bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cordonnier, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Cordonnier, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Maps of historical forests in France and their temporal continuity since the first half of the 19th century

AbstractIntegrating environmental history is essential for understanding present-day ecosystem dynamics and guiding modern conservation strategies, particularly under the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. This data paper presents the nationwide digitisation and vectorisation of the French General Ordnance survey map (1818-1866), capturing the countrys forest cover at its historical minimum (a pivotal moment known as the "forest transition"). The original manuscript sheets surveyed at a 1:40,000 scale (976 sheets) were scanned, georeferenced and vectorised. They offer higher thematic accuracy than the older Cassini map and are far more feasible for nationwide vectorisation than the highly detailed Napoleonic cadastre. The area-weighted mean survey date is 1843, and the dataset covers 99.6% of modern mainland France. To correct for paper deformation, historical surveying errors and coordinate system transformations, a rigorous workflow was established. This shifted from a global 6-parameter affine transformation (root mean square error of 60 m) to a local elastic transformation based on thousands of control points, for 21% of the territory, which reduced the positioning error to 34 m. We assessed data quality by comparing the General Ordnance Survey maps with the Napoleonic cadastre--the standard reference for 19th-century land-use data--across more than 600 municipalities. The correlation between the two sources regarding forest cover percentages was exceptionally high (r>0.9). Because forests formed large, compact blocks of significant strategic interest to military engineers, they were mapped with high precision. Localised inaccuracies were primarily found in remote areas, most notably in the mountains. The resulting historical vector layer was intersected with contemporary forest data (BD Foret(R) v2, 2005-2019). Historical polygons smaller than 0.5 ha were filtered out to comply with modern FAO forest definitions. This spatial overlay generated a new dataset detailing four distinct land-use trajectories: . ancient forests (44.8% of present day forest): land classified as forest in both the 19th century and the present day (indicating maximum temporal continuity). . recent forests (55.2% of present day forest): land that was non-forested in the 19th century but has since undergone reforestation. . deforested areas (18.9% of 19th-century forest): land recorded as forest in the 19th century but subsequently converted to other land uses. . stable non-forest areas: land that has remained unforested across both periods. Our results suggest that the forest area of mainland France at its historical minimum should be revised upward to 9.9 million ha. A preliminary analysis further indicates that current spatial variation in forest cover is explained more by land-use dynamics occurring since the forest transition than by the initial extent of forest cover. These two open-access national datasets (the 19th-century forest layer and the land-use transition map) open the door to a better understanding of present-day forests : e.g. their biodiversity, soil quality, tree growth and belowground water quality. Furthermore, they provide decision-support tools for conservation planning. Key messageIn this data paper, we provide a map of 19th-century forests in France based on the digitisation of the military topographic map (1818-1866). By overlaying this historical source with the present-day forest map, we built a second map which allows the identification of ancient forests, recent forests, and deforestation. These maps offer avenues for historical ecology and the design of conservation strategies.

ecology↗

Robust height-diameter allometries for 42 European tree species: stand characteristics and structure matter

Tree height is a key variable for assessing forest functioning and resources (e.g volume, carbon stocks) at both tree and stand levels. However, direct field measurements are costly and time-consuming. Developing accurate and unbiased height-diameter allometries applicable over large spatial scales is therefore crucial for forest research and management. Based on the French National Forest Inventory, with 269,460 tree-height observations on 49,120 plots measured, we developed generalized, species-specific height-diameter allometries that integrate stand dendrometrical characteristics and stand structure. The models cover 41 European tree species and the four main stand structures: even-aged, uneven-aged, coppice-with-standards and coppice. To enhance local accuracy, we developed an optional recalibration method at the plot level, assessing how many additional trees should be measured and which ones to select to maximize the improvement of the model. By integrating basal area as stand density and quadratic mean diameter as an indicator of stand development stage, our models enable us to assess the influence stand dendrometrical characteristics on these allometries and evaluate how different species responded to competition. Results indicate that with increasing competition, tree height tends to be higher for a given diameter, and that stand structure significantly influences 28 out of the 41 species. Local recalibration showed that measuring just one to six trees (among the largest and thinnest diameter) per plot reduced prediction error by 10 to 70%, depending on species. This study provides a useful, robust and scalable tool for forest research and management, for the most widespread species in Europe, while offering precision for local applications.

ecology↗

Managing mixed stands can mitigate severe climate change impacts on ecosystem functioning

Climate change affects forest ecosystem processes and related services due to increasing temperature and increasing extreme drought event frequency. This effect can be direct through the alteration of the physiological responses of trees, but also indirect, by modifying interactions between trees and thus changing communities composition. Such changes might affect species richness with high impacts on ecosystem functioning, especially productivity. Regarding management issues, mixed stands are usually considered a good option to maintain forest cover and ecosystem services under climate change. However, the possibility to maintain these mixed stands with management actions with positive effects on forest functioning under climate change remains uncertain and deserves further investigations. Relying on a simulation-based study with a forest gap model, we thus addressed the following questions: (1) Are monospecific stands vulnerable to climate change? (2) Would mixed stands significantly mitigate climate change effects on forest productivity and wood production under climate change? (3) Would conversion to mixed stand management affect significantly forest productivity and wood production under climate change compare to monospecific management? With a 150 years simulation approach, we quantified potential climate change effect (using RCP 8.5) compared to present climate and managements effect in the French Alps, focusing on five tree species. The gap-model we used included a management module, which allowed testing six silvicultural scenarios on different stands, with various composition, structure or environmental conditions, under climate change. These simulations showed that monospecific stands currently growing in stressful conditions would be too vulnerable to climate change to be maintained. Managing mixed stands or conversion from pure to mixed stands would make it possible to maintain higher productivity in the long-term than monospecific stands, even under severe climate change. This pattern depends to species and sites considered. Our results will feed into discussion on forest management in the context of climate change.

ecology↗