Biology subjects

Chen, Y. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Chen, Y. P..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Insights from U.S. beekeeper triage surveys following unusually high honey bee colony losses 2024-2025

In January of 2025, U.S. commercial beekeepers reported unusually high honey bee colony losses as they prepared colonies for almond pollination. Two industry groups launched nationwide surveys to document colony losses between June 2024 and March 2025 across all scales of beekeeping. This study analyzes these survey data to assess colony losses, estimate financial impacts, and identify correlations with beekeeper management practices and geographical locations. Unlike past surveys, commercial beekeepers experienced more severe losses than smaller-scale beekeepers during this period. Respondents, managing over half of U.S. colonies, most frequently cited Varroa mites as the cause for their losses. Varroa mites were followed by pesticides and pathogens in the case of commercial beekeepers and by queen failure and weather in the case of smaller-scale beekeepers. Although Varroa was the most frequently cited cause, losses did not significantly differ between users and non-users of amitraz, suggesting that rising amitraz resistance alone does not explain observed trends. Differences in protein and carbohydrate feeding frequencies also played a role in net losses. While colony loss rates and financial concern varied widely among respondents, commercial beekeepers understandably showed higher sensitivity to financial impacts, with concerns increasing linearly with loss severity. This study highlights the value of beekeeper surveys which, alongside direct analyses of bee samples and longitudinal studies, help identify effective management strategies and environmental risks. Such insights are crucial for addressing the leading causes of colony losses on a national scale, and ultimately aid in safeguarding honey bee health, pollination services, and agricultural production. HighlightsO_LIUnprecedented honey bee colony losses C_LIO_LIIndications of disease stress C_LIO_LIHigh economic pain for commercial beekeepers and growers C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

Viruses and vectors tied to honey bee colony losses

Commercial beekeepers in the US reported severe colony losses early in 2025, as colonies were being staged for their critical role in the almond pollination season in California. Average reported losses since the preceding spring exceeded 60%, with substantial variation among operations. Many colonies were still actively collapsing in January, 2025, when pooled and individual samples were collected then screened for levels of known honey bee pathogens and parasites. Deformed wing virus strains A and B, along with Acute bee paralysis virus, were found at unusually high levels, either in pooled colony samples or in individual bees exhibiting shaking behaviors and morbidity. Differences between these two analyses suggest that direct collections of morbid bees provide a superior diagnostic for causal viruses, a suggestion borne out by confirmation of symptoms and morbidity following isolation and new inoculations. Since these viruses are known to be vectored by parasitic Varroa mites, mites from collapsed colonies were in turn screened for resistance to amitraz, a critical miticide used widely by beekeepers. Miticide resistance was found in all collected Varroa, underscoring the urgent need for new control strategies for this parasite. While viruses are a likely end-stage cause of colony death, other stressors such as nutritional stress and agrochemicals may have also played significant roles.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Punch in the gut: Parasite tolerance of phytochemicals reflects host diet

Gut parasites of plant-eating insects are exposed to antimicrobial phytochemicals that can reduce infection. Trypanosomatid gut parasites infect insects of diverse nutritional ecologies as well as mammals and plants, raising the question of how host diet-associated phytochemicals shape parasite evolution and host specificity. To test the hypothesis that phytochemical tolerance of trypanosomatids reflects the chemical ecology of their hosts, we compared related parasites from honey bees and mosquitoes--hosts that differ in phytochemical consumption--and contrasted our results with previous studies on phylogenetically related, human-parasitic Leishmania. We identified one bacterial and ten plant-derived substances with known antileishmanial activity that also inhibited honey bee parasites associated with colony collapse. Bee parasites exhibited greater tolerance of chrysin--a flavonoid found in nectar, pollen, and plant resin-derived propolis. In contrast, mosquito parasites were more tolerant of cinnamic acid--a product of lignin decomposition present in woody debris-rich larval habitats. Parasites from both hosts tolerated many compounds that inhibit Leishmania, hinting at possible trade-offs between phytochemical tolerance and mammalian infection. Our results implicate the phytochemistry of host diets as a potential driver of insect-trypanosomatid associations, and identify compounds that could be incorporated into colony diets or floral landscapes to ameliorate infection in bees. ORIGINALITY AND SIGNIFICANCETrypanosomatid parasites of insects pose threats to beneficial insects, crop plants, and human health. Elucidation of the environmental factors that determine host-parasite specificity and transmission of trypanosomatids is essential to predict the spread and spillover potential of trypanosomatids in wild and agricultural ecosystems. Our comparisons between trypanosomatids of bees and mosquitoes implicate the phytochemical composition of host diets as a potential determinant of insect-trypanosomatid associations. To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study of phytochemical tolerance in insect trypanosomatids. As the first characterization of phytochemical tolerance among honey bee-associated trypanosomatids, our results also identify compounds that could ameliorate infection of managed bees with parasites of concern to wild pollinators and associated with colony collapse.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Can floral nectars reduce transmission of Leishmania?

Insect-vectored Leishmania are the second-most debilitating of human parasites worldwide. Elucidation of the environmental factors that affect parasite transmission by vectors is essential to develop sustainable methods of parasite control that do not have off-target effects on beneficial insects or environmental health. Many phytochemicals that inhibit growth of sand fly-vectored Leishmania--which have been exhaustively studied in the search for phytochemical-based drugs--are abundant in nectar, which provide sugar-based meals to infected sand flies. In a quantitative meta-analysis, we compare inhibitory phytochemical concentrations for Leishmania to concentrations present in floral nectar and pollen. We show that nectar concentrations of several flowering plant species exceed those that inhibit growth of Leishmania cell cultures, suggesting an unexplored, landscape ecology-based approach to reduce Leishmania transmission. Strategic planting of antiparasitic phytochemical-rich floral resources or phytochemically enriched baits could reduce Leishmania loads in vectors, providing an environmentally friendly complement to existing means of disease control.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Development of a honey bee RNA virus vector based on the genome of Deformed wing virus.

We developed a honey bee RNA-virus vector based on the genome of a picorna-like Deformed wing virus (DWV), the main viral pathogen of the honey bee (Apis mellifera). To test the potential of DWV to be utilized as a vector, the 717 nt sequence coding for the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP), flanked by the peptides targeted by viral protease, was inserted into an infectious cDNA clone of DWV in-frame between the leader protein and the virus structural protein VP2 genes. The in vitro RNA transcripts from egfp-tagged DWV cDNA clones were infectious when injected into honey bee pupae. Stable DWV particles containing genomic RNA of the recovered DWV with egfp inserts were produced, as evidenced by cesium chloride density gradient centrifugation. These particles were infectious to honey bee pupae when injected intra-abdominally. Fluorescent microscopy showed GFP expression in the infected cells and Western blot analysis demonstrated accumulation of free eGFP rather than its fusions with DWV LP and/or VP2 proteins. Analysis of the progeny egfp-tagged DWV showed gradual accumulation of genome deletions for egfp, providing estimates for the rate of loss of a non-essential gene an insect RNA virus genome during natural infection.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2019

Deformed wing virus type A, a major honey bee pathogen, is vectored by the mite Varroa destructor in a non-propagative manner.

Honey bees, the primary managed insect pollinator, suffer considerable losses due to Deformed wing virus (DWV), an RNA virus vectored by the mite Varroa destructor. Mite vectoring has resulted in the emergence of virulent DWV variants. The basis for such changes in DWV is poorly understood. Most importantly, it remains unclear whether replication of DWV occurs in the mite. In this study, we exposed Varroa mites to DWV type A via feeding on artificially infected honey bees. A significant, 357-fold increase in DWV load was observed in these mites after 2 days. However, after 8 additional days of passage on honey bee pupae with low viral loads, the DWV load dropped by 29-fold. This decrease significantly reduced the mites ability to transmit DWV to honey bees. Notably, negative-strand DWV RNA, which could indicate viral replication, was detected only in mites collected from pupae with high DWV levels but not in the passaged mites. We also found that Varroa mites contain honey bee mRNAs, consistent with the acquisition of honey bee cells which would additionally contain DWV replication complexes with negative-strand DWV RNA. We propose that transmission of DWV type A by Varroa mites occurs in a non-propagative manner.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2018

Influence of food and Nosema ceranae infection on the gut microbiota of Apis cerana workers

BackgroundGut microbiota plays an essential role in bees health. To elucidate the effect of food and Nosema ceranae infection on the gut microbiota of honeybee Apis cerana, we used 16S rRNA sequencing to survey the gut microbiota of honeybee workers fed with sugar water or beebread and inoculated with or without N. ceranae.\n\nResultsThe gut microbiota of A. cerana is dominated by Serratia, Snodgrassella, and Lactobacillus genera. The overall gut microbiota diversity was significantly differential by food type. The N. ceranae infection significantly affects the gut microbiota only at bees fed with sugar water. Higher abundance of Lactobacillus, Gluconacetobacter and Snodgrassella and lower abundance of Serratia were found in bees fed with beebread than with sugar water. N. ceranae infection led to higher abundance of Snodgrassella and lower abundance of Serratia in sugar-fed bees. Imputed bacterial KEGG pathways showed the significant metagenomics functional differences by feeding and N. ceranae infections. Furthermore, A. cerana workers fed with sugar water showed lower N. ceranae spore loads but higher mortality than those fed with beebread. The cumulative mortality was strongly positive correlated (rho=0.61) with the changes of overall microbiota dissimilarities by N. ceranae infection.\n\nConclusionsBoth food and N. ceranae infection significantly affect the gut microbiota in A. cerana workers. Beebread feeding not only provide better nutrition but also help establish a more stabled gut microbiota therefore protect bee in response to N. ceranae infection.\n\nAbstract ImportanceGut microbiota plays an essential role in bees health. Scientific evidence suggests the diet and infection can affect the gut microbiota and modulate the gut health, however the interplay between those two factors and bee gut microbiota is not well known. In this study, we used high-throughput sequencing method to monitor the changes of gut microbiota by both food intake and the Nosema ceranae infection. Our result showed that the gut microbiota composition and diversity of Asia Honeybee was significantly associated with both food intake and the N. ceranae infection. More interestingly, bees fed with beebread showed higher microbiota stability and less mortality than those fed with sugar water when infected by N. ceranae. Those data suggest the potential role of beebread, not only providing better nutrition but also helping establish a more stabled gut microbiota to protect bee against N. ceranae infection.

microbiology↗