Biology subjects

Chatard, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Chatard, B..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Multi-task Intracranial EEG recordings reveal a Comprehensive Role of the Human Dorsal Anterior Insula in High-Level Cognition

The dorsal anterior insula (dAI) is widely recognized as a cornerstone of human cognition. However, its functional characterization remains the subject of considerable debate and competing theories. Embracing a "shift in viewpoint" approach--defining a brain regions function through the observation of the same neural population across diverse experimental contexts--this study used intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings from a large cohort of patients to investigate the sub-second neural response dynamics of the human dAI across a broad range of cognitive tasks, spanning visual category discrimination, phonological and semantic processing, attentive visual search, and verbal and visuospatial working memory. This within-subject, multi-task iEEG framework offered a robust basis for decoding the structure-function relationship of the dAI and for empirically testing key predictions of prevailing theoretical models concerning its role. Our findings confirmed the dAIs involvement in the Action-Mode Network and shed new light on the large-scale spatiotemporal organization of that network, while providing novel insights into the interplay between cognitive effort and efficiency.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

The Inferior Frontal Sulcus, not the Anterior Insula, acts as a late-stage attentional gate for the fast rejection of salient but irrelevant sensory inputs during cognitive tasks

The ability to prioritize behaviorally relevant stimuli is essential for efficient cognition, particularly in distracting environments. The anterior insula (AI), a key node of the salience network, has been proposed to support this selection process by detecting salient events. A similar function, however, has also been attributed to the inferior frontal sulcus (IFS), located at the intersection of the ventral and dorsal attention networks. Here, we directly compared the respective contributions of these regions to attentional gatekeeping--the identification and rejection of attention-grabbing yet task-irrelevant "false positives" to preserve cognitive resources. We recorded intracranial EEG from 63 patients performing an attentive reading task designed to dissociate salience from task relevance. High-Frequency Activity (HFA) responses between 50 Hz and 150 Hz revealed that the IFS was the only region--across an extensive sampling of the frontal and insular cortices--to exhibit consistent, subsecond response dynamics compatible with the filtering of false positives. In contrast, the AI did not participate in the analysis or rejection of distractors and showed only sparse, delayed responses to targets, suggesting a role in coordinating or energizing downstream cognitive or motor processes rather than in salience detection per se. These findings indicate that the IFS--rather than the AI--is the primary late-stage node for attentional gatekeeping during cognitive tasks performed under distracting conditions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Neural shape mediation analysis

Neural signal shapes convey significant information about their generating processes. In this study, we introduce a data-driven methodology to identify sensory and behaviourally-relevant traces within neural responses. We present a phenomenological model that characterises temporal variations in intracranial EEG using eight interpretable parameters: peak time, peak intensity, initial and final baselines, accumulation and depletion period, and their respective concavities. This model effectively captures subtle signal variations, especially in sensory decision-making tasks. By decomposing the signals in this manner, we then conduct a comprehensive brain mediation analysis on iEEG datas shape, pinpointing regions that mediate behavioural processes. Importantly, we can determine which signal dynamics specifically reflect underlying behavioural processes, enhancing the depth of analysis and critique of their role in behaviour. Preliminary applications on a cohort of epileptic patients reveal that our model explains over a third of the signal variance at the trial level across all brain regions. We identified four key regions--encompassing sensory, associative, frontal, and premotor areas--that mediate the impact of task difficulty on reaction time. Notably, in these regions, it was the depletion period, rather than signal amplitude, that correlated with behavioural speed. This study highlights the potential of our approach in providing detailed insights into the neural mechanisms linking stimuli to behaviour.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Increase of both bottom-up and top-down attentional processes in high dream recallers

Event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with the involuntary orientation of (bottom-up) attention towards an unexpected sound are of larger amplitude in high dream recallers (HR) than in low dream recallers (LR) during passive listening, suggesting different attentional functioning. We measured bottom-up and top-down attentional performance and their cerebral correlates in 18 HR (11 women, age = 22.7 {+/-} 4.1 years, dream recall frequency = 5.3 {+/-} 1.3 days with a dream recall per week) and 19 LR (10 women, age = 22.3, DRF = 0.2 {+/-}0.2) using EEG and the Competitive Attention Task. Between-group differences were found in ERPs but not in behavior. The results confirm that HR present larger ERPs to distracting sounds than LR during active listening, suggesting enhanced bottom-up processing of irrelevant sounds. HR also presented a larger contingent negative variation during target expectancy and a larger P3b response to target sounds than LR, speaking for an enhanced recruitment of top-down attention. Enhancement of both top-down and bottom-up processes in HR leads to an apparently preserved attentional balance since similar performance were observed in the two groups. Therefore, different neurophysiological profiles can result in similar cognitive performance, with some profiles possibly costlier in term of resource/energy consumption.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

THE DUAL-TASK COST IS DUE TO NEURAL INTERFERENCES DISRUPTING THE OPTIMAL SPATIO-TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF THE COMPETING TASKS

Dual-tasking is extremely prominent nowadays, despite ample evidence that it comes with a performance cost: the Dual-Task (DT) cost. Neuroimaging studies have established that tasks are more likely to interfere if they rely on common brain regions, but the precise neural origin of the DT cost has proven elusive so far, mostly because fMRI does not record neural activity directly and cannot reveal the key effect of timing, and how the spatio-temporal neural dynamics of the tasks coincide. Recently, DT electrophysiological studies in monkeys have recorded neural populations shared by the two tasks with millisecond precision to provide a much finer understanding of the origin of the DT cost. We used a similar approach in humans, with intracranial EEG, to assess the neural origin of the DT cost in a particularly challenging naturalistic paradigm which required accurate motor responses to frequent visual stimuli (task T1) and the retrieval of information from long-term memory (task T2), as when answering passengers questions while driving. We found that T2 elicited neuroelectric interferences in the gamma-band (>40 Hz), in key regions of the T1 network including the Multiple Demand Network. They reproduced the effect of disruptive electrocortical stimulations to create a situation of dynamical incompatibility, which might explain the DT cost. Yet, participants were able to flexibly adapt their strategy to minimize interference, and most surprisingly, reduce the reliance of T1 on key regions of the executive control network - the anterior insula and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex - with no performance decrement. HIGHLIGHTS- First direct evidence in humans of neural interferences between two tasks. - First explanation of the Dual-Task cost at the neural level in humans. - First Dual-Tasking study with intracranial EEG in naturalistic conditions.

neuroscience↗