bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Chiu, V.

Publications and source records attributed to Chiu, V..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Selective IL13Rα2-Targeted Functionality of IL13-Ligand CARs is Enhanced by Inclusion of 4-1BB Co-Stimulation

ABSTRACTChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapy is emerging as a powerful strategy for cancer therapy; however, an important safety consideration is the potential for off-tumor recognition of normal tissue. This is particularly important as ligand-based CARs are optimized for clinical translation. Our group has developed and clinically translated an IL13(E12Y) ligand- based CAR targeting the cancer antigen IL13R2 for treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). There remains limited understanding of how IL13-ligand CAR design impacts the activity and selectivity for the intended tumor-associated target IL13R2 versus the more ubiquitous unintended target IL13R1. In this study, we functionally compared IL13(E12Y)-CARs incorporating different intracellular signaling domains, including first-generation CD3{zeta}- containing CARs (IL13{zeta}), second-generation 4-1BB- (CD137) or CD28-containing CARs (IL13- BB{zeta} or IL13-28{zeta}), and third-generation CARs containing both 4-1BB and CD28 (IL13-28BB{zeta}). In vitro co-culture assays at high tumor burden establish that 2nd generation IL13-BB{zeta} or IL13- 28{zeta} outperform first-generation IL13{zeta} and 3rd generation IL13-28BB{zeta} CAR designs, with IL13- BB{zeta} providing superior CAR proliferation and in vivo anti-tumor potency in human xenograft mouse models. IL13-28{zeta} displayed a lower threshold for antigen recognition, resulting in higher off-target IL13R1 reactivity both in vitro and in vivo. Syngeneic mouse models of GBM also demonstrate safety and anti-tumor potency of murine IL13-BB{zeta} CAR T cells delivered systemically after lymphodepletion. These findings support the use of IL13-BB{zeta} CARs for greater selective recognition of IL13R2 over IL13R1, higher proliferative potential, and superior anti-tumor responsiveness. This study exemplifies the potential of modulating factors outside the antigen targeting domain of a CAR to improve selective tumor recognition..

immunology↗

2D or Not 2D? An FMRI Study of How Dogs Visually Process Objects

ABSTRACTGiven humans’ habitual use of screens, they rarely consider potential differences when viewing two dimensional (2D) stimuli and real-world versions of dimensional stimuli. Dogs also have access to many forms of screens and touch pads, with owners even subscribing to dog-directed content. Humans understand that 2D stimuli are representations of real-world objects, but do dogs? In canine cognition studies, 2D stimuli are almost always used to study what is normally 3D, like faces, and may assume that both 2D and 3D stimuli are represented in the brain the same way. Here, we used awake fMRI of 15 dogs to examine the neural mechanisms underlying dogs’ perception of two- and three-dimensional objects after the dogs were trained on either a two- or three-dimensional version of the objects. Activation within reward processing regions and parietal cortex of the dog brain to 2D and 3D versions of objects was determined by their training experience, as dogs trained on one dimensionality showed greater activation to the dimension on which they were trained. These results show that dogs do not automatically generalize between two- and three-dimensional stimuli and caution against implicit assumptions when using pictures or videos with dogs.Competing Interest StatementG.B. & M.S. own equity in Dog Star Technologies and developed technology used in some of the research described in this paper. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.View Full Text

animal behavior and cognition↗