Biology subjects

Cottingham, R. W.

Publications and source records attributed to Cottingham, R. W..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

The ModelSEED Biochemistry Database, 2026 update: grading multi-source thermodynamics

The ModelSEED Biochemistry Database (https://modelseed.org) supplies foundational mass- and charge-balanced reaction networks for metabolic reconstructions. Here we present an update on the biochemistry where the database has been expanded to [~] 46,000 compounds, and [~] 56,000 reactions, featuring [~] 37,000 metabolic structures. We have expanded our approach for handling thermodynamic data, enabling multiple sources of data to be derived, integrated, and presented to the wider research community. We now publish predictions of pKa, reaction energy (and respective uncertainties), and estimates of reaction direction from multiple independent sources. Each reaction is graded gold, silver or bronze according to the strength of the evidence behind it, so that users can weigh its reliability directly. We also release reaction directions predicted by an ensemble of large language models. This multi-source approach exposes agreements and discrepancies between sources for [~] 33,000 reactions. Finally, to ensure data integrity, a new conflict-resolution pipeline reconciles structures across sources, documenting input from curators. Our work is publicly available at https://github.com/ModelSEED/ModelSEEDDatabase.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2026

Data coherence over data volume drives generalisable genome-based prediction of microbial carbon utilisation

Microbial carbon utilisation is a foundational ecological phenotype that remains difficult to predict from genomes despite well-characterised pathways. Machine-learning models generalise poorly across datasets, a failure usually attributed to training-set size and taxonomic bias. To test this, we integrated binary growth phenotypes for 819 strains across 240 carbon sources from four datasets. Balanced accuracy fell from 0.86 within datasets to 0.62 across them, and testing on close relatives recovered only 0.03 of that drop, so mechanistically inconsistent genotype-phenotype relationships drove models to dataset-correlated shortcuts. Restricting training to concordant samples (measured growth matched their annotated pathway) doubled the carbon sources recovering known pathway genes across datasets (6 to 12 of 15), whereas matched random subsets did not. Adding over 8000 literature-curated BacDive genomes to the training set did not improve cross-dataset performance more than the smaller concordant set, suggesting coherence matters more than volume. Because such filtering requires a mechanistic predictor, we tested a mechanism-free alternative combining phylogenetic agreement and experimental labels, which recovered part of the gain but not the recall advantage. Concordance-trained models were bounded specialists, rescuing mechanistic false negatives twice as often as false positives (44\% versus 19\%), mostly metabolic generalists. To locate those bounds, model confidence defined an applicability domain, and prioritising low-confidence genomes for training improved cross-dataset accuracy more than random or diversity-based sampling, especially for the weaker phenotypes. This recasts generalisation in biological machine learning as a problem of label-mechanism agreement and applicability-domain definition, alongside data volume and algorithm choice.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2026

Integrative Modeling and Analysis of Fungal Central Carbon Metabolism

Over a thousand fungal genomes have been sequenced, yet manually curated genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are available for only a limited number of species. Moreover, these models have often been developed independently, leading to inconsistencies in namespaces, compartment definitions, and pathway representations that hinder comparative analysis, the systematic reuse of prior curation efforts, and the integration of consolidated metabolic knowledge. Here, we present the Consolidated Fungal Core Metabolism Model (CFCMM), constructed by integrating thirteen published fungal models spanning Ascomycota, Mucoromycota, and both Crabtree-positive and Crabtree-negative yeasts. We harmonized metabolites and reactions into a non-redundant shared ModelSEED ontological space, standardized compartmentalization, and refined gene-protein-reaction (GPR) rules. Using pathway-level visualization and systematic gap detection, we further improved the integrated network through literature-guided curation to correct stoichiometry, stereospecificity, and pathway architecture. Orthologous protein family reconstruction and functional annotation workflows were used to validate and inform GPR associations, with particular emphasis on ambiguous enzyme superfamilies and membrane-associated components. Using the resulting CFCMM, we built high-quality central carbon core models for each fungus and performed flux balance analysis to quantify ATP-yield variation under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, explicitly evaluating scenarios driven by differences in electron transport chain (ETC) composition. Simulations reproduced the expected fermentative yield of approximately 2 mmol ATP per mmol glucose under anaerobic conditions and separated the thirteen fungi into two bioenergetic groups under aerobic respiration based on Complex I status, with predicted yields of approximately 30 versus 22 mmol ATP per mmol glucose. Forcing flux through the alternative oxidase bypass further reduced ATP yields to approximately 12 and 4 mmol ATP per mmol glucose in Complex I-containing and Complex I-lacking fungi, respectively. Collectively, this work provides a manually curated, ModelSEED-consistent, and extensible fungal core metabolic template, deployed in DOE KBase as a resource for automated reconstruction of central carbon core models from any sequenced fungal genome. In addition, the CFCMM provides modular components for developing GEMs with more accurate energy predictions and enables robust comparative analyses of fungal bioenergetics and core metabolic diversity.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2023

ModelSEED v2: High-throughput genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction with enhanced energy biosynthesis pathway prediction

Since the release of ModelSEED in 2010, the systems biology research community has used the ModelSEED genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction pipeline to build over 200,000 draft metabolic reconstructions that support hundreds of publications. Here we describe the first comprehensive update to this reconstruction tool, with new features such as (i) a dramatically improved representation of energy metabolism, which ensures that models produce accurate amounts of ATP per mol of nutrient consumed; (ii) a new template for Archaea model reconstruction; and (iii) a significantly improved curation of all metabolic pathways with mappings to RAST subsystems annotations. We applied the improved pipeline to build and analyze core and genome-scale models for Archaea and Bacteria genomes in KEGG. The new ModelSEED pipeline generates larger models that possess more reactions and genes and require fewer gap-filled reactions. In addition, we see conserved patterns in the ATP biosynthesis mechanism across phylogeny, and identify clades where our understanding of energy biosynthesis is still poor. ModelSEED v2 is available through KBase and the ModelSEED website (https://modelseed.org/), which supports reconstruction, gap-filling, flux balance analysis and model export through a modern web interface.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Dissecting Complexity: The Hidden Impact of Application Parameters on Bioinformatics Research

Biology is a quest; an ongoing inquiry about the nature of life. How do the different forms of life interact? What makes up an ecosystem? How does a tiny bacterium work? To answer these questions biologists turn increasingly to sophisticated computational tools. Many of these tools are highly configurable, allowing customization in support of a wide range of uses. For example, algorithms can be tuned for precision, efficiency, type of inquiry, or for specific categories of organisms or their component subsystems. Ideally, configurability provides useful flexibility. However, the complex landscape of configurability may be fraught with pitfalls. This paper examines that landscape in bioinformatics tools. We propose a methodology, SOMATA, to facilitate systematic exploration of the vast choice of application parameters, and apply it to three different tools on a range of scientific inquires. We further argue that the tools themselves are complex ecosystems. If biologists explore these, ask questions, and experiment just as they do with their biological counterparts, they will benefit by both finding improved solutions to their problems as well as increasing repeatability and transparency. We end with a call to the community for an increase in shared responsibility and communication between tool developers and the biologists that use them in the context of complex system decomposition.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

The ModelSEED Database for the integration of metabolic annotations and the reconstruction, comparison, and analysis of metabolic models for plants, fungi, and microbes

For over ten years, ModelSEED has been a primary resource for the construction of draft genome-scale metabolic models based on annotated microbial or plant genomes. Now being released, the biochemistry database serves as the foundation of biochemical data underlying ModelSEED and KBase. The biochemistry database embodies several properties that, taken together, distinguish it from other published biochemistry resources by: (i) including compartmentalization, transport reactions, charged molecules and proton balancing on reactions;; (ii) being extensible by the user community, with all data stored in GitHub; and (iii) design as a biochemical "Rosetta Stone" to facilitate comparison and integration of annotations from many different tools and databases. The database was constructed by combining chemical data from many resources, applying standard transformations, identifying redundancies, and computing thermodynamic properties. The ModelSEED biochemistry is continually tested using flux balance analysis to ensure the biochemical network is modeling-ready and capable of simulating diverse phenotypes. Ontologies can be designed to aid in comparing and reconciling metabolic reconstructions that differ in how they represent various metabolic pathways. ModelSEED now includes 33,978 compounds and 36,645 reactions, available as a set of extensible files on GitHub, and available to search at https://modelseed.org and KBase.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2016

The DOE Systems Biology Knowledgebase (KBase)

The U.S. Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase (KBase) is an open-source software and data platform designed to meet the grand challenge of systems biology -- predicting and designing biological function from the biomolecular (small scale) to the ecological (large scale). KBase is available for anyone to use, and enables researchers to collaboratively generate, test, compare, and share hypotheses about biological functions; perform large-scale analyses on scalable computing infrastructure; and combine experimental evidence and conclusions that lead to accurate models of plant and microbial physiology and community dynamics. The KBase platform has (1) extensible analytical capabilities that currently include genome assembly, annotation, ontology assignment, comparative genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolic modeling; (2) a web-browser-based user interface that supports building, sharing, and publishing reproducible and well-annotated analyses with integrated data; (3) access to extensive computational resources; and (4) a software development kit allowing the community to add functionality to the system.

bioinformatics↗