bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Coad, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Coad, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Bayesian species distribution models integrate presence-only and presence-absence data to predict deer distribution and relative abundance.

The use of georeferenced information on the presence of a species to predict its distribution across a geographic area is one of the most common tools in management and conservation. The collection of high-quality presence-absence data through structured surveys is, however, expensive, and managers usually have more abundant low-quality presence-only data collected by citizen scientists, opportunistic observations, and culling returns for game species. Integrated Species Distribution Models (ISDMs) have been developed to make the most of the data available by combining the higher-quality, but usually less abundant and more spatially restricted presence-absence data, with the lower quality, unstructured, but usually more extensive and abundant presence-only data. Joint-likelihood ISDMs can be run in a Bayesian context using INLA (Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation) methods that allow the addition of a spatially structured random effect to account for data spatial autocorrelation. These models, however, have only been applied to simulated data so far. Here, for the first time, we apply this approach to empirical data, using presence-absence and presence-only data for the three main deer species in Ireland: red, fallow and sika deer. We collated all deer data available for the past 15 years and fitted models predicting distribution and relative abundance at a 25 km2 resolution across the island. Models predictions were associated to spatial estimate of uncertainty, allowing us to assess the quality of the model and the effect that data scarcity has on the certainty of predictions. Furthermore, we validated the three species-specific models using independent deer hunting returns. Our work clearly demonstrates the applicability of spatially-explicit ISDMs to empirical data in a Bayesian context, providing a blueprint for managers to exploit unused and seemingly unusable data that can, when modelled with the proper tools, serve to inform management and conservation policies.

ecology↗

Apolipoprotein ε4 modifies obesity-related atrophy in the hippocampal formation of cognitively healthy adults.

Characterizing age- and risk-related hippocampal vulnerabilities may inform about the neural underpinnings of cognitive decline. We studied the impact of three risk-factors, Apolipoprotein (APOE)-{varepsilon}4, a family history of dementia, and central obesity, on CA1, CA2/3, dentate gyrus (DG) and subiculum in 158 cognitively healthy adults (38-71 years). Subfields were labelled with the Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) and FreeSurfer (version 6) protocols. Volumetric and microstructural measurements from quantitative magnetization transfer and Neurite Orientation Density and Dispersion Imaging were extracted for each subfield and reduced to three principal components capturing apparent myelin/neurite packing, size/complexity, and metabolism. Aging was associated with an inverse U-shaped curve on myelin/neurite packing and affected all subfields. Obesity led to reductions in myelin/neurite packing and size/complexity regardless of APOE and FH status. However, amongst individuals with a healthy Waist-Hip-Ratio, APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers showed lower size/complexity than non-carriers. Protocol type did not affect this risk pattern. These findings provide novel evidence for interactive effects between APOE and central obesity on the hippocampal formation of cognitively healthy adults. HighlightsO_LIAge-related inverted U-shaped curve of hippocampal myelin/neurite packing C_LIO_LIObesity-related reductions of hippocampal myelin/neurite packing and size/complexity C_LIO_LIAPOE modifies the effects of obesity on hippocampal size/complexity C_LIO_LIAge-related slowing of spatial navigation C_LIO_LINo APOE, family history, or obesity effects on cognition C_LI

neuroscience↗