bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Chatelain, Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Chatelain, Y..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Data Augmentation Through Monte Carlo Arithmetic Leads to More Generalizable Classification in Connectomics

Machine learning models are commonly applied to human brain imaging datasets in an effort to associate function or structure with behaviour, health, or other individual phenotypes. Such models often rely on low-dimensional maps generated by complex processing pipelines. However, the numerical instabilities inherent to pipelines limit the fidelity of these maps and introduce computational bias. Monte Carlo Arithmetic, a technique for introducing controlled amounts of numerical noise, was used to perturb a structural connectome estimation pipeline, ultimately producing a range of plausible networks for each sample. The variability in the perturbed networks was captured in an augmented dataset, which was then used for an age classification task. We found that resampling brain networks across a series of such numerically perturbed outcomes led to improved performance in all tested classifiers, preprocessing strategies, and dimensionality reduction techniques. Importantly, we find that this benefit does not hinge on a large number of perturbations, suggesting that even minimally perturbing a dataset adds meaningful variance which can be captured in the subsequently designed models. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=65 SRC="FIGDIR/small/423084v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (17K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bccd23org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13fcfe1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@68e987org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bbada9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG This paper demonstrates how Monte Carlo Arithmetic, a dataagnostic perturbation technique, can be used for dataset augmentation during the generation of structural connectomes and improve downstream phenotypic prediction. C_FIG

neuroscience

Numerical Instabilities in Analytical Pipelines Lead to Large and Meaningful Variability in Brain Networks

The analysis of brain-imaging data requires complex processing pipelines to support findings on brain function or pathologies. Recent work has shown that variability in analytical decisions, small amounts of noise, or computational environments can lead to substantial differences in the results, endangering the trust in conclusions1-7. We explored the instability of results by instrumenting a connectome estimation pipeline with Monte Carlo Arithmetic8,9 to introduce random noise throughout. We evaluated the reliability of the connectomes, their features10,11, and the impact on analysis12,13. The stability of results was found to range from perfectly stable to highly unstable. This paper highlights the potential of leveraging induced variance in estimates of brain connectivity to reduce the bias in networks alongside increasing the robustness of their applications in the classification of individual differences. We demonstrate that stability evaluations are necessary for understanding error inherent to brain imaging experiments, and how numerical analysis can be applied to typical analytical workflows both in brain imaging and other domains of computational science. Overall, while the extreme variability in results due to analytical instabilities could severely hamper our understanding of brain organization, it also leads to an increase in the reliability of datasets.

neuroscience