bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Charnavets, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Charnavets, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Interlaboratory benchmarking of differential scanning fluorimetry reveals sources of variability in protein thermal stability parameters

Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) is widely used to assess protein thermal stability and to compare protein variants, ligands, or formulations with limited sample consumption. Yet, the reproducibility of DSF derived parameters across laboratories, instruments and analysis workflows remains poorly defined. Here, we report a two phase interlaboratory benchmark using a shared VHH sample across 26 laboratories, 28 instruments and seven DSF instrument models. In Phase 1, participants applied their routine acquisition and analysis workflows, whereas in Phase 2, acquisition conditions were harmonised. Datasets were analysed locally and then centrally reprocessed with MoltenProt. Participant reported apparent melting temperatures (Tm) showed good within instrument repeatability but moderate inter instrument dispersion. Harmonisation of acquisition conditions did not substantially reduce this dispersion. Conversely, centralised reprocessing narrowed the distribution among retained datasets, indicating contributions from analysis workflows and data acceptance criteria in addition to instrument dependent factors. Comparison with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) further showed that apparent Tm depended strongly on the fluorescence readout. For this VHH, single wavelength fluorescence at 350 nm showed the closest agreement with the DSC transition temperature, whereas the 350/330 nm ratio and barycentric mean generally yielded higher values. Furthermore, DSF derived apparent unfolding enthalpies were more variable than apparent Tm. Together, these findings show that DSF can be highly repeatable within a defined instrument and workflow, but that quantitative comparability across instruments depends on instrument specific effects, the choice of fluorescence readout and analysis strategy. Improved comparability will require transparent reporting of acquisition and analysis conditions, explicit data quality criteria, and well characterised reference materials to monitor instrument dependent offsets.

biophysics↗

Prebiotically Plausible Peptides can Self-assemble into β-rich Nanostructures

Peptides can self-assemble into diverse morphologies in a programmable manner and hence are privileged building blocks used widely in nanotechnology. Most reported peptide nanostructures consist of one (or a few) defined sequence(s), as self-similarity is presumed to be essential for promoting assembly. While oligomerisation is seen as an important feature of the earliest functional polymers during the origin of life, prebiotic peptides were likely short, statistical, and non-templated - traits that seem incommensurate with robust self-assembly. Here we show that random 25-mer peptides can efficiently and spontaneously form highly thermostable, soluble assemblies rich with beta-sheets. Notably, these nanostructures only emerge when random peptides are constructed with an early alphabet, consisting of the 10 canonical amino acids that were also prebiotically abundant - but not other alphabets tested. Hence, our findings show that peptide self-assembly does not require purity, and in fact compositional complexity is adaptive for preventing formation of insoluble structures. Altogether, this study showcases that unevolved sequences of prebiotically-abundant amino acids can readily produce foldable self-assembling polymers, thereby providing a potential steppingstone toward the first proteins, prior to the onset of purifying selection.

biochemistry↗

Early selection of the amino acid alphabet was adaptively shaped by biophysical constraints of foldability

Whereas modern proteins rely on a quasi-universal repertoire of 20 canonical amino acids (AAs), numerous lines of evidence suggest that ancient proteins relied on a limited alphabet of 10 early AAs, and that the 10 late AAs were products of biosynthetic pathways. However, many non-proteinogenic AAs were also prebiotically available, which begs two fundamental questions: Why do we have the current modern amino acid alphabet, and Would proteins be able to fold into globular structures as well if different amino acids comprised the genetic code? Here, we experimentally evaluated the solubility and secondary structure propensities of several prebiotically relevant amino acids in the context of synthetic combinatorial 25-mer peptide libraries. The most prebiotically abundant linear aliphatic and basic residues were incorporated along with or in place of other early amino acids to explore these alternative sequence spaces. We show that foldability was a critical factor in the selection of the canonical alphabet. Unbranched aliphatic and short-chain basic amino acids were purged from the proteinogenic alphabet despite their high prebiotic abundance because they generate polypeptides that are over-solubilized and have low packing efficiency. Surprisingly, we find that the inclusion of a short-chain basic amino acid also decreases polypeptides secondary structure potential. Our results support the view that despite lacking basic residues, the early canonical alphabet was remarkably adaptive at supporting protein folding and explain why basic residues were only incorporated at a later stage of the alphabet evolution.

biophysics↗