bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Channathodiyil, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Channathodiyil, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

DNA replication during acute MEK inhibition drives acquisition of resistance through amplification of the BRAF oncogene

Mutations and gene amplifications that confer drug resistance emerge frequently during chemotherapy, but their mechanism and timing is poorly understood. Here, we investigate BRAFV600E amplification events that underlie resistance to the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244/ARRY-142886) in COLO205 cells, a well-characterised model for reproducible emergence of drug resistance, and show that de novo amplification of BRAF is the primary path to resistance irrespective of pre-existing amplifications. Selumetinib causes long-term G1 arrest accompanied by reduced expression of DNA replication and repair genes, but cells stochastically re-enter the cell cycle during treatment despite continued repression of pERK1/2. Most DNA replication and repair genes are re-expressed as cells enter S and G2, however, mRNAs encoding a subset of factors important for error-free replication and chromosome segregation including TIPIN, PLK2 and PLK3 remain at low abundance. This suggests that DNA replication in drug is more error prone and provides an explanation for the DNA damage observed under long-term RAF-MEK-ERK1/2 pathway inhibition. To test the hypothesis that DNA replication in drug promotes de novo BRAF amplification, we exploited the combination of palbociclib and selumetinib. Combined treatment with selumetinib and a dose of palbociclib sufficient to reinforce G1 arrest in selumetinib-sensitive cells, but not to impair proliferation of resistant cells, delays the emergence of resistant colonies, meaning that escape from G1 arrest is critical in the formation of resistant clones. Our findings demonstrate that acquisition of MEK inhibitor resistance often occurs through de novo gene amplification and can be suppressed by impeding cell cycle entry in drug.

molecular biology↗

Glyoxal fixation facilitates transcriptome analysis after antigen staining and cell sorting by flow cytometry

A simple method for extraction of high quality RNA from cells that have been fixed, stained and sorted by flow cytometry would allow routine transcriptome analysis of highly purified cell populations and single cells. However, formaldehyde fixation impairs RNA extraction and inhibits RNA amplification. Here we show that good quality RNA can be readily extracted from stained and sorted mammalian cells if formaldehyde is replaced by glyoxal - a well-characterised fixative that is widely compatible with immunofluorescent staining methods. Although both formaldehyde and glyoxal efficiently form protein-protein crosslinks, glyoxal does not crosslink RNA to proteins nor form stable RNA adducts, ensuring that RNA remains accessible and amenable to enzymatic manipulation after glyoxal fixation. We find that RNA integrity is maintained through glyoxal fixation, permeabilisation with methanol or saponin, indirect immunofluorescent staining and flow sorting. RNA can then be extracted by standard methods and processed into RNA-seq libraries using commercial kits; mRNA abundances measured by poly(A)+ RNA-seq correlate well between freshly harvested cells and fixed, stained and sorted cells. We validate the applicability of this approach to flow cytometry by staining MCF-7 cells for the intracellular G2/M-specific antigen cyclin B1 (CCNB1), and show strong enrichment for G2/M-phase cells based on transcriptomic data. Switching to glyoxal fixation with RNA-compatible staining methods requires only minor adjustments of most existing staining and sorting protocols, and should facilitate routine transcriptomic analysis of sorted cells.

molecular biology↗