bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Cipriani, G. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Cipriani, G. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Emotional Distractors Capture Attention even at Very Low Contrast Levels: ERP evidence

Emotional visual stimuli, whether appealing or aversive, preferentially capture exogenous attention due to their evolutionary significance. This study assessed whether such capacity persists at low contrast levels, where stimuli are minimally perceived. To this end, we recorded behavioral and electrophysiological (event-related potentials, ERPs) indices of attentional capture from 38 participants who were exposed to negative, neutral, and positive scenes, each presented at four distinct contrast levels. These contrast levels had previously resulted in a correct recognition rate of up to 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% in a previous sample of 235 participants. Participants were presented with these scenes as distractors while simultaneously performing a perceptual task involving line orientation discrimination. The ERP results confirmed the expected emotional effect on exogenous attention and, critically, unveiled its persistence across all contrast levels. Specifically, occipito-parietal P1 (88-119 ms) was larger for negative than for positive distractors, while in a spreaded N2 component, positive distractors elicited larger amplitudes relative to both negative (213-354 ms) and neutral (213-525 ms) images. These findings reinforce the advantage of emotional distractors in accessing neural processing automatically and highlight the existence of a temporal negativity bias. Importantly, our novel findings emphasize the robustness of this exogenous attention pattern, present even under limited perceptual conditions.

neuroscience↗

Fast unconscious processing of emotional stimuli in early stages of the visual cortex

Several cortical and subcortical brain areas have been reported to be sensitive to the emotional content of subliminal stimuli. However, the timing of these activations remains unclear. Our scope was to detect the earliest cortical traces of visual unconscious processing by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) from 43 participants. Subliminal spiders (emotional) and wheels (neutral), sharing similar low-level visual parameters, were presented at two different locations (fixation and periphery). The differential (peak to peak) amplitude from CP1 (77 milliseconds from stimulus onset) to C2 (100 milliseconds), two early visual ERP components originated in V1/V2 according to source localization analyses, was analyzed via Bayesian and traditional analyses. Spiders elicited greater CP1-C2 amplitudes than wheels when presented at fixation. This fast effect of subliminal stimulation -not reported previously to the best of our knowledge-has implications in several debates: i) the amygdala cannot be mediating these effects, ii) latency of other evaluative structures recently proposed, such as the visual thalamus, is compatible with these results, iii) the absence of peripheral stimuli effects points to a relevant role of the parvocellular visual system in unconscious processing.

neuroscience↗

Differential neural encoding of sound under visual attention is shaped by audiovisual precision and unimodal uncertainty priors

Selective attentional biases arising from one sensory modality may manifest in another. The effects of visuospatial attention, often considered a foundation for visual object perception, are unclear in the auditory domain during audiovisual (AV) scene processing. This study investigates temporal and spatial factors that facilitate such cross-modal bias transfer at the neural level. Auditory encoding of random tone pips in AV scenes was investigated via a temporal response function model (TRF) of the participants electroencephalogram (N=30). The spatially uninformative pips were associated with spatially distributed visual contrast reversals ( flips) through asynchronous, probabilistic AV temporal onset distributions. Participants deployed visuospatial selection on these AV stimuli to perform a task. A late (~300 ms) cross-modal transfer of the unimodal attentional bias was found on the neural representation of pips. Transfer depended on the selected visual input being (i) presented during or shortly after a related sound in a relatively limited temporal window (<165 ms); and (ii) positioned across limited (1:4) visual foreground to background ratios. In addition, the magnitude of attentional enhancement was proportional to the proximity of flips to the foreground area. The results indicate that ongoing neural representations of sounds can incorporate relevant visuospatial attributes for auditory stream segregation.

neuroscience↗