bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Chittleborough, C. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Chittleborough, C. R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Adverse childhood experiences: associations with educational attainment and adolescent health, and the role of family and socioeconomic factors. Analysis of a prospective cohort study.

BackgroundExperiencing multiple adverse childhood experiences (ACE) is a risk factor for many adverse outcomes. However, the role of family and socioeconomic factors in these associations is often overlooked.\n\nMethods and findingsUsing data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, we assess associations of ACE between birth and 16 years (sexual, physical or emotional abuse, emotional neglect, parental substance abuse, parental mental illness or suicide attempt, violence between parents, parental separation, bullying, and parental criminal conviction) with educational attainment at 16 years (n=9,959) and health at age 17 years (depression, obesity, harmful alcohol use, smoking and illicit drug use, n=4,917). We explore the extent to which associations are robust to adjustment for family and socioeconomic factors, whether associations differ according to socioeconomic factors, and estimate the proportion of adverse educational and health outcomes attributable to ACE, family or socioeconomic measures.\n\nThere were strong associations of ACE with lower educational attainment and higher risk of depression, drug use and smoking. Associations with educational attainment attenuated after adjustment but remained strong. Associations with depression, drug use and smoking were not altered by adjustment. Associations of ACE with harmful alcohol use and obesity were weak. We found no evidence that associations differed by socioeconomic factors. Between 5-15% of the cases of adverse educational and health outcomes occur amongst people experiencing 4+ ACE, and between 1-19% occur in people whose mothers have a low level of education.\n\nConclusionsThis study demonstrates strong associations between ACE and lower educational attainment and worse health that are independent of family and socioeconomic factors. Our findings imply that interventions that focus solely on ACE or solely on socioeconomic deprivation, whilst beneficial, would miss most cases of adverse educational and health outcomes. Intervention strategies should therefore target a wide range of relevant factors, including ACE, socioeconomic deprivation, parental substance use and mental health.

epidemiology↗

The controlled direct effect of temperament at 2-3 years on cognitive and academic outcomes at 6-7 years

There is widespread interest in temperament and its impact upon cognitive and academic outcomes. Parents adjust their parenting according to their childs temperament, however, previous studies have not accounted for parenting while estimating the association between temperament and academic outcomes. We examined the controlled direct effect of temperament (2-3 years) on cognitive and academic outcomes (6-7 years) when mediation by parenting practices (4-5 years) was held constant. Participants were from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (n=5107). Cognitive abilities were measured by the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (verbal) and the Matrix Reasoning test (non-verbal). Literacy and numeracy were reported by teachers using the Academic Rating Scale. Mothers reported childrens temperament using the Short Temperament Scale for Toddlers (subscales: reactivity, approach, and persistence). Parenting practices included items about engagement in activities with children. Marginal structural models with inverse probability of treatment weights were used to estimate the controlled direct effect of temperament, when setting parenting to the mean. All temperament subscales were associated with cognitive abilities, with persistence showing the largest controlled direct effect on verbal ({beta}=0.58; 95%CI 0.27, 0.89) and non-verbal ({beta}=0.19; 0.02, 0.34) abilities. Higher persistence was associated with better literacy ({beta}=0.08; 0.03, 0.13) and numeracy ({beta}=0.08; 0.03, 0.13), and higher reactivity with lower literacy ({beta}=-0.08; -0.11, -0.05) and numeracy ({beta}=-0.07; -0.10, -0.04). There was little evidence that temperamental approach influenced literacy or numeracy. Overall, there was a small controlled direct effect of temperament on cognitive and academic outcomes after accounting for parenting and confounders.

epidemiology↗