bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Coca, S. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Coca, S. G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Prediction of rapid kidney function decline using machine learning combining blood biomarkers and electronic health record data

IntroductionIndividuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) or the APOL1 high-risk genotype (APOL1) are at increased risk of rapid kidney function decline (RKFD) as compared to the general population. Plasma biomarkers representing inflammatory and kidney injury pathways have been validated as predictive of kidney disease progression in several studies. In addition, routine clinical data in the electronic health record (EHR) may also be utilized for predictive purposes. The application of machine learning to integrate biomarkers with clinical data may lead to improved identification of RKFD.\n\nMethodsWe selected two subpopulations of high-risk individuals: T2DM (n=871) and APOL1 high risk genotype of African Ancestry (n=498), with a baseline eGFR [≥] 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 from the Mount Sinai BioMe Biobank. Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor 1/2 (TNFR1/2), and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) were measured and a series of supervised machine learning approaches including random forest (RF) were employed to combine the biomarker data with longitudinal clinical variables. The primary objective was to accurately predict RKFD (eGFR decline of [≥] 5 ml/min/1.73 m2/year) based on an algorithm-produced score and probability cutoffs, with results compared to standard of care.\n\nResultsIn 871 participants with T2DM, the mean age was 61 years, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 74 ml/min/1.73 m2, and median UACR was 13 mg/g. The median follow-up was 4.7 years from the baseline specimen collection with additional retrospective data available for a median of 2.3 years prior to plasma collection. In the 498 African Ancestry patients with high-risk APOL1 genotype, the median age was 56 years, median baseline eGFR was 83 ml/min/1.73 m2,and median UACR was 11 mg/g. The median follow-up was 4.7 years and there was additional retrospective data available for 3.1 years prior to plasma collection. Overall, 19% with T2DM, and 9% of the APOL1 high-risk genotype experienced RKFD. After evaluation of three supervised algorithms: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and Cox survival, the RF model was selected. In the training and test sets respectively, the RF model had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.81-0.83) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78-0.82) in T2DM, and an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.84-0.87) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86) for the APOL1 high-risk group. The combined RF model outperformed standard clinical variables in both patient populations. Discrimination was comparable in two sensitivity analyses: 1) Using only data from [≤] 1 year prior to baseline biomarker measurement and 2) In individuals with eGFR [≤]60 and/or albuminuria at baseline. The distribution of RFKD probability varied in the two populations. In patients with T2DM, the RKFD score stratified 18%, 49%, and 33% of patients to high-, intermediate-, and low-probability strata, respectively, with a PPV of 53% in the high-probability group and an NPV of 97% in the low-probability group. By comparison, in the APOL1 high-risk genotype, the RKFD score stratified 7%, 23%, and 70% of patients to high-, intermediate-, and low-probability strata, respectively, with a 46% PPV in the high-probability and an NPV of 98% NPV in the low-probability group.\n\nConclusionsIn patients with T2DM or of African Ancestry with the high-risk APOL1 genotype, a RF model derived from plasma biomarkers and longitudinal EHR data significantly improved prediction of rapid kidney function decline over standard clinical models. With further validation, this approach may be valuable in aiding clinicians in identifying patients who would benefit most from early and more aggressive follow-up to mitigate kidney disease progression.

epidemiology

Augmented Intelligence with Natural Language Processing Applied to Electronic Health Records is Useful for Identifying Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease at Risk for Disease Progression

ObjectiveElectronic health record (EHR) systems contain structured data and unstructured documentation. Clinical insights can be derived from analyzing both but optimal methods for this have not been studied extensively. We compared various approaches to analyzing EHR data for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).\n\nMaterials and MethodsWe compared analysis of structured and unstructured EHR data using natural language processing (NLP), free-text search, and diagnostic codes against expert adjudication as the reference standard.\n\nResultsOut of 38,575 patients, we identified 2,281 patients with NAFLD. From the remainder, 10,653 patients with similar data density were selected as a control group. NLP was more sensitive than ICD and text search (NLP 0.93 vs. ICD 0.28 vs. text search 0.81) with higher a F2 score (NLP 0.92 vs. ICD 0.34 vs. text search 0.81). 619 patients had suspected NAFLD documented in radiology notes not acknowledged in other forms of clinical documentation. Of these, 232 (37.5%) were found to have more advanced liver disease after a median of 1,057 days.\n\nDiscussionNLP-based approaches have superior accuracy in identifying NAFLD within the EHR compared to ICD/text search-based approaches. Suspected NAFLD on imaging is often not acknowledged in subsequent clinical documentation. Many such patients are later found to have more advanced liver disease.\n\nConclusionFor identification of NAFLD, NLP performed better than alternative selection modalities and facilitated follow-on analysis of information flow. If accuracy can be proven to persist across clinical domains, NLP can identify patient phenotypes for biomedical research in an accurate and high-throughput manner.

bioinformatics