Convergent biology, divergent drivers: a cross-species comparison of human and canine invasive urothelial carcinoma
Traditional animal models are often inbred and genetically uniform. This makes them powerful for controlled experiments, but it limits how well they represent the patient-to-patient variation seen in real-world disease. Comparative oncology seeks to address this gap by studying naturally occurring cancers in outbred companion animals, especially dogs. Canine medicine offers two important advantages: first, prospective trials can often be completed faster than in humans and second, dogs are already part of the translational pipeline through pharmacokinetic and toxicology studies. Here, we assessed the transcriptional fidelity of human and canine invasive urothelial carcinoma in primary tumors and patient-derived organoids. We then used single-cell and spatial data to resolve the underlying cellular organization. Despite strong species and platform differences, human and canine tumors preserved the same major luminal-basal structure and a similar tumor microenvironment. The two species reached this shared biology through different recurrent mutations. These included FGFR3 alterations in humans and BRAF alterations in dogs, which converged on overlapping pathways and a luminal phenotype. Human and canine organoids also underwent a similar shift in culture. Both became more proliferative and metabolic while losing inflammatory programs. Thus, organoids preserved important tumor biology while introducing predictable platform effects. Single-cell and spatial analyses showed that the luminal-basal axis reflects a gradient of cell states organized around the tumor-stroma boundary, rather than two discrete tumor types. This helps explain why bulk RNA-sequencing subtypes are reproducible but coarse. Together, these findings define where canine and human bladder cancer agree, where they differ, and how dogs can support parallel therapeutic and diagnostic development.