bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Chiotti, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Chiotti, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Genome-wide classification of tumor-derived reads from bulk long-read sequencing

DNA extracted from tissue samples typically derives from a complex mixture of cell types. Without single cell analysis, it has been generally impossible to determine the cell type of origin for most molecules. One clear example of this is in the complex milieu of a human neoplasm. Here, we develop ROCIT (https://github.com/tobybaker/rocit), a transformer-based model to classify the tumor or non-tumor origin of individual reads from bulk tumor samples sequenced with long-read whole genome sequencing. Using somatic mutations to derive training data, ROCIT uses read-level methylation patterns to accurately classify reads from any-where in the genome without requiring the adjacent normal tissue or the explicit identification of tumor differentially methylated regions. We apply ROCIT to a cohort of prostate and ovarian tumors and demonstrate high classification accuracy across the entire genome. We then demonstrate the potential of ROCIT predictions to improve somatic variant calling. ROCIT represents a major step forward in the analysis of bulk tumors with long-reads, enabling the accurate and sensitive identification of reads with specific cell types of origin genome-wide.

bioinformatics↗

Crowd-sourced benchmarking of single-sample tumour subclonal reconstruction

Tumours are dynamically evolving populations of cells. Subclonal reconstruction algorithms use bulk DNA sequencing data to quantify parameters of tumour evolution, allowing assessment of how cancers initiate, progress and respond to selective pressures. A plethora of subclonal reconstruction algorithms have been created, but their relative performance across the varying biological and technical features of real-world cancer genomic data is unclear. We therefore launched the ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling -- Tumour Heterogeneity and Evolution Challenge. This seven-year community effort used cloud-computing to benchmark 31 containerized subclonal reconstruction algorithms on 51 simulated tumours. Each algorithm was scored for accuracy on seven independent tasks, leading to 12,061 total runs. Algorithm choice influenced performance significantly more than tumour features, but purity-adjusted read-depth, copy number state and read mappability were associated with performance of most algorithms on most tasks. No single algorithm was a top performer for all seven tasks and existing ensemble strategies were surprisingly unable to outperform the best individual methods, highlighting a key research need. All containerized methods, evaluation code and datasets are available to support further assessment of the determinants of subclonal reconstruction accuracy and development of improved methods to understand tumour evolution.

bioinformatics↗