bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Coulibaly, Y. I.

Publications and source records attributed to Coulibaly, Y. I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mosquito collection method assessments for xenomonitoring in two cross-bordering villages with different ecosystems, Yanfolila, Mali, 2022-2023

Entomological surveillance is essential for the control of lymphatic filariasis (LF). This xenomonitoring study, conducted in 2022-2023, evaluated the effectiveness of three mosquito trapping methods to identify the most suitable tool for surveillance following the discontinuation of mass drug administration. The surveys took place in two Malian villages: Konfra (seasonal watercourse) and Siradjouba (permanent watercourse). Three techniques were compared: Pyrethrum spray catch (PSC) conducted at the end of each visit inside 30 randomly selected houses, and different collection points were chosen based on the characteristics of the study area to place the Ifakara Type C tent (Ifakara) and the gravid trap (GT). Collections were conducted simultaneously at both sites. All Anopheles gambiae and Culex spp. collected in 2022-2023 were morphologically identified and then analyzed in the laboratory for their infectious status. Data was processed using SPSS v25; Fishers exact test was used to compare proportions, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. A total of 4,732 mosquitoes were captured (95.05% in 2022). In 2022, the Anopheles were predominant in Konfra (91.38%), while Culex predominated in Siradjouba (63.41%). In 2023, Anopheles was found only in Konfra (3 specimens), while Culex was predominant in Siradjouba (64.07%). In 2022, PSC collected 90.57% of Anopheles, Ifakara 9.43%, and GT 0%. For Culex, GT collected 53.67%, PSC 36.62%, and Ifakara 9.71%. In 2023, the few Anopheles (3) came from PSC; Culex were mainly collected by the Ifakara tent (43.29%). For FL xenomonitoring, the combination of PSC and the GT appear to be effective collection methods.

ecology↗

Human Migration and the Spread of the Nematode Parasite Wuchereria bancrofti

The human disease lymphatic filariasis causes the debilitating effects of elephantiasis and hydrocele. Lymphatic filariasis currently affects the lives of 90 million people in 52 countries. There are three nematodes that cause lymphatic filariasis, Brugia malayi, B. timori, and Wuchereria bancrofti, but 90% of all cases of lymphatic filariasis are caused solely by W. bancrofti. Here we use population genomics to identify the geographic origin of W. bancrofti and reconstruct its spread. Previous genomic sequencing efforts have suffered from difficulties in obtaining Wb DNA. We used selective whole genome amplification to enrich W. bancrofti DNA from infected blood samples and were able to analyze 47 whole genomes of W. bancrofti from endemic locations in Haiti, Mali, Kenya, and Papua New Guinea. Our results are consistent with a Southeast Asia or East Asia origin for W. bancrofti spread around the globe by infecting migrating populations of humans. Austronesians probably introduced W. ban-crofti to Madagascar where later migrations moved it to continental Africa. From Africa, W. bancrofti spread to the New World during the transatlantic slave trade. The greater genetic diversity of W. bancrofti populations from Haiti are also consistent with genetic admixture from multiple source populations. Genome scans for locally adapted haplotypes identified genes associated with human immune suppression and insecticide sensitivity. Locally adapted haplotypes may provide a foundation to understand the distribution of W. bancrofti compared to that of other filarial nematodes and how populations may differ in response to eradication efforts.

evolutionary biology↗