bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Claassen, D. O.

Publications and source records attributed to Claassen, D. O..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mesolimbic local field potentials are modulated by motor control

Background and ObjectivesWhile historically cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops were believed to process limbic and sensorimotor data in parallel, there is now evidence to suggest that the two information streams can be processed in a single open loop. However, the limbic-motor interface remains insufficiently characterized. We sought to further investigate how extrastriatal regions may regulate motor output by examining electrophysiological activity in these areas during a response inhibition paradigm. MethodsWe recorded local field potentials (LFPs) from epilepsy patients implanted with intracranial depth electrodes for seizure localization purposes. Participants performed the stop-signal task, during which they made speeded choice reactions to "go" stimuli and occasionally inhibited their reactions in the incident of a "stop" signal. To compare power during movement and the absence of movement, we applied a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Additionally, we performed a linear mixed-effects model to relate power in limbic regions to power in the motor cortex. Finally, we implemented exploratory analyses to identify power differences for correct go versus correct stop trials and for correct stop versus incorrect stop trials using cluster-based permutation testing. Results14 patients participated. A comparison between movement and baseline fixation revealed that motor response is associated with reduced beta (15-35 Hz) power in the amygdala, hippocampus, and motor cortex and reduced gamma (35-100 Hz) power in the amygdala and hippocampus. Moreover, average beta and gamma power in the amygdala and hippocampus during motor execution were positively associated with average beta and gamma power in the motor cortex. Additionally, we identified significant differences between correct go and stop trials in delta (1-4 Hz) power for all three regions and in theta (4-8 Hz) power for the amygdala and motor cortex. Likewise, we identified significant differences between correct and incorrect stop trials in delta power for the hippocampus and motor cortex, in theta power for the motor cortex, in alpha (8-15 Hz) and beta power for the amygdala and motor cortex, and in gamma power for all three areas. DiscussionThese correlations between neural oscillations in the hippocampus and amygdala and movement strengthen the notion of mesolimbic modulation of motor activity.

neuroscience↗

Corticostriatal Beta Power Changes Associated with Cognitive Function in Parkinsons Disease

Cognitive impairment (CI) is the most frequent nonmotor symptom in Parkinsons Disease (PD) and is associated with deficits in executive functions such as working memory. Previous studies have demonstrated that caudate beta power is involved in learning and working memory. Decreased dopamine in motor cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuits results in increased beta power and PD motor symptoms. Analogous changes in cognitive CSTC circuits, including the caudate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), may contribute to PD CI. The objective of our study is to evaluate whether beta power changes in caudate and DLPFC contribute to cognitive impairment in PD patients. To investigate this, we used local field potential (LFP) recordings during deep brain stimulation surgery in 15 PD patients. LFP signals from DLPFC and caudate were performed at rest and during a verbal working memory task. We examined beta power changes during the working memory task and relationship of beta power to pre-operative neuropsychological testing results. Beta power decreased in both DLPFC and caudate during encoding of correct trials, whereas beta power increased in DLPFC and caudate during feedback for correct responses. Subjects with cognitive impairment showed smaller decreases in caudate and DLPFC beta power during encoding, greater increases in beta power during feedback, and lower average resting-state beta power. Additionally, reduced caudate beta power during encoding correlated with better memory scores on pre-operative neuropsychological testing, while greater DLPFC beta power during feedback correlated with worse scores in the attention domain. Our findings suggest that similar to the relationship between beta power in motor CSTC circuits and PD motor symptoms, beta power changes in parallel cognitive CSTC circuits may be correlated with cognitive symptoms in PD patients.

neuroscience↗