bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Chan, M. M. Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Chan, M. M. Y..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Differential effects of neurodegenerative disorders on verbal creative idea generation and its cognitive cornerstones

Clinical research has documented a heterogeneous effect of neurodegenerative disorders on creativity. Some disorders are associated with impaired creative performance, while others may preserve, or even enhance, it. However, the underlying cognitive mechanisms that give rise to the heterogeneous behavioural manifestations remain poorly understood. From a theory-driven approach, we conducted a neuropsychological investigation to examine how frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) differentially affected the cognitive mechanisms underlying creative thought (semantic cognition, episodic memory, executive control functions). In parallel, we assessed participants' verbal creative idea generation performance using the ideational fluency task (also known as the Alternate Uses Task). We analysed data from 24 individuals with FTLD [clinical consensus diagnosis corticobasal syndrome (CBS: n=20) or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP: n=4)], 24 individuals with clinical consensus diagnosis AD, and 24 healthy individuals. We reached four major conclusions. First, while both disease groups exhibited deficits in controlled semantic retrieval and executive control functions, only participants with AD exhibited degradation in semantic representations and episodic memory. Second, both disease groups generated fewer responses in both typical and creative conditions across objects that were context-free - i.e., associated with multiple contexts (e.g., brick) and context-bound -i.e., associated with a dominant context (e.g., table knife). Third, when given a context-free object prompt, the ability to generate novel responses appeared to be preserved in participants with FTLD, which contrasted with an impaired ability when prompted to give creative uses for the context-bound object. Fourth, participants with AD produced similar levels of response novelty for both context-free and context-bound objects. From a clinical-cognitive neuroscience perspective, this study demonstrates that distinct cognitive profiles resulting from different neurodegenerative conditions yield differential effects on creative thought. As the first study to show that the contextual information of semantic stimuli can mediate the novelty of verbal responses, we suggest that future research should carefully examine how this factor influences creative task performance.

neuroscience↗

The cognitive and neural bases of creative thought: a cross-domain meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation studies

Creative thought enables humans to flexibly generate, evaluate and select novel and adaptive ideas according to different contexts. Decades of creativity research indicates that it involves at least two aspects: retrieval of previously acquired knowledge and manipulation of that knowledge. However, the cognitive processes underpinning these two aspects of creative thought remain underspecified. The broader clinical-cognitive neuroscience literature suggests that retrieval and manipulation of knowledge is underpinned by general purpose cognitive mechanisms supporting semantic cognition, controlled episodic memory retrieval, and executive mechanisms. To identify commonalities from converging evidence that points towards a unifying theory for the neurocognitive bases of creative thought, we reviewed and meta-analysed 152 studies from creativity and the relevant parallel cognitive neuroscience literature using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The results revealed three things: 1) current tDCS studies are heavily biased towards the frontal cortex (459/591 effect sizes; 77.7%); 2) only anodal tDCS over the left lateral frontal cortex promotes creativity (p <.01); and 3) anodal tDCS stimulation over the same region also promotes improvement in many other cognitive processes. The latter includes more efficient processing of semantic knowledge (p <.05), more accurate episodic memory retrieval (p <.05), better and more efficient manipulation of buffered knowledge (all p <.001), and more efficient response selection amongst competing options (i.e., task-setting; p <.01). By merging these previously separate literatures, tDCS studies support the notion that creative thought arises from general purpose cognitive mechanisms including controlled retrieval and temporary storage of semantic and episodic information, as well as executive mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

The neural basis of creative thought: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis involving over 17,000 participants

Humans can create impressive art, make major scientific breakthroughs, and generate creative solutions that solve everyday life problems. But how are these creative activities supported by the brain? This question is of great scientific interest but remains unanswered. New hypotheses, grounded in converging evidence from cognitive neuroscience, are needed to guide breakthroughs in understanding the neural basis of creative thought. It has long been suggested that creativity is a distinct mental function. However, converging clinical-cognitive neuroscience evidence is starting to suggest that creative thought is not functionally distinct but, instead, might arise from general purpose cognitive mechanisms supporting semantic cognition, controlled episodic memory retrieval, and executive mechanisms (i.e., Cognitive Cornerstones Hypothesis; Chan et al., 2023). Results from this large-scale activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis, based on 787 experiments with 10,357 foci from 17,228 healthy adult participants, showed that the brain regions implicated in creativity tasks heavily overlap with the brain regions implicated in the cognitive cornerstones of creative thought (i.e., pre-existing knowledge and executive mechanisms). These striking results suggest that innovative insights will arise from considering the roles of these fundamental cognitive functions and their interactions in supporting creative thought.

neuroscience↗