Crofoot, M. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2023

Estimating individuals' exposure to predation risk in group-living baboons, Papio anubis

In environments with multiple predators, the vulnerabilities attached to the spatial positions of group-living prey are not uniform and depend on the hunting styles of the predators. Coursing predators, mainly canids and hyenas, follow their prey over long distances and attack open areas, making individuals at the edge of the group more dangerous than those at the center (marginal predation). In contrast, ambush predators, mainly cats, approach their prey undetected and appear randomly anywhere in the group; therefore, isolated individuals are at a greater risk of predation. However, identifying individuals at high risk of predation requires the simultaneous recording of predator locations and direct observation of predation events, which are both difficult. Therefore, several theoretical methods have been proposed to assess predation risk (predation risk proxies). In a group of wild anubis baboons exposed to predation by leopards, lions, and hyenas, we calculated predation risk proxies using movement data collected from global positioning system (GPS) collars and found that adult males were on the edge of the group with a higher risk of predation (Hypothesis 1). In addition, adult males were more isolated within this group (Hypothesis 2). None of the predation risks differed among the other age-sex classes. The most dominant male was expected to be in the safety center of the group (Hypothesis 3) but was isolated on the periphery, like the other males. Therefore, we discussed why adult males were more peripheral and isolated.

zoology↗

bioRxiv2021

Animal lifestyle changes acceptable mass limits for attached tags

O_LIAnimal-attached devices have transformed our understanding of vertebrate ecology. To minimize tag-related harm for these studies, researchers have long advocated that tag masses should not exceed 3% of the animals body mass. However, this proposition ignores tag forces generated as a result of animal movement. C_LIO_LIUsing data from collar-attached accelerometers on diverse free-ranging terrestrial animals, we detail a tag-based acceleration method (TbAM) in which we quantify animal athleticism in terms of fractions of animal movement time devoted to different collar-recorded accelerations. The varying accelerations are converted to forces imposed on the animals based on the acceleration and tag mass and allow derivation of defined force limits, including those amounting to 3% of the animals mass, for specified fractions of any animals active time. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate how species athleticism is the principal determinant of tag forces, whereas body mass is of little importance. Forces exerted by 3% tags were mostly equivalent to 4-19% of the animals masses during moving, with a maximum of 54% in a hunting cheetah. Cumulative frequency curves of tag acceleration for periods when animals were active, all showed a characteristic sigmoid pattern, which was displaced further to the right as higher acceleration activities accounted for an increasing proportion of any animals time. Specifying that tags should exert forces that are less than 3% of the animals body mass for 95% of the time led to corrected tag masses constituting between 1.6% and 2.98% of our study animals masses, with values depending on animal athleticism. C_LIO_LIRecognition that animal athleticism affects tag forces of their carriers fundamentally changes how acceptable tag mass limits should be determined by ethics bodies. In order to have a scientifically robust acceptable threshold to limit the forces experienced by an animal carrier, we suggest practitioners derive a similar cumulative acceleration profile for their study species and use a minimum of the 95% limits on the plot (although higher limits may be more appropriate). C_LI

zoology↗