bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cowley, S. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Cowley, S. M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Rapid degradation of 6 class I HDAC complexes reveals minimal functional overlap between complexes

The class 1 HDACs 1, 2 and 3 form seven families of distinct large multiprotein complexes that regulate gene expression via deacetylation of lysines in histone tails. The degree of redundancy and functional overlap between complexes and their primary gene targets, remains unknown. We used CRISPR/Cas9 to independently tag HDAC complexes with FKBP12F36V in HCT116 cells enabling rapid (<1 hr), PROTAC-mediated, degradation. RNA sequencing at 6 h reveals that together, the 4 major complexes (CoREST, NuRD, NCoR/SMRT and SIN3A) perturbed >50% of expressed genes. More than 60% of these are specific to an individual complex. Of genes regulated by more than one complex, approaching 50% are reciprocally regulated such that HDAC complexes act as antagonistic regulators. Homer analysis strongly suggests that the complexes are reliant on different transcription factors. This is the first study to identify the primary targets of individual HDAC complexes and directly compare the effects of rapid degradation on gene regulation in the same biological system.

molecular biology↗

Mutations on the surface of HDAC1 reveal molecular determinants of specific complex assembly and their requirement for gene regulation

Histone deacetylase 1 and 2 (HDAC1/2) are highly related enzymes that regulate histone acetylation levels in all cells, as catalytic and structural components of six unique multiprotein complexes: SIN3, NuRD, CoREST, MIDAC, MIER and RERE. Co-immunoprecipitation of HDAC1-Flag followed by mass spectrometry revealed that 92% of HDAC1 in mouse embryonic stem cells resides in 3 complexes, NuRD (49%), CoREST (28%) and SIN3 (15%). We compared the structures of MTA1:HDAC1 and MIDAC:HDAC1 to identify critical binding residues on the surface of HDAC1. Surprisingly, a single mutation, Y48E, disrupts binding to all complexes except SIN3. Rescue experiments performed with HDAC1-Y48E in HDAC1/2 double-knockout cells, showed that retention of SIN3 binding alone is sufficient for cell viability. Gene expression and histone acetylation patterns were perturbed in both Y48E and a second mutant cell line, HDAC1-E63R, indicating that cells require a full repertoire of the HDAC1/2 complexes to regulate their transcriptome appropriately. Comparative analysis of MTA1/HDAC1 and SIN3B/HDAC2 structures confirmed the differential modes of HDAC1 recruitment, such that Y48 interacts with ELM2/SANT domain-containing proteins, but not SIN3. The E63R mutation shows markedly reduced binding to NuRD and MiDAC complexes, but retains some CoREST binding. We provide novel molecular insights into the abundance, co-factors and assemblies of this crucial family of chromatin modifying machines.

molecular biology↗

Rapid degradation of Histone Deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) reveals essential roles in both gene repression and active transcription

Histone Deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) removes acetyl groups from lysine residues on the core histones, a critical step in the regulation of chromatin accessibility. Despite histone deacetylation being an apparently repressive activity, suppression of HDACs causes both up- and down-regulation of gene expression. Here we exploited the degradation tag (dTAG) system to rapidly degrade HDAC1 in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) lacking its paralog, HDAC2. Unlike HDAC inhibitors that lack isoform specificity, the dTAG system allowed specific degradation and removal of HDAC1 in <1 hour (100x faster than genetic knockouts). This rapid degradation caused increased histone acetylation in as little as 2 hours, with H2BK5 and H2BK11 being the most sensitive. The majority of differentially expressed genes following 2 hours of HDAC1 degradation were upregulated (275 genes up vs 15 down) with increased proportions of downregulated genes observed at 6 (1,153 up vs 443 down) and 24 hours (1,146 up vs 967 down) respectively. Upregulated genes showed increased H2BK5ac and H3K27ac around their transcriptional start site (TSS). In contrast, decreased acetylation of super-enhancers (SEs) was linked to the most strongly downregulated genes. These findings suggest a paradoxical role for HDAC1 in the maintenance of histone acetylation levels at critical enhancer regions required for the pluripotency-associated gene network.

molecular biology↗

Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) maintain expression of the pluripotent gene network via recruitment of RNA polymerase II to coding and non-coding loci

Histone acetylation is a dynamic modification regulated by the opposing actions of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Deacetylation of histone tails results in chromatin tightening and therefore HDACs are generally regarded as transcriptional repressors. Counterintuitively, simultaneous deletion of Hdac1 and Hdac2 in embryonic stem cells (ESC) reduced expression of pluripotent transcription factors, Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog (OSN). By shaping global histone acetylation patterns, HDACs indirectly regulate the activity of acetyl-lysine readers, such as the transcriptional activator, BRD4. We used inhibitors of HDACs and BRD4 (LBH589 and JQ1 respectively) in combination with precision nuclear run-on and sequencing (PRO-seq) to examine their roles in defining the ESC transcriptome. Both LBH589 and JQ1 caused a marked reduction in the pluripotent network. However, while JQ1 treatment induced widespread transcriptional pausing, HDAC inhibition caused a reduction in both paused and elongating polymerase, suggesting an overall reduction in polymerase recruitment. Using enhancer RNA (eRNA) expression to measure enhancer activity we found that LBH589-sensitive eRNAs were preferentially associated with super-enhancers and OSN binding sites. These findings suggest that HDAC activity is required to maintain pluripotency by regulating the OSN enhancer network via the recruitment of RNA polymerase II.

molecular biology↗