bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Conroy, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Conroy, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Genomic signatures of bottleneck and founder effects in dingoes

Dingoes arrived in Australia during the mid-Holocene and are the native top-order terrestrial predator on the mainland and some offshore islands. Although dingoes subsequently spread across the continent, the initial founding population(s) could have been small. To investigate this hypothesis, we examined the potential signatures of bottlenecks and founder effects in dingoes by sequencing the whole genomes of three dingoes and also obtaining the genome data from nine additional dingoes and 56 canines, including wolves, village dogs and breed dogs, and examined the signatures of bottlenecks and founder effects. We found that the nucleotide diversity of dingoes was low, and 36% less than highly inbred breed dogs and 3.3 times lower than wolves. The number of runs of homozygosity (RoH) segments in dingoes was 1.6 to 4.7 times higher than in other canines. Whilst examining deleterious mutational load, we observed that dingoes carried elevated ratios of nonsynonymous-to-synonymous diversities, significantly higher numbers of homozygous deleterious Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs), and increased numbers of loss of function SNVs, compared to breed dogs, village dogs, and wolves. These results suggest dingoes experienced a severe bottleneck, potentially caused by the limited number of founding individuals. While many studies observe less diversity and a higher number of deleterious mutations in domesticated populations compared to their wild relatives, we observed the opposite - .i.e. wild dingoes have lower diversity and a greater number of harmful mutations than domesticated dogs. Our findings can be explained by bottlenecks and founder effects during the establishment of dingoes on mainland Australia. These findings highlight the need for conservation-based management of dingoes and need for wildlife managers to be cognisant of these findings when considering the use of lethal control measures across the landscape.

evolutionary biology↗

The impact of human activities on Australian wildlife

Increasing human population size and the concomitant expansion of urbanisation significantly impact natural ecosystems and native fauna globally. Successful conservation management relies on precise information on the factors associated with wildlife population decline, which are challenging to acquire from natural populations. Wildlife Rehabilitation Centres (WRC) provide a rich source of this information. However, few researchers have conducted large-scale longitudinal studies, with most focussing on narrow taxonomic ranges, suggesting that WRC-associated data remains an underutilised resource, and may provide a fuller understanding of the anthropogenic threats facing native fauna.\n\nWe analysed admissions and outcomes data from a WRC in Queensland, Australia Zoo Wildlife Hospital, to determine the major factors driving admissions and morbidity of native animals in a region experiencing rapid and prolonged urban expansion.\n\nWe studied 31,626 admissions of 83 different species of native birds, reptiles, amphibians, marsupials and eutherian mammals from 2006 to 2017. While marsupial admissions were highest (41.3%), admissions increased over time for all species and exhibited seasonal variation (highest in Spring to Summer), consistent with known breeding seasons.\n\nCauses for admission typically associated with human influenced activities were dominant and exhibited the highest mortality rates. Car strikes were the most common reason for admission (34.7%), with dog attacks (9.2%), entanglements (7.2%), and cat attacks (5.3% also high. Admissions of orphaned young and overt signs of disease were significant at 24.6% and 9.7%, respectively. Mortality rates were highest following dog attacks (72.7%) and car strikes (69.1%) and lowest in orphaned animals (22.1%).\n\nOur results show that WRC databases offer rich opportunities for wildlife monitoring and provide quantification of the negative impacts of human activities on ecosystem stability and wildlife health. The imminent need for urgent, proactive conservation management to ameliorate the negative impacts of human activities on wildlife is clearly evident from our results.

ecology↗