bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Clegg, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Clegg, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Recent hybridisation and ghost introgression among a trio of island passerines

Hybridisation between species was once considered a relatively uncommon occurrence but is now recognised to occur frequently across many different taxa. It can result in homogenisation of previously distinct forms, a potential conservation issue, but can also act as a catalyst for diversification through introgression and sharing of favourable genes. Repeated rounds of island colonisation followed by speciation result in secondary sympatry, with the potential for hybridisation between early and late arrivers. In the southwest Pacific, this situation has arisen in the avian family Zosteropidae (the white-eyes). Here we use whole genome sequencing of live birds and historical specimens to characterise hybridisation between three white-eye species on Norfolk Island: two island endemics, Zosterops tenuirostris and the now-extinct Zosterops albogularis, and Zosterops lateralis, which colonised the island in 1904. Despite over two million years of divergence between Z. lateralis and the two endemics, we provide genomic evidence of their hybridisation. First, we confirm the identities of three Z. lateralis x Z. tenuirostris hybrids and additionally identify one Z. lateralis x Z. albogularis hybrid. We also report asymmetric, genome-wide introgression from both endemics into Z. lateralis, with introgressed regions enriched for a range of potential functions. However, despite this introgression, species boundaries have been maintained, and the extant endemic Z. tenuirostris does not appear to be at risk of genetic extinction. Our work additionally demonstrates an unusual case of recent ghost introgression from the extinct Z. albogularis into Z. lateralis. This study sheds light on the genomic outcomes of secondary sympatry and its potential consequences for single-island endemics.

evolutionary biology↗

Ecology and not phylogeny influences sensitivity to climate change in Muscicapidae Flycatchers in Eastern Himalayan and Indo-Burman hotspots

AimsSpecies distributional responses to climate change can depend on ecology and phylogeny. The degree of habitat specialism is potentially important because habitat generalists with wider distributions are assumed to be less sensitive to environmental changes compared to narrowly-distributed habitat specialists. Additionally, predicting which aspects of the changing climate impacts species with different habitat associations may be particularly challenging in complex environments such as those of tropical mountains. We explore the effects of climate change on potential distributions of Muscicapidae Flycatchers in parts of the Eastern Himalayan Mountains and the Indo-Burman range, and relate predictions to the level of ecological habitat specialism, while accounting for phylogenetic relatedness. LocationBhutan and Northeast India MethodsWe used Maxent to develop ecological niche models of 60 Muscicapidae Flycatchers under different climatic scenarios by collating presences from Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Bioclimatic variables from WorldClim, and elevation from ASTER. Species were scored as habitat specialists or generalists using the Species Specialism Index. Variables with high contributions to Maxent models were extracted to explore sensitivity to climate change based on habitat specialism while testing for phylogenetic signal using Phylogenetic Generalised Least Squares. ResultsMaxent models had the highest contributions from variable bio8 (mean temperature of wettest quarter) under present climate, and tmax (maximum temperature) under future climatic scenarios. Phylogenetic Generalised Least Squares revealed that habitat generalists had higher sensitivity to climate change than specialists. We did not detect strong phylogenetic signal in sensitivity to abiotic variables under all climate scenarios. Main conclusionsPotential distributions of Muscicapidae Flycatchers were sensitive to temperature variable in the month of the highest precipitation, and to maximum temperature. Potential distributions of habitat generalists were particularly sensitive to these abiotic variables, and those of habitat specialists less so. Sensitivity to abiotic variables did not show a pattern of phylogenetic niche conservatism. climate change, Muscicapidae Flycatchers, phylogenetic niche conservatism, habitat specialism, tropical mountains, Maxent

ecology↗

Long-insert sequence capture detects high copy numbers in a defence-related beta-glucosidase gene Betaglu-1 with large variations in white spruce but not Norway spruce

Conifers are long-lived and slow-evolving, thus requiring effective defences against their fast-evolving insect natural enemies. The copy number variation (CNV) of two key acetophenone biosynthesis genes Ugt5/Ugt5b and {beta}glu-1 may provide a plausible mechanism underlying the constitutively variable defence in white spruce (Picea glauca) against its primary defoliator, spruce budworm. This study develops a long-insert sequence capture probe set (Picea_hung_p1.0) for quantifying copy number of {beta}glu-1-like, Ugt5-like genes and single-copy genes on 38 Norway spruce (Picea abies) and 40 P. glauca individuals from eight and nine provenances across Europe and North America respectively. We developed local assemblies (Piabi_c1.0 and Pigla_c.1.0), full-length transcriptomes (PIAB_v1 and PIGL_v1), and gene models to characterise the diversity of {beta}glu-1 and Ugt5 genes. We observed very large copy numbers of {beta}glu-1, with up to 381 copies in a single P. glauca individual. We observed among-provenance CNV of {beta}glu-1 in P. glauca but not P. abies. Ugt5b was predominantly single-copy in both species. This study generates critical hypotheses for testing the emergence and mechanism of extreme CNV, the dosage effect on phenotype, and the varying copy number of genes with the same pathway. We demonstrate new approaches to overcome experimental challenges in genomic research in conifer defences.

evolutionary biology↗

The multiple population genetic and demographic routes to islands of genomic divergence

1. The way that organisms diverge into reproductively isolated species is a major question in biology. The recent accumulation of genomic data provides promising opportunities to understand the genomic landscape of divergence, which describes the distribution of differences across genomes. Genomic areas of unusually high differentiation have been called genomic islands of divergence. Their formation has been attributed to a variety of mechanisms, but a prominent hypothesis is that they result from divergent selection over a small portion of the genome, with surrounding areas homogenised by gene flow. Such islands have often been interpreted as being associated with divergence with gene flow. However other mechanisms related to genetic architecture and population history can also contribute to the formation of genomic islands of divergence.\n\n2. We currently lack a quantitative framework to examine the dynamics of genomic landscapes under the complex and nuanced conditions that are found in natural systems. Here, we develop an individual-based simulation to explore the dynamics of diverging genomes under various scenarios of gene flow, selection and genotype-phenotype maps.\n\n3. Our modelling results are consistent with empirical observations demonstrating the formation of genomic islands under genetic isolation. Importantly, we have quantified the range of conditions that produce genomic islands. We demonstrate that the initial level of genetic diversity, drift, time since divergence, linkage disequilibrium, strength of selection and gene flow are all important factors that can influence the formation of genomic islands. Because the accumulation of genomic differentiation over time tends to erode the signal of genomic islands, genomic islands are more likely to be observed in recently divergent taxa, although not all recently diverged taxa will necessarily exhibit islands of genomic divergence. Gene flow primarily slows the swamping of islands of divergence with time.\n\n4. By using this framework, further studies may explore the relative influence of particular suites of events that contribute to the emergence of genomic islands under sympatric, parapatric and allopatric conditions. This approach represents a novel tool to explore quantitative expectations of the speciation process, and should prove useful in elucidating past and projecting future genomic evolution of any taxa.

genomics↗