli. We inferred six modes from the MEG data and characterized developmental trajectories in task-related activation and mode connectivity. Across modes we observed distinct developmental trajectories in both measures. With respect to mode activation, a visual mode and a frontotemporal mode (whose labels reflect their respective spatial profiles) increased nonlinearly with age; meanwhile, activation in temporal and sensorimotor modes decreased linearly with age. Meanwhile, connectivity broadly increased with age in all modes, but with different degrees of nonlinearity. These results suggest developmental dissociations between different modes (e.g., visual versus sensorimotor), as well as within individual modes (task-related mode activation versus connectivity). These results provide a comprehensive and complex picture of functional network development underlying emotional face processing. Significance StatementBrain networks supporting social cognition undergo profound changes from childhood through adolescence to adulthood. However, current understanding of how these networks develop has been limited by conventional analyses of brain imaging data, which typically provide a static picture of brain activity. Here we leveraged a cutting-edge, data-driven modeling approach (DyNeMo) to characterize age-related changes in distributed and dynamic networks supporting emotional face processing, in a large cohort of children and young adults (N=224). We inferred six functional networks whose activation levels changed rapidly in response to emotional faces. Network activation and connectivity exhibited profound and distinct non-linear changes with age, indicating that emotional face processing is supported by complex interactions among multiple dynamic networks, each with different maturational trajectories.

neuroscience↗

Functional organization of multisensory integration network in children and youth with neurodevelopmental disorders predicts clinical sensory issues

Differences in sensory processing in neurodevelopmental conditions, including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), cascade into downstream clinical symptomatology. This includes differences in combining sensory information from multiple modalities into a unified percept, known as multisensory integration. Little is known about the functional organization of multisensory network (MSN) in these groups, its relation to clinical sensory issues, or its interaction with other higher-order cortical networks. We examined resting-state fMRI data from 417 participants in the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Network (ASD=174, ADHD=130, Typical Development=113; Mean age=11.96{+/-}4.10). Timeseries data were extracted from the MSN and seven additional resting-state cortical networks (RSNs). Undirected and directed functional connectivity (FC) metrics were computed within the MSN and between the MSN and other RSNs. FC was compared across diagnoses and related to clinical sensory characteristics. The thalamus emerged as a hub region in both undirected and directed FC within the MSN and between the MSN-RSNs. Some diagnosis-related differences were observed, with increased MSN-RSN FC particularly in ADHD; however, associations with sensory characteristics were stronger in both undirected and directed FC within the MSN and between the MSN-RSNs, regardless of diagnosis. Converging evidence was seen in data-driven clusters based on FC metrics, which did not align with diagnosis, but instead mapped on to the overall level of sensory issues reported. That the data-driven clusters sorted not by diagnosis but by sensory characteristics suggests that these sensory characteristics and their underlying neurobiology are transdiagnostic in nature as opposed to specific to ASD or ADHD.

neuroscience↗

Assigning Targetable Molecular Pathways to Transdiagnostic Subgroups Across Autism and Related Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The heterogeneity of autism and related neurodevelopmental conditions has impeded accurate prognoses and treatment discovery. Using translational neuroimaging across 135 mouse models (3,515 mice) and two human MRI datasets (n = 1,234 and n = 1,015), we derived participant subgroups from shared neuroanatomical features. These subgroups did not distinguish autism, ADHD, or OCD diagnoses and only modestly differentiated cognitive and behavioural phenotypes. Instead, they mapped onto four molecular pathways: (1) synaptic function; (2) MAPK and Wnt signalling; (3) chromatin modification and cellular stress responses; and (4) broader chromatin, immune, and second-messenger signalling pathways. This framework bridges preclinical models and idiopathic human neurodevelopmental conditions, linking patients to biologically relevant molecular mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

Decoding the neural basis of sensory phenotypes in Autism

BackgroundDifferences in sensory processing are a defining characteristic of autism, affecting up to 87% of autistic individuals. These differences cause widespread perceptual changes that can negatively impact cognition, development, and daily functioning. Recent research identified five sensory processing phenotypes with varied behavioural presentations; however, their neural basis remains unclear. This study aims to ground these sensory phenotypes in unique patterns of functional connectivity. MethodsWe analyzed data from 146 autistic participants in the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Network. We classified participants into sensory phenotypes using k-means clustering of scores from the Short Sensory Profile. We then computed a connectivity matrix from 200 cortical and 32 subcortical regions and calculated graph-theoretic measures (betweenness centrality, strength, local efficiency, clustering coefficient) to assess information exchange between these regions. We then trained machine learning models to use these measures to classify between all pairs of sensory phenotypes. ResultsWe replicated that our sample of autistic participants was best categorized into five sensory phenotypes. The machine learning models distinguished 7/10 phenotype pairs using graph-theoretic measures (p < 0.005). Information exchange within and between the somatomotor network, orbitofrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, prefrontal cortex and subcortical areas were highly predictive of sensory phenotype. ConclusionsThis study shows that distinct sensory phenotypes in autism correspond with unique patterns of functional connectivity. Cortical, subcortical, and network-level connectivity all play a role in shaping distinct sensory processing styles in autism. These findings lay the groundwork for understanding these phenotypes and highlight opportunities to develop interventions in cases of maladaptive sensory processing.

neuroscience↗

Using deep learning to predict internalizing problems from brain structure

Internalizing problems (e.g., anxiety and depression) are associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes. While some predictors of internalizing problems are known (e.g., their frequent co-occurrence with neurodevelopmental (ND) conditions), the biological markers of internalizing problems are not well understood. Here, we used deep learning, a powerful tool for identifying complex and multi-dimensional brain-behaviour relationships, to predict cross-sectional and worsening longitudinal trajectories of internalizing problems. Data were extracted from four large-scale datasets: the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, the Healthy Brain Network, the Human Connectome Project Development study, and the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental network. We developed deep learning models that used measures of brain structure (thickness, surface area, and volume) to (a) predict clinically significant internalizing problems cross-sectionally (N=14,523); and (b) predict subsequent worsening trajectories (using the reliable change index) of internalizing problems (N=10,540) longitudinally. A stratified cross-validation scheme was used to tune, train, and test the models, which were evaluated using the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC). The cross-sectional model performed well across the sample, reaching an AUC of 0.80[95% CI: 0.71,0.88]. For the longitudinal model, while performance was sub-optimal for predicting worsening trajectories in a sample of the general population (AUC=0.66[0.65,0.67]), good performance was achieved in a small, external test set of primarily ND conditions (AUC=0.80[0.78,0.81]), as well as across all ND conditions (AUC=0.73[0.70,0.76]). Deep learning with features of brain structure is a promising avenue for biomarkers of internalizing problems, particularly for individuals who have a higher likelihood of experiencing difficulties.

neuroscience↗

Dataset factors influencing age-related changes in brain structure and function in neurodevelopmental conditions

With brain structure and function undergoing complex changes throughout childhood and adolescence, age is a critical consideration in neuroimaging studies, particularly for those of individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions. However, despite the increasing use of large, consortium-based datasets to examine brain structure and function in neurotypical and neurodivergent populations, it is unclear whether age-related changes are consistent between datasets, and whether inconsistencies related to differences in sample characteristics, such as demographics and phenotypic features, exist. To address this, we built models of age-related changes of brain structure (regional cortical thickness and regional surface area; N=1,218) and function (resting-state functional connectivity strength; N=1,254) in two neurodiverse datasets: the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental network (POND) and the Healthy Brain Network (HBN). We examined whether deviations from these models differed between the datasets, and explored whether these deviations were associated with demographic and clinical variables. We found significant differences between the two datasets for measures of cortical surface area and functional connectivity strength throughout the brain. For regional measures of cortical surface area, the patterns of differences were associated with race/ethnicity, while for functional connectivity strength, positive associations were observed with head motion. Our findings highlight that patterns of age-related changes in the brain may be influenced by demographic and phenotypic characteristics, and thus future studies should consider these when examining or controlling for age effects in analyses.

neuroscience↗

Brain charts for the human lifespan

Over the past few decades, neuroimaging has become a ubiquitous tool in basic research and clinical studies of the human brain. However, no reference standards currently exist to quantify individual differences in neuroimaging metrics over time, in contrast to growth charts for anthropometric traits such as height and weight1. Here, we built an interactive resource to benchmark brain morphology, www.brainchart.io, derived from any current or future sample of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. With the goal of basing these reference charts on the largest and most inclusive dataset available, we aggregated 123,984 MRI scans from 101,457 participants aged from 115 days post-conception through 100 postnatal years, across more than 100 primary research studies. Cerebrum tissue volumes and other global or regional MRI metrics were quantified by centile scores, relative to non-linear trajectories2 of brain structural changes, and rates of change, over the lifespan. Brain charts identified previously unreported neurodevelopmental milestones3; showed high stability of individual centile scores over longitudinal assessments; and demonstrated robustness to technical and methodological differences between primary studies. Centile scores showed increased heritability compared to non-centiled MRI phenotypes, and provided a standardised measure of atypical brain structure that revealed patterns of neuroanatomical variation across neurological and psychiatric disorders. In sum, brain charts are an essential first step towards robust quantification of individual deviations from normative trajectories in multiple, commonly-used neuroimaging phenotypes. Our collaborative study proves the principle that brain charts are achievable on a global scale over the entire lifespan, and applicable to analysis of diverse developmental and clinical effects on human brain structure. Furthermore, we provide open resources to support future advances towards adoption of brain charts as standards for quantitative benchmarking of typical or atypical brain MRI scans.

neuroscience↗

Cortico-amygdalar connectivity and externalizing/internalizing behavior in children with neurodevelopmental disorders

BackgroundExternalizing and internalizing behaviors are common and contribute to impairment in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Associations between externalizing or internalizing behaviors and cortico-amygdalar connectivity have been found in children with and without clinically significant internalizing/externalizing behaviors. This study examined whether such associations are present across children with different NDDs. MethodsMulti-modal neuroimaging and behavioral data from the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Disorders (POND) Network were used. POND participants aged 6-18 years with a primary diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), as well as typically developing children (TDC) with T1-weighted, resting-state fMRI or diffusion weighted imaging and parent-report Child Behavioral Checklist (CBCL) data available, were analyzed (n range=157-346). Associations between externalizing or internalizing behavior and cortico-amygdalar structural and functional connectivity indices were examined using linear regressions, controlling for age, gender, and image-modality specific covariates. Behavior-by-diagnosis interaction effects were also examined. ResultsNo significant linear associations (or diagnosis-by-behavior interaction effects) were found between CBCL-measured externalizing or internalizing behaviors and any of the connectivity indices examined. Post-hoc bootstrapping analyses indicated stability and reliability of these null results. ConclusionsThe current study provides evidence in favour of the absence of a shared linear relationship between internalizing or externalizing behaviors and cortico-amygdalar connectivity properties across a transdiagnostic sample of children with various NDDs and TDC. Detecting shared brain-behavior relationships in children with NDDs may benefit from the use of different methodological approaches, including incorporation of multi-dimensional behavioral data (i.e. behavioral assessments, neurocognitive tasks, task-based fMRI) or clustering approaches to delineate whether subgroups of individuals with different brain-behavior profiles are present within heterogeneous cross-disorder samples.

neuroscience↗

Integration of Brain and Behavior Measures for Identification of Data-Driven Groups Cutting Across Children with ASD, ADHD, or OCD

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are clinically and biologically heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The objective of the present study was to integrate brain imaging and behavioral measures to identify new brain-behavior subgroups cutting across these disorders. A subset of the data from the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Disorder (POND) Network including participants with different NDDs (aged 6-16 years) that underwent cross-sectional T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning on the same 3T scanner, and behavioral/cognitive assessments was used. Similarity Network Fusion was applied to integrate cortical thickness, subcortical volume, white matter fractional anisotropy (FA), and behavioral measures in 176 children with ASD, ADHD or OCD with complete data that passed quality control. Normalized mutual information (NMI) was used to determine top contributing model features. Bootstrapping, out-of-model outcome measures and supervised machine learning were each used to examine stability and evaluate the new groups. Cortical thickness in socio-emotional and attention/executive networks and inattention symptoms comprised the top ten features driving participant similarity and differences between four transdiagnostic groups. Subcortical volumes (pallidum, nucleus accumbens, thalamus) were also different among groups, although white matter FA showed limited differences. Features driving participant similarity remained stable across resampling, and the new groups showed significantly different scores on everyday adaptive functioning. Our findings open the possibility of studying new data-driven groups that represent children with NDDs more similar to each other than others within their own diagnostic group. Such new groups can be evaluated longitudinally for prognostic utility and could be stratified for clinical trials targeted toward each groups unique brain and behavioral profiles.

neuroscience↗

Genome-wide Association Study of Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Traits: Shared Genetic Risk between Traits and Disorder

ObjectiveTo identify genetic variants associated with obsessive-compulsive (OC) traits and test for sharing of genetic risks between OC traits and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). MethodsWe conducted a genome-wide association analysis of OC traits using the Toronto Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (TOCS) in 5018 unrelated Caucasian children and adolescents from the community (Spit for Science sample). We tested the hypothesis that genetic variants associated with OC traits from the community would be associated with clinical OCD using a meta-analysis of three OCD case-controls samples (cases=3384, controls=8363). Shared genetic risk was examined between OC traits and OCD in the respective samples using polygenic risk score and genetic correlation analyses. ResultsA locus tagged by rs7856850 in an intron of PTPRD (protein tyrosine phosphatase {delta}) was significantly associated with OC traits at the genome-wide significance level (p=2.48x10-8). The rs7856850 locus was also associated with OCD in a meta-analysis of three independent OCD case/control genome-wide datasets (p=0.0069). Polygenic risk scores derived from OC traits were significantly associated with OCD in a sample of childhood-onset OCD and vice versa (ps<0.01). OC traits were highly but not significantly genetically correlated with OCD (rg=0.83, p=0.07). ConclusionsWe report the first validated genome-wide significant variant for OC traits. OC traits measured in the community sample shared genetic risk with OCD case/control status. Our results demonstrate the importance of the type of measure used to measure traits as well as the feasibility and power of using trait-based approaches in community samples for genetic discovery.

genomics↗

Genetic overlap between obsessive-compulsive disorder, related symptoms in the population and insulin signaling: etiological implications

ObjectiveObsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) in the population have been linked to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in genetic and epidemiological studies. Insulin signaling has been implicated in OCD. We extend previous work by assessing genetic overlap between OCD, population-based OCS, and central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral insulin signaling.\n\nMethodsWe conducted genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in the population-based Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC, 650 children and adolescents) of the total OCS score and six OCS factors from an exploratory factor analysis of 22 questions. Subsequently, we performed polygenic risk score (PRS) analysis to assess shared genetic etiologies between clinical OCD (using GWAS data from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium), the total OCS score and OCS factors. We then performed gene-set analyses with a set of OCD-linked genes centered around CNS insulin-regulated synaptic function and PRS analyses for five peripheral insulin signaling-related traits. For validation purposes, we explored data from the independent Spit for Science population cohort (5047 children and adolescents).\n\nResultsIn the PNC, we found a shared genetic etiology between OCD and impairment, contamination/cleaning and guilty taboo thoughts. In the Spit for Science cohort, we were able to validate the finding for contamination/cleaning, and additionally observed genetic sharing between OCD and symmetry/counting/ordering. The CNS insulin-linked gene-set associated with symmetry/counting/ordering. We also identified genetic sharing between peripheral insulin signaling-related traits (type 2 diabetes and the blood levels of HbA1C, fasting insulin and 2 hour glucose) and OCD as well as certain OCS.\n\nConclusionsOCD, OCS in the population and insulin-related traits share genetic risk factors, indicating a common etiological mechanism underlying somatic and psychiatric disorders.

genetics↗

Utility of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Trait Measure in Population Genetics: A Polygenic Risk Study

BackgroundValid and genetically-informative trait measures of psychopathology collected in the general population would provide a powerful complement to case/control genetic designs. We report the convergent, predictive and discriminant validity of the parent- and the self-report versions of the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior Rating Scale (SWAN) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) traits. We tested if SWAN ADHD scores were associated with ADHD diagnosis, ADHD polygenic risk, as well as with traits and polygenic risk for co-occurring disorders such as anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).\n\nMethodsWe collected parent- and self-report SWAN scores in a community sample (n=15,560; 6-18 years of age) and created norms. Sensitivity-specificity analyses determined SWAN cut-points that discriminated those with a community ADHD diagnosis (n=972) from those without a community diagnosis. We validated cut-points from the community sample in a clinical sample (266 ADHD cases; 36 controls). We tested if SWAN scores were associated with anxiety and obsessive-compulsive (OC) traits and polygenic risk for ADHD, OCD and anxiety disorders.\n\nResultsBoth the parent- and the self-report SWAN measures showed high convergent validity with established ADHD measures and distinguished ADHD participants with high sensitivity and specificity in the community sample. Cut-points established in the community sample discriminated ADHD clinic cases from controls with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 94%. High parent- and self-report SWAN scores and scores above the community-based cut-points were associated with polygenic risk for ADHD. High ADHD traits were associated with high anxiety traits, but not OC traits. SWAN scores were not associated with OCD or anxiety disorder polygenic risk.\n\nConclusionThe parent- and self-report SWAN are potentially useful in genetic research because they predict ADHD diagnoses and are associated with ADHD polygenic risk.

genetics↗

Factor Structure and Heritability of Obsessive-Compulsive Traits in Children and Adolescents in the General Population

BackgroundObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a heritable childhood-onset psychiatric disorder that may represent the extreme of obsessive-compulsive (OC) traits that are widespread in the general population. We studied the factor structure and heritability of the Toronto Obsessive Compulsive Scale (TOCS), a new measure designed to assess traits associated with OCD in children and adolescents. We also examined the degree to which genetic effects are unique and shared between dimensions.\n\nMethodsOC traits were measured using the TOCS in 16,718 children and adolescents (6 to 18 years) at a local science museum. Factor analysis was conducted to identify OC trait dimensions. Univariate and multivariate twin modeling was performed to estimate the heritability of OC trait dimensions in a subset of twins (220 pairs).\n\nResultsSix OC dimensions were identified: Cleaning/Contamination, Hoarding, Rumination, Superstition, Counting/Checking, and Symmetry/Ordering. The TOCS total score (74%) and OC trait dimensions were heritable (30-77%). Hoarding was phenotypically distinct but shared genetic effects with other OC dimensions. Most of the genetic effects were shared between dimensions while unique environment accounted for the majority of dimension-specific variance, except for hoarding which had considerable unique genetic factors. A latent trait did not account for the shared variance between dimensions.\n\nConclusionsOC traits and individual OC dimensions were heritable, although the degree of shared and dimension-specific etiological factors varied by dimension. The TOCS is useful for genetic research of OC traits and OC dimensions should be examined individually and together along with total trait scores to characterize OC genetic architecture.

genetics↗