bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Conwell, S. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Conwell, S. C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Strand-independent degradation of uncoupled forks by EXO1 activates ATR and restrains synthesis

Nascent DNA degradation of replication forks shapes genome stability, yet the mechanism of degradation, and its direct consequences, remain unclear. Here we use localized nascent strand degradation at replication forks in Xenopus egg extracts to examine the mechanism and consequences of degradation. The exonuclease EXO1 is crucial for degradation and acts specifically on replication fork structures. Degradation requires EXO1 catalytic activity and is defective in the E109K Lynch Syndrome associated mutant. EXO1 degrades both nascent strands 5-3: the lagging strand from its native 5 end and the leading strand from a distal 5 entry on the sister fork, whereas leading strand 3 end remains stable. Impaired leading-strand degradation at a specific site does not affect degradation of the corresponding lagging-strand region, so the two strands are degraded independently. Degradation of the uncoupled fork has two downstream consequences. It is important to activate ATR, which is otherwise weakly activated by the uncoupled fork. Additionally, degradation restrains fork progression, independent of ATR activation. Our findings demonstrate that strand-independent degradation of uncoupled forks by EXO1 activates ATR and restrains fork progression

biochemistry↗

Resolution of collapsed forks is separate from completion of DNA synthesis

Replication fork collapse at single-strand DNA breaks (SSBs) poses a serious threat to genome stability. Using Xenopus egg extracts, we show that a replication fork encountering an SSB on either the leading- or lagging-strand template produces a single-ended double-strand break (seDSB). These broken ends are efficiently resolved by homologous recombination to yield D-loops and erroneous end-to-end fusions. Surprisingly, DNA synthesis downstream of an seDSB is highly inefficient. In contrast, when two forks converge at an SSB, they generate a double-ended DSB (deDSB) that efficiently completes DNA synthesis through double-strand break repair that is not dependent on homologous recombination. Leading, but not lagging, seDSBs can undergo extensive nucleolytic degradation that disassembles the divergent fork. These secondary collapse events efficiently resolve seDSBs but without completion of DNA synthesis. Moreover, PARP inhibition can enhance fork collapse at unmodified SSBs but not at abasic site SSBs, contrary to expectations. Our findings distinguish end resolution from replication completion and demonstrate flexibility in how PARP inhibition affects fork collapse.

biochemistry↗